June 2019 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1105654] New: mesa-dri-nouveau: Incorrect description when confirming the package license
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1105654 Bug ID: 1105654 Summary: mesa-dri-nouveau: Incorrect description when confirming the package license Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: lgrimmer(a)suse.com QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- During the initial installation on my physical system using the openSUSE-Tumbleweed-NET-x86_64-Snapshot20180818-Media.iso image, I receive a popup window with the following title: "Confirm Package License: Mesa-dri-nouveau" The last paragraph of the message that is displayed here (which isn't actually a "license", but rather a warning/disclaimer) reads: 'Please click "Accept" if you accept the risks that may come with the installation of this driver. Choose "Cancel" to prevent installation of the driver and use software emulation instead.' However, the popup window does not provide any buttons with these labels - they are labeled "I Agree" and "I Disagree". I guess the text of that message should probably be updated to reflect this change (and eventually any other package that contains a similar message?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1042287] New: [Build 20170601] openQA test fails in enlightenment_first_start
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1042287 Bug ID: 1042287 Summary: [Build 20170601] openQA test fails in enlightenment_first_start Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: http://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/413072/modules/enligh tenment_first_start/steps/12 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: X11 Applications Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: fvogt(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The description text is missing. ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-NET-x86_64-otherDE_enlightenment@64bit fails in [enlightenment_first_start](http://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/413072/modules/… ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20170601](http://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/412884) ## Expected result Last good: [20170529](http://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/411282) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](http://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?machine=64bit&flavor=NET&te… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1122683] New: osc: deprecate insecure APIs
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 24 Feb '22

24 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122683 Bug ID: 1122683 Summary: osc: deprecate insecure APIs Classification: Internal Novell Products Product: openSUSE Build Service Version: master Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: osc Assignee: adrian(a)suse.com Reporter: malte.kraus(a)suse.com QA Contact: adrian(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- >From bnc#1119444: > > The OSC client has some vulnerable code in it, that it doesn't use itself but provides as a library to plugins. In one case there's even a comment explicitly marking this as insecure, but are not removed due to compatibility concerns. If not breaking backwards compatibility under any circumstances is that important, I recommend adding deprecation warnings (https://docs.python.org/2.6/library/warnings.html#temporarily-suppressing-w…) to move plugins over to secure APIs. > > Can you create a dedicated request for this? Specifically, the 'unpack_srcrpm' function has such a warning as a comment. Also, 'Ar.saveTo', 'CpioRead.copyin' can be made to store files in arbitrary locations if the archive they parsed contain a filename starting with a "/". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1122778] New: x11 pattern recommends YaST and x11_opt
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 24 Feb '22

24 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122778 Bug ID: 1122778 Summary: x11 pattern recommends YaST and x11_opt Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Patterns Assignee: dimstar(a)opensuse.org Reporter: fvogt(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: simonf.lees(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- When installing with recommends enabled, these patterns are always pulled in with x11 (unless locks are used): * x11_opt * x11_opt -> enhanced_base * x11_opt -> enhanced_base -> apparmor * x11_opt -> enhanced_base -> enhanced_base_opt * x11_opt -> enhanced_base -> sw_management * x11_opt -> enhanced_base -> yast2_basis * x11_opt -> fonts * x11_opt -> fonts -> fonts_opt ... and over Supplements which also pulls in other patterns. That makes it highly impractical to have a user-friendly option to not install "everything and the kitchen sink" without either locking the pattern metapackages (which nobody knows about and they really shouldn't need to) or disabling recommends (which breaks stuff severely). This needs to be fixed by either removing quite a few of those cross-pattern recommends or changing the way patterns are managed in yast (deselection adds a lock). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 1087824] New: Installer picks obsolete mirror
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 24 Feb '22

