December 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1179214] Ultimaker Cura 4.8.0 crashing on start
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179214 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179214#c6 Benjamin Greiner <code(a)bnavigator.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Greiner <code(a)bnavigator.de> --- The new python-qt5 build without --debug has made it into Tumbleweed 20201211 I am still getting crashes (after closing cura: https://paste.opensuse.org/52092655) but that is out of scope for this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177260] Switching python-numpy to plain BLAS causes significant performance regression
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260#c16 --- Comment #16 from Stefan Br�ns <stefan.bruens(a)rwth-aachen.de> --- > life would be easier if 'osc build' would allow to pick up from and rerun later stages of the build process without having to go thru the 'build' stage every time :( ccache definitely helps. You can also "osc chroot" and rerun make after monkeypatching. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177260] Switching python-numpy to plain BLAS causes significant performance regression
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260#c15 --- Comment #15 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- I wonder if the updates for lapack / openblas should go straight to science or if a staging project would make sense for testing - before things break for everybody. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177260] Switching python-numpy to plain BLAS causes significant performance regression
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177260#c14 --- Comment #14 from Egbert Eich <eich(a)suse.com> --- I've converted netlib-lapack and openblas so that their respective blas & lapack libraries are held and switched together. This was not without challenges - as can be seen from https://github.com/e4t/brp-check-suse/commit/9769cc60206f2ba54466f471705cbf… I don't particularly like update-alternatives, they are inflexible because system wide - your suggestion to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH for a user to override the system wide settings is exactly what environment modules are doing. Flexiblas seems to be a good abstraction, it should work well with the changes I've made, however, I won't be looking at it this time - I had my share of packaging for this time - life would be easier if 'osc build' would allow to pick up from and rerun later stages of the build process without having to go thru the 'build' stage every time :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1179158] fstrim.timer (fstrim -Av) crashes system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179158 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179158#c6 --- Comment #6 from Joerg Frede <frede(a)b1-systems.de> --- If you have any test kernel i can test it on my Server and give feedback. Kind Regards, Joerg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1179158] fstrim.timer (fstrim -Av) crashes system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179158 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179158#c5 --- Comment #5 from Coly Li <colyli(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Coly Li from comment #4) > (In reply to Hannes Reinecke from comment #3) > > Coly, can you have a look? > > Yes. This is an upstream bug, the maintainer is about to revert the > problematic patch from mainline. I will do similar thing for our kernel. The following patches should be reverted from our kernel, Revert "dm raid: remove unnecessary discard limits for raid10" Revert "md/raid10: improve discard request for far layout" Revert "md/raid10: improve raid10 discard request" Revert "md/raid10: pull codes that wait for blocked dev into one function" Revert "md/raid10: extend r10bio devs to raid disks" Revert "md: add md_submit_discard_bio() for submitting discard bio" Working on it now. Coly Li -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1179763] Patch openSUSE-2020-2161 - EDAC amd64: Error: F1 not found with AMD A10-5750M APU
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179763 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179763#c6 Donald Curtis <bugrprt21882(a)online.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(bugrprt21882@onli | |ne.de) | --- Comment #6 from Donald Curtis <bugrprt21882(a)online.de> --- (In reply to Borislav Petkov from comment #5) > Thanks, I think I know what the problem is. And the fix is trivial. Are you > able to test patches or should I give you a test kernel to try? If you include a Make file, I should be able to test the patch - even if the Kernel source isn't installed on the Laptop, it's not a big deal to install it. * What's with the EDAC source? I haven't checked if that's included with the Kernel source . . . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1179973] New: HSQLDB installation don't start properly
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179973 Bug ID: 1179973 Summary: HSQLDB installation don't start properly Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: luca.forzano(a)tiscali.it QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- HSQLDB installed by YAST, so standard repository fails to start, due to error in the service file: /usr/lib/systemd/system/hsqldb.service in 9,11c9,11 < ExecStart=/usr/libexec/hsqldb/hsqldb-wrapper < ExecStartPost=/usr/libexec/hsqldb/hsqldb-post < ExecStop=/usr/lib/hsqldbexec/hsqldb-stop --- > ExecStart=/usr/lib/hsqldb/hsqldb-wrapper > ExecStartPost=/usr/lib/hsqldb/hsqldb-post > ExecStop=/usr/lib/hsqldb/hsqldb-stop so the real path of the file listed is: /usr/libexec/hsqldb/ There is also the warning that the file permissions: /var/lib/hsqldb/sqltool.rc owned by hsqldb user must be changed in 600. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1179284] Version 20201027 from UCODE-INTEL completely blocks booting
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179284 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179284#c3 Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ygrosjean(a)belgacom.net Flags| |needinfo?(ygrosjean@belgaco | |m.net) --- Comment #3 from Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.com> --- can you add dmesg|grep microcode after a successful boot with the old ucode? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1169614] AUDIT-0: cockpit: setuid, dbus, pam
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169614 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169614#c20 --- Comment #20 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- openSUSE-SU-2020:2232-1: An update that contains security fixes can now be installed. Category: security (moderate) Bug References: 1169614 CVE References: JIRA References: Sources used: openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP2 (src): rpmlint-1.10-bp152.4.8.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0