November 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1155310] xfs_fsr ignores / misinterpretes its -p option
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155310 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155310#c12 Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiopoulos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gerben.jansen(a)aol.com Flags| |needinfo?(gerben.jansen@aol | |.com) --- Comment #12 from Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiopoulos(a)suse.com> --- Do you have any feedback on this fix? Did it work for you? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1168783] New: libinput-tools: missing dependency on python3-libevdev
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168783 Bug ID: 1168783 Summary: libinput-tools: missing dependency on python3-libevdev Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: X.Org Assignee: xorg-maintainer-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dev.rindeal+opensuse(a)gmail.com QA Contact: xorg-maintainer-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- ``` > /usr/lib/libinput/libinput-measure-touchpad-pressure Error: No module named 'libevdev' One or more python modules are missing. Please install those modules and re-run this tool. ``` Please do not confuse python3-libevdev with python3-evdev. `python3-libevdev` is what's missing here and it's not even packaged yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 921411] Java:packages/libtcnative-1-0: Bug
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921411 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921411#c6 Matei Albu <malbu(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #6 from Matei Albu <malbu(a)suse.com> --- Closing. Tested on Leap 15.1. Seems to work fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1162597] tomcat does not run with https
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162597 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162597#c1 Matei Albu <malbu(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from Matei Albu <malbu(a)suse.com> --- Closing. I could not reproduce it on Leap 15.1 with the latest Tomcat version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1178434] VUL-0: CVE-2020-1777,CVE-2020-11023,CVE-2020-11022: otrs: OTRS Security Advisory 2020-15
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178434 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178434#c2 --- Comment #2 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1178434) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/846050 Factory / otrs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1176692] gpg --recv-keys error
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176692 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176692#c4 --- Comment #4 from Wilhelm Schartner <schartnerw(a)outlook.com> --- Hello I looked it up in the wiki but the command gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys 0x22C07BA534178CD02EFE22AAB88B2FD43DBDC284 you wrote is not only there that I wrote and wherever the error message comes. is the command gpg --recv-keys 0x22C07BA534178CD02EFE22AAB88B2FD43DBDC284 no longer valid? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1176294] salt RPM scriptlet contains syntax error
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176294 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176294#c9 --- Comment #9 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2020:3155-1: An update that solves three vulnerabilities and has 6 fixes is now available. Category: security (critical) Bug References: 1159670,1175987,1176024,1176294,1176397,1177867,1178319,1178361,1178362 CVE References: CVE-2020-16846,CVE-2020-17490,CVE-2020-25592 JIRA References: Sources used: SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15-SP2 (src): salt-3000-4.20.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Python2 15-SP2 (src): salt-3000-4.20.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15-SP2 (src): salt-3000-4.20.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1176734] Wireless lan in AP-mode with WPA2: cannot establish any connection
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176734 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176734#c22 --- Comment #22 from Clemens Famulla-Conrad <cfamullaconrad(a)suse.com> --- > - config_a works nice, that means you can configure wpa_supplicant with WPA-PSK using RSN only! > - config_b shows the same effects (timeout loop) as with "nm" Ok, for some reason your wifi card isn't able run with WPA-PSK and TKIP only. This isn't that bad, because TKIP is not recommend anyway! Is there a configuration option to use `WPA2 Personal` without `WPA` in the security tab of the nm-applet? > Any idea what's gone wrong? The only thing which comes to my mind, do you have some concurrent wpa_supplicant running? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1178221] Latest image for openSUSE-Tumbleweed pine64 gets no IPv4 connection
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178221 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178221#c3 Freek de Kruijf <freek(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(freek(a)opensuse.or | |g) | --- Comment #3 from Freek de Kruijf <freek(a)opensuse.org> --- (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #2) > jeos-internal(a)suse.de is not for openSUSE ARM JeOS. In any case, this sounds > like either a kernel, firmware or maybe wicked issue. Currently my guess is > the former, so reassigning. > > Do you have packet traces? > Which packages changed between the images? You can narrow that down by > updating the older image to the latest packages in steps. I only did "zypper up kernel-default" and "shutdown -r now" and ended up with an eth0 device in UP state, without an IP address. I could select in GRUB the older kernel and also that one ended up in the same state, device UP, no IP address. I need to restore the whole system to continue with it. Hopefully just two hour work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1178434] VUL-0: CVE-2020-1777,CVE-2020-11023,CVE-2020-11022: otrs: OTRS Security Advisory 2020-15
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178434 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178434#c1 Christian Wittmer <chris(a)computersalat.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #1 from Christian Wittmer <chris(a)computersalat.de> --- WIP -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0