January 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1159881] [wish] Pre-installaton summary misses partition info
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159881 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159881#c4 Jiri Srain <jsrain(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jsrain(a)suse.com) | --- Comment #4 from Jiri Srain <jsrain(a)suse.com> --- Moving the partitioning to a separate step in fact made it more prominent. Allowing to display the information is not that hard; changing it is the harder piece (it impacts bootloader configuration, you packages may not fit any more, etc.). One link will not really help - you need to click it actively to show info you want to review; do you expect users to do so if they had the full picture about partitioning shown few steps back? If you wanted to put it "unpacked", where? To the bottom? Not everyone will scroll down. To the top? Why should I need to scroll to change something I could not change any before? IMO: We should not repeat settings which have a separate step, which is clearly more prominent than being hidden in the full summary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1159954] libredwg: update to v0.9.3
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159954 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159954#c1 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh(a)inai.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh(a)inai.de> --- Already in progress (759940) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1154080 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1154080] libredwg: update to v0.9 (beta)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154080 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154080#c4 --- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh(a)inai.de> --- *** Bug 1159954 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1159877] [wish] Do not restart automatically after installation
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159877 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159877#c12 Jiri Srain <jsrain(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jsrain(a)suse.com) | --- Comment #12 from Jiri Srain <jsrain(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Josef Reidinger from comment #8) > jiri - do you remember reasoning for that timeout? And what is the way to > initiate such reevaluate? I guess that the current behavior is with SUSE longer than I am. I can see the value of the time-out that it allows me to stop the process at the end and grab the logs if needed (for reporting another bug). Removing the time-out and rebooting imeedately - I don't see any use case except saving those 10 seconds. If we want to do any change, I suggest not to add it to the UI, but stick with the command-line; I don't expect current behavior to be any issue for the majority of users, but rather something for a specific customers. BTW: IIRC, AutoYaST has its means to control what should happen after installation - for unattended mass deployments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1158727] New: GCC 10: openblas build fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1158727 Bug ID: 1158727 Summary: GCC 10: openblas build fails Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: martin.liska(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Fails with: [ 927s] Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference. [ 927s] [ 927s] Backtrace for this error: [ 927s] #0 0x7fb8c1f7ab70 in ??? [ 927s] #1 0x7fb8c1f79dc5 in ??? [ 927s] #2 0x7fb8c224c6cf in ??? [ 927s] #3 0x55fb40db374f in cdotc_.constprop.0 [ 927s] at /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/OpenBLAS-0.3.7/test/zdot.c:67 [ 927s] #4 0x55fb410c075e in check2_ [ 927s] at /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/OpenBLAS-0.3.7/test/cblat1.f:493 [ 927s] #5 0x55fb410c075e in cblat1 [ 927s] at /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/OpenBLAS-0.3.7/test/cblat1.f:36 [ 927s] #6 0x55fb40da9b60 in main [ 927s] at /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/OpenBLAS-0.3.7/test/cblat1.f:47 [ 927s] make[1]: *** [Makefile:10: level1] Segmentation fault [ 927s] make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... It's a known upstream issue: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/2336 Let me cherry pick the commit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1158192] New: GCC 10: libxcrypto build fails on i586
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1158192 Bug ID: 1158192 Summary: GCC 10: libxcrypto build fails on i586 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: martin.liska(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Fails with: [ 70s] alg-yescrypt-opt.c: In function 'blockmix_salsa8': [ 70s] alg-yescrypt-opt.c:280:20: error: inlining failed in call to 'salsa20': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached [-Werror=inline] [ 70s] 280 | static inline void salsa20(salsa20_blk_t *restrict B, [ 70s] | ^~~~~~~ [ 70s] alg-yescrypt-opt.c:364:2: note: called from here [ 70s] 364 | salsa20(&X, &out, 4); [ 70s] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ 70s] alg-yescrypt-opt.c:383:3: note: in expansion of macro 'SALSA20_8_XOR_MEM' [ 70s] 383 | SALSA20_8_XOR_MEM(Bin[i * 2 + 1], Bout[r + i]) [ 70s] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ 70s] alg-yescrypt-opt.c:280:20: error: inlining failed in call to 'salsa20': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached [-Werror=inline] [ 70s] 280 | static inline void salsa20(salsa20_blk_t *restrict B, [ 70s] | ^~~~~~~ [ 70s] alg-yescrypt-opt.c:364:2: note: called from here [ 70s] 364 | salsa20(&X, &out, 4); [ 70s] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ 70s] alg-yescrypt-opt.c:382:3: note: in expansion of macro 'SALSA20_8_XOR_MEM' [ 70s] 382 | SALSA20_8_XOR_MEM(Bin[i * 2], Bout[i]) [ 70s] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ 70s] alg-yescrypt-opt.c: In function 'blockmix_salsa8_xor': [ 70s] alg-yescrypt-opt.c:280:20: error: inlining failed in call to 'salsa20': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached [-Werror=inline] [ 70s] 280 | static inline void salsa20(salsa20_blk_t *restrict B, GCC upstream bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92749 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1159936] ypbind fails to start after boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159936 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159936#c1 Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk(a)suse.com> --- ypbind is a server tool designed for systems who are always online, not for Desktop systems with NetworkManager. Your hack will solve the problem for the first start, but not if you change networks, networks don't provide NIS informations via dhcp, and so on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1159876] Pandoc regression when creating epubs
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159876 Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alynx.zhou(a)suse.com Assignee|bnc-team-screening(a)forge.pr |sbahling(a)suse.com |ovo.novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1159971] Printing does not remember paper tray on updated LO
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159971 Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alynx.zhou(a)suse.com Assignee|bnc-team-screening(a)forge.pr |tchvatal(a)suse.com |ovo.novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1159969] gnome-subtitles needs update to v1.6
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159969 Alynx Zhou <alynx.zhou(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alynx.zhou(a)suse.com Assignee|bnc-team-screening(a)forge.pr |os.gnome.maintainers@gmail. |ovo.novell.com |com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0