June 2019 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1041742] New: Filetriggers do not fire (reliably)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 25 Oct '22

25 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1041742 Bug ID: 1041742 Summary: Filetriggers do not fire (reliably) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: libzypp Assignee: zypp-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- In GNOME:Next, we started experimenting with file triggers (with the goal to lower the number of bugs based on missing post scripts) As a sample, I implemented this trigger (on glib2-tools): %transfiletriggerin -n glib2-tools -- %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas %{_bindir}/glib-compile-schemas %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas %transfiletriggerpostun -n glib2-tools -- %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas %{_bindir}/glib-compile-schemas %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas The trigger is confirmed to work, but in some cases, it seems not to fire, eg on the package 'gdm' (which is currently the reason why http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME:/Medias/images/iso/?P=GNOME… fails to boot to desktop) zypper in --no-recommends gdm => the file trigger is not executed rpm -i gdm-3.24.1.rpm => the trigger actually seems to work (which is why I file it against libzypp) This currently stops us from moving forward and proposing file triggers to be more widely used (even though I think they can solve quite some packaging bugs) The packages in question for testing are all in the GNOME:Next repository (glib2 which has the trigger, it has the %glib2_gsettings_schema_post set to %nil, so packages that use it in their post script only get a dummy - once the implementation is complete, we will of course go and clean those out completely) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 28

[Bug 1139369] New: multipath-tools: post-0.8.1 upstream bug fixes
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 24 Oct '22

24 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139369 Bug ID: 1139369 Summary: multipath-tools: post-0.8.1 upstream bug fixes Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: martin.wilck(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Upstream multipath-tools fixes from dm-devel, post 0.8.1 1) libmultipath: make vector_foreach_slot_backwards work as expected - Matters only for foreign/NVMe code (also for "multipath -W", but without user noticeable impact) => Factory/SLE15-SP1 only QA test case: Use NVMe native multipath and run multipathd. Remove one or more NVMe paths. => multipathd crashes. 2) multipathd: fix REALLOC_REPLY with max length reply - fix for cd5a9797e "libmpathcmd(coverity): limit reply length" - Factory/SLE15-SP1 only, the others don't contain the broken commit QA test case: None, corner case which occurs only if a client command gets a reply with >= 32768 bytes. 3) multipath: call store_pathinfo with DI_BLACKLIST - performance; cli_add_path() may add blacklisted path - Factory, SLE15, SLE15-SP1, SLE12-SP3/4 QA test case: Blacklist some paths (by any mechanism other than devnode). Verify that "multipathd show paths" doesn't list the blacklisted devices Run "multipathd add path $X" where $X is one of the blacklisted paths. => ok (expected: fail with msg "blacklisted"). 4) multipathd: fix client response for socket activation - minor corner-case fix - Factory/SLE15-SP1 only QA test case: stop multipathd on a system with some multipath maps. Run "multipathd show topology" => success with empty output (expected: success with correct topology output) 5) libmultipath: get_prio(): really don't reset prio for inaccessible paths - Factory, SLE15, SLE12-SP4, SLE15-SP1 QA test case: perhaps reproducible with a setup with lots of pass loss/reinstate events, by monitoring the topology with "group_by_prio". It's a rare condition though which happens only if a path becomes inaccessible in the small time windw between the state check and the get_prio() call in pathinfo(). See bug 1118495. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 15

[Bug 1093168] New: pacemaker: using service template in preun/postun
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 24 Oct '22

24 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093168 Bug ID: 1093168 Summary: pacemaker: using service template in preun/postun Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: High Availability Assignee: ha-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: ro(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- you can not used a service template (foo@.service) without parameter in a specfile with the %service_add/del macros: %preun cts %service_del_preun pacemaker-cts-dummyd@.service %postun cts %service_del_postun pacemaker-cts-dummyd@.service this will just result in errors during uninstall of the package: (1/1) Removing pacemaker-cts-1.1.18+20180430.b12c320f5-1.4.noarch ........[done] Additional rpm output: Failed to stop pacemaker-cts-dummyd@.service: Unit name pacemaker-cts-dummyd@.service is missing the instance name. See system logs and 'systemctl status pacemaker-cts-dummyd@.service' for details. Failed to get load state of pacemaker-cts-dummyd@.service: Unit name pacemaker-cts-dummyd@.service is neither a valid invocation ID nor unit name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1115512] New: pam-config does not find (nor load) pam_yubico.so
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 24 Oct '22

24 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1115512 Bug ID: 1115512 Summary: pam-config does not find (nor load) pam_yubico.so Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: fred.blaise(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:62.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0 Build Identifier: After installed pam_yubico, and adding the following line in /etc/pam.d/common-auth, running `sudo pam-config --update` fails with `/etc/pam.d/common-auth-pc: Unknown module pam_yubico.so, ignored!` The module never appears in the --list-modules either. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. sudo zypper in pam_yubico 2. sudo ldconfig (or reboot) 3. Amend /etc/pam.d/common-auth-pc to add pam_yubico as requirement 4. Run pam-config --update and get ignore message. Actual Results: /etc/pam.d/common-auth-pc: Unknown module pam_yubico.so, ignored! Expected Results: Module loads and I can use my yubikey with pam. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1088177] New: Default Active Titlebar color on openSUSEdark and openSUSEdarkalternate colorchemes
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 23 Oct '22