24 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087824 Bug ID: 1087824 Summary: Installer picks obsolete mirror Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: i686 OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: jdelvare(a)suse.com QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- I am trying to install Tumbleweed/i586 from France. download.opensuse.org redirects me to mirrors.standaloneinstaller.com which is out of date: Index of /opensuse-stable/tumbleweed/repo/oss/boot/i386 Name Last modified Size ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Parent Directory cracklib-dict-full.rpm 2017-05-27 18:14 3.1M yast2-trans-de.rpm 2017-10-12 01:59 643K yast2-trans-en_US.rpm 2017-10-12 01:59 95K This results in an error message: Digest verification failed. Checking for the list of openSUSE mirror sites (https://mirrors.opensuse.org/list/tumbleweed.html), this mirror is not listed as hosting any Tumbleweed contents. According to the list, the only mirror in France for Tumbleweed is fr2.rpmfind.net. If I manually select this mirror at the beginning of the installation, the error does not happen. download.opensuse.org should only redirect Tumbleweed users to mirrors with up-to-date Tumbleweed contents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 9

[Bug 1073845] New: python-attrs andpython-pluggy form a build cycle together
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Feb '22

18 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1073845 Bug ID: 1073845 Summary: python-attrs andpython-pluggy form a build cycle together Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The two packages python-attrs and python-pluggy cause trouble for bootstrapping a distro, since they depend on each other to build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1036979] New: python2-qt4 posttrans fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1036979 Bug ID: 1036979 Summary: python2-qt4 posttrans fails Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: mrueckert(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Output of python2-qt4-4.12-3.1.x86_64.rpm %posttrans script: /var/adm/update-scripts/posttransLsYXyp/python2-qt4-4.12-3.1.x86_64.rpmpbKPGQ: line 6: syntax error: unexpected end of file Warning: python2-qt4-4.12-3.1.x86_64.rpm %posttrans script failed (returned 2) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1017682] New: VUL-0: CVE-2016-10091: UnRTF: stack-based buffer overflows in cmd_* functions
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1017682 Bug ID: 1017682 Summary: VUL-0: CVE-2016-10091: UnRTF: stack-based buffer overflows in cmd_* functions Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE3 Assignee: anixx(a)opensuse.org Reporter: mikhail.kasimov(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Ref: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/786 =============================================== Hi As reported by "Skylake" in the Debian bugtracker[1], UnRTF is prone to stack-based buffer overflows in various cmd_* functions. I've found a Stack-based buffer overflow in unrtf 0.21.9, which affects three functions including: cmd_expand, cmd_emboss and cmd_engrave. # convert.c static int cmd_expand (Word *w, int align, char has_param, int param) { char str[10]; if (has_param) { sprintf(str, "%d", param/4); // Overflow, 9-digit negative value triggers the bug if (!param) attr_pop(ATTR_EXPAND); else attr_push(ATTR_EXPAND, str); } return FALSE; } Apparently writing a negative integer to the buffer can trigger the overflow (Minus sign needs an extra byte). * How to trigger the bug * $ echo "\expnd-400000000" > poc $ unrtf poc A preliminary patch can be found in the Debian bugtracker, but it is not yet finalized. Could you assign (a?) CVE as needed? Does one CVE suffice here, since same class of issue in various cmd_* functions from one reporter? Whilest, at least in Debian, unrtf is compiled with FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 and the buffer overflows are detected, at least if any exposed application uses unrtf to process untrusted input, this might lead to a denial-of-service. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/849705 Regards, Salvatore =============================================== https://software.opensuse.org/package/unrtf TW: KDE:KDE3: 0.21.5 42.2: KDE:Extra: 0.21.5 and KDE:KDE3: 0.21.8 42.1: KDE:Extra: 0.21.5 and KDE:KDE3: 0.21.8 13.2: KDE:Extra: 0.21.5 and KDE:KDE3: 0.21.8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 906594] New: Apper showing wrong package description
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=906594 Bug ID: 906594 Summary: Apper showing wrong package description Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: NO 13.2 BUGS!! Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Applications Assignee: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: erwin.vandevelde(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Apper shows the package's description when clicking on it, but only for the first package you click on this is done correctly. Apper shows the same description again and again for each other package you click on. Versions: apper 0.9.1-2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1121852] New: python3-base: LICENSE in wrong directory
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121852 Bug ID: 1121852 Summary: python3-base: LICENSE in wrong directory Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: mcepl(a)suse.com Reporter: kukuk(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The default directory for licenses are /usr/share/licenses. That's where users and tools look today for licenses. python3-base changes the default path of %license to /usr/share/doc for no good reason. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 14