October 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1177656] brltty: missing post requirement on mcookie
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177656 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |mgorse(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177605] Add pam_snapper support to pam-config
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177605 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |kukuk(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177579] wrong clamping of hexadezimal digits in dc (desk calculator)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177579 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |pgajdos(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177629] -mbranch-protection=standard (PAuth + BTI) breaks find-debuginfo.sh
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177629 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177629#c7 Martin Liška <martin.liska(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://sourceware.org/bugz | |illa/show_bug.cgi?id=26734 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <martin.liska(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Guillaume GARDET from comment #6) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > > Btw. do we have another smaller package where you can see the same failure? > > Yes, we have: > * grpc: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Guillaume_G: > PointerAuth:Ring-1/grpc/standard/aarch64 > * pesign: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Guillaume_G: > PointerAuth:Ring-1/pesign/standard/aarch64 Great, using that I created an upstream bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26734 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1106014] cross-arm-none-gcc8-8.1.1+r262873-1.3.x86_64 -mcpu=cortex-m0plus emits incorrect arch
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106014 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106014#c5 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Trescott <matthewtrescott(a)gmail.com> --- For reference, here is an explanation of the problem that led me to this solution: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60464 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1106014] cross-arm-none-gcc8-8.1.1+r262873-1.3.x86_64 -mcpu=cortex-m0plus emits incorrect arch
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106014 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106014#c4 Matthew Trescott <matthewtrescott(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthewtrescott(a)gmail.com OS|openSUSE Factory |All --- Comment #4 from Matthew Trescott <matthewtrescott(a)gmail.com> --- I would guess this is an ARM vs Thumb issue too---in my case integer division was implemented in traditional ARM instructions in the copy of libgcc that is currently shipped with cross-arm-none-gcc, which caused errors when I ran it on my Cortex-M4 micro. You can compile GCC to include the full set of libgcc binaries for different combinations of hard-float, soft-float, armv7, armv8, etc. I haven't tested this yet but I believe it should work (it's roughly the same settings as those used by Debian and the compiled binaries from ARM): osc co openSUSE:Factory/cross-arm-none-gcc10 Edit gcc.spec.in and add %if "%{TARGET_ARCH}" == "arm-none" --enable-multilib \ --disable-decimal-float \ --disable-libffi \ --disable-libgomp \ --disable-libmudflap \ --disable-libquadmath \ --disable-libssp \ --disable-libstdcxx-pch \ --disable-shared \ --disable-threads \ --disable-tls \ --with-multilib-list=rmprofile \ --without-headers \ %endif around line 1303, then run sh pre_checkin.sh 10 osc build --local-package It took over half an hour to compile for me, but in the end the packages will be there in /var/tmp/build-root/openSUSE_Factory/home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64. And the packages have the full set of libgcc binaries in /usr/lib64/gcc/arm-none-eabi/10/thumb. Andreas, after I make sure this works I'd be happy to open a submitrequest on OBS. I'm just not sure whether this is quite the correct approach or not. (For example, should I enable "aprofile" in addition to "rmprofile" as described at https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html ?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177600] [Ten64] DVD Installer fails to bring up DPAA2 network (but NET Installer succeeeds)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177600 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177600#c8 Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(snwint(a)suse.com) | --- Comment #8 from Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint(a)suse.com> --- 'hwinfo --netcard' does not show the interfaces; that's what --network does. --netcard shows the identified network adapters. With these arm socs hwinfo might just miss some parts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1176088] [Jump] openQA test fails, missing systemd-network package
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176088 Max Lin <mlin(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|Leap 15.3 |Jump 15.2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1176088] [Jump] openQA test fails, missing systemd-network package
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176088 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176088#c6 --- Comment #6 from Max Lin <mlin(a)suse.com> --- I'm looking into this issue, let me share my thought here, a) Jump project don't rebuild package from SLE, not like previous Leap version, therefore systemd doesn't get rebuild in Jump, we *re-used* RPM packages from SLE's build. b) networkd stuff(before split off to a separate subpackage) is depend on is_opensuse macro and bcond in systemd, I believe networkd stuff is disabled on SLE build, thus we don't have them in Jump, see a). c) although in the recent maint. update, networkd part was split off to a separate subpackage, but if SLE side hasn't *shipped* it then Jump don't get it still, I'd assume SLE side will not ship it because networkd part is disabled before then should not happen via updates(maybe I'm not correct). Look at the fail test, my thought is if we don't have networkd stuff from SLE's package, openQA test should adopt to that, see test code[1], it assumed systemd-networkd service and networkctl command is available on any openSUSE system, but it isn't true for Jump. [1] https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/blob/4255db84e00… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1177506] [Migration][Build 209.2] openQA test fails in register_system - http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/SUSE:/SLE-15-SP2 is not existed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177506 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177506#c12 --- Comment #12 from Max Lin <mlin(a)suse.com> --- If I understand this correct, the repo openSUSE_Jump_15.2.1_x86_64:SLE-15-SP2-Updates: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/SUSE:/SLE-15-SP2:/Update/standard was added by scc after the system registration, however the URL is wrong, according to the previous Leap migration, new repos should point to updates.suse.com, eg. 8 | SUSE_Linux_Enterprise_Server_15_x86_64:SLE-Product-SLES15-Pool | SLE-Product-SLES15-Pool | Yes | (r ) Yes | No | 99 | rpm-md | https://updates.suse.com/SUSE/Products/SLE-Product-SLES/15/xxxxxxxx | SUSE_Linux_Enterprise_Server_15_x86_64 and its friends sources/debuginfo, etc. Therefore I think neither http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/SUSE:/SLE-15-SP2:/Update/standard nor http://download.opensuse.org/update/jump/15.2/(it's about updates content, not for migrate to SLE) is needed to be there for migration, no, they shouldn't, and any d.o.o repos should be disabled during migration and be removed after migration, that is also our official upgrade document noted[1]. IMO the question is why do SLE repos(point to https://updates.suse.com) aren't added but wrong repo was, and we have to fix that. [1] https://documentation.suse.com/sles/15-SP1/single-html/SLES-upgrade/#sec-up… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0