November 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1178458] New: tuned does not have any profiles such as powersave, balanced etc
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178458 Bug ID: 1178458 Summary: tuned does not have any profiles such as powersave, balanced etc Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: ackdor(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 843322 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=843322&action=edit As the description says... I have installed tuned using:- sudo zypper install tuned I have started the daemon using sudo systemctl start tuned when typed sudo tuned-adm profiles the output is Available Profiles: No current active profile It should have basic profiles like powersave, balanced etc I use Tumbleweed. Steps to reproduce:- install tuned start tuned daemon sudo tuned-adm profile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1176033] touchpad don't work on Lenovo IdeaPad 3 (LNV81WE00)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176033 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176033#c13 --- Comment #13 from Alex Alex <sandro.it(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 843349 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=843349&action=edit output hwinfo working -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1176033] touchpad don't work on Lenovo IdeaPad 3 (LNV81WE00)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176033 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176033#c12 --- Comment #12 from Alex Alex <sandro.it(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 843348 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=843348&action=edit output dmesg working -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1155310] xfs_fsr ignores / misinterpretes its -p option
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155310 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155310#c15 --- Comment #15 from Gerben Jansen <gerben.jansen(a)aol.com> --- Hmmmm, i wanted to demonstrate that your fix works, so i first repeated the experiment from comment #5 and then wanted to repeat it with your test repo. However i can't reproduce it anymore. Over time xfs_fsr got upgraded to a newer version. guppy:~ # rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/sbin/xfs_fsr xfsprogs-4.15.0-lp151.7.12.1.x86_64 Trying to reproduce the loop from comment #5: guppy:~ # umount /MyLib guppy:~ # umount /MyDisk guppy:~ # cd /var/tmp guppy:/var/tmp # ls -l .fsrlast_xfs ls: cannot access '.fsrlast_xfs': No such file or directory guppy:/var/tmp # xfs_fsr -p 1 -t 1 xfs_fsr -m /proc/mounts -t 1 -f /var/tmp/.fsrlast_xfs ... / start inode=0 XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=181638: Invalid argument XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=225083: Invalid argument XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=228807: Invalid argument xfs_fsr startpass 0, endpass 0, time 2 seconds guppy:/var/tmp # ls -l .fsrlast_xfs -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Nov 5 21:27 .fsrlast_xfs guppy:/var/tmp # xfs_fsr -p 1 -t 18000 xfs_fsr -m /proc/mounts -t 18000 -f /var/tmp/.fsrlast_xfs ... / start inode=228830 XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=1193026: Invalid argument XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=1207140: Invalid argument /home start inode=0 Completed all 1 passes guppy:/var/tmp # ls -l .fsrlast_xfs ls: cannot access '.fsrlast_xfs': No such file or directory guppy:/var/tmp # mount /MyLib/ guppy:/var/tmp # xfs_fsr -p 1 -t 1 xfs_fsr -m /proc/mounts -t 1 -f /var/tmp/.fsrlast_xfs ... / start inode=0 XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=181638: Invalid argument XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=225083: Invalid argument XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=228807: Invalid argument XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=1193026: Invalid argument XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT failed: ino=1207140: Invalid argument xfs_fsr startpass 0, endpass 0, time 2 seconds guppy:/var/tmp # ls -l .fsrlast_xfs -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20 Nov 5 21:30 .fsrlast_xfs guppy:/var/tmp # cat .fsrlast_xfs /dev/sdb2 0 1543832 guppy:/var/tmp # xfs_fsr -p 1 -t 18000 xfs_fsr -m /proc/mounts -t 18000 -f /var/tmp/.fsrlast_xfs ... / start inode=1543832 /home start inode=0 /MyLib start inode=0 Completed all 1 passes guppy:/var/tmp # cat .fsrlast_xfs cat: .fsrlast_xfs: No such file or directory So the version from xfsprogs-4.15.0-lp151.7.12.1.x86_64 stops after 1 pass as wanted, were the version from xfsprogs-4.15.0-lp151.7.3.1.x86_64 repeated its loop forever. I didn't attempt to run the version from your test repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177008] Major Memory Leak on Any Snapshot from 20200914 to Current
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177008 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177008#c10 --- Comment #10 from Rylee K <adamska156(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #9) > (In reply to Rylee K from comment #8) > > It seems that the issue was a gif wallpaper plugin for KDE. After not using > > the plugin the problem is fixed. > > Which plugin? Can you reproduce the issue easily? It was this plugin https://store.kde.org/p/1339104 However, after completely removing the plugin from my system and reinstalling the latest version of it, it appears to be fixed. Haven't had a problem with it in days now. I can't reproduce it anymore since doing that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177531] xen project hypervisor + drbd -> cannot create "drbd" VBD type vm -reason-> rpm package 'drbd-utils' => /usr/lib/xen/scripts/block-common.sh broken migration to new directory '/usr/lib/xen/scripts/block-drbd'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177531 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177531#c10 --- Comment #10 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2020:3193-1: An update that has one recommended fix can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1177531 CVE References: JIRA References: Sources used: SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for SUSE Manager Server 4.1 (src): drbd-utils-9.13.0-3.6.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability 15-SP2 (src): drbd-utils-9.13.0-3.6.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1178203] sound is broken at 5.3.18-lp152.44-default with Steinberg UR22C card
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178203 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178203#c7 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(matwey.kornilov@g | |mail.com) --- Comment #7 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Could you try a test KMP available at OBS home:tiwai:bsc1178203 repo? http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/bsc1178203/standard/ Just install usb-audio-kmp-default, reboot and retest. It's totally untested and might give a bad result, so just for testing. Once after testing, you can uninstall the KMP again via "zypper rm", and it'll be back again to the original state. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1178275] usb3 device generates lots of command errors
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178275 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178275#c3 --- Comment #3 from James Moe <jimoe(a)sohnen-moe.com> --- > - Does the problem happen with every USB port? > - Is the power sufficient for the device? Yes. Probably. I have moved the disk drive to different ports: two on an add-in card for (4) usb3 ports, one on a mainboard usb3 port. Same results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1178154] AUDIT-0: apparmor: Make reading audit.log as non-root easier
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178154 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178154#c13 Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |SHIP_STOPPER? --- Comment #13 from Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya(a)suse.com> --- Sorry, I should've been clearer on my needinfo. (In reply to Thorsten Kukuk from comment #11) > If other log files (which?) should be owned by the audit group, the name of > the group "audit" would be wrong and we need something better. Yes, this was what was actually being discussed; create a generic ("logaccess", "logging", whatever) group to provide such role for log files. > But I don't see a valid usecase for other log files. Agreed, and now I'm thinking as follows: 1. If we create an "audit" group for audit.log access: this will be the only log file that has such behaviour, and might require future adjustments if other log files demands the same behaviour. Not sure if this justifies such change to fit a very specific use case. 2. If we create a "logging" group for generic log access: user might want the group access to one log file, but not another, so they would still have to manually tweak for each use case -- i.e. trouble is similar as current state. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1171569] AUDIT-1: squid: permissions and location of /usr/sbin/basic_pam_auth
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '20

05 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171569 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171569#c6 --- Comment #6 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1171569) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/846311 Factory / squid -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0