23 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088177 Bug ID: 1088177 Summary: Default Active Titlebar color on openSUSEdark and openSUSEdarkalternate colorchemes Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: andretiago(a)outlook.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 766009 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=766009&action=edit Titlebar active color Default Active Titlebar color of openSUSEdark and openSUSEdarkalternate color schemes looks out of place and it's hard to read. https://i.imgur.com/vshYSxz.png I think the default color should be replaced -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1008674] New: Login difficulties with LightDM 1.20
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 22 Oct '22

22 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008674 Bug ID: 1008674 Summary: Login difficulties with LightDM 1.20 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: SUSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: Markus.Elfring(a)web.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Today I dared to update the display manager to the version “LightDM 1.20.0-1.1”. Unfortunately, I observed that the corresponding graphical login did not work as expected. The information “exist status: 1” was recorded in the systemd journal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 10

[Bug 1102216] New: Game area is black in KBreakout 18.04.3.
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 22 Oct '22

22 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102216 Bug ID: 1102216 Summary: Game area is black in KBreakout 18.04.3. Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: SUSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Applications Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: Markus.Elfring(a)web.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- I installed the software “kbreakout 18.04.3-1.1” also on my system. Now I notice that the game area is displayed only in black while my terminal window (where I started this program for another test try) is filled with the message “QQuickWidget cannot be used as a native child widget. Consider setting Qt::AA_DontCreateNativeWidgetSiblings” in a XFCE session. Will any updates appear for a bug report like “Kbreakout 15.11.90 just shows black area where game should be”? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356736 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1134131] New: AUDIT-0: deepin-file-manager: new polkit actions of deepin-file-manager
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 19 Oct '22

19 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1134131 Bug ID: 1134131 Summary: AUDIT-0: deepin-file-manager: new polkit actions of deepin-file-manager Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: All OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: hillwoodroc(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 804187 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=804187&action=edit com.deepin.pkexec.usb-device-formatter.policy Please check them, thanks! [ 556s] deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) com.deepin.filemanager.daemon.NewCopyJob (auth_admin:auth_admin:auth_admin) [ 556s] deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) com.deepin.filemanager.daemon.NewCreateFolderJob (auth_admin:auth_admin:auth_admin) [ 556s] deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) com.deepin.filemanager.daemon.NewCreateTemplateFileJob (auth_admin:auth_admin:auth_admin) [ 556s] deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) com.deepin.filemanager.daemon.NewDeleteJob (auth_admin:auth_admin:auth_admin) [ 556s] deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) com.deepin.filemanager.daemon.NewMoveJob (auth_admin:auth_admin:auth_admin) [ 556s] deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) com.deepin.filemanager.daemon.NewRenameJob (auth_admin:auth_admin:auth_admin) [ 556s] deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: polkit-untracked-privilege (Badness: 10) com.deepin.pkexec.dde-file-manager (auth_admin:auth_admin:auth_admin_keep) [ 556s] The privilege is not listed in /etc/polkit-default-privs.* which makes it [ 556s] harder for admins to find. Furthermore polkit authorization checks can easily [ 556s] introduce security issues. If the package is intended for inclusion in any [ 556s] SUSE product please open a bug report to request review of the package by the [ 556s] security team. Please refer to [ 556s] https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Package_security_guidelines#audit_bugs for [ 556s] more information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 8

[Bug 1134132] New: AUDIT-0: deepin-file-manager: new dbus of deepin-file-manager
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 19 Oct '22

19 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1134132 Bug ID: 1134132 Summary: AUDIT-0: deepin-file-manager: new dbus of deepin-file-manager Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: All OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: security-team(a)suse.de Reporter: hillwoodroc(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 804190 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=804190&action=edit dbus-1 profiles of deepin-file-manager Please check them, thanks! This project is at https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/X11:Deepin:Factory/deepin-file-mana… [ 556s] deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: suse-dbus-unauthorized-service (Badness: 10) /etc/dbus-1/system.d/com.deepin.filemanager.daemon.conf [ 556s] deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: suse-dbus-unauthorized-service (Badness: 10) /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/com.deepin.filemanager.daemon.service [ 556s] The package installs a DBUS system service file. If the package is intended [ 556s] for inclusion in any SUSE product please open a bug report to request review [ 556s] of the service by the security team. Please refer to [ 556s] https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Package_security_guidelines#audit_bugs for [ 556s] more information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1098184] New: systemd unit files for cfengine contain incorrect path
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Oct '22

18 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098184 Bug ID: 1098184 Summary: systemd unit files for cfengine contain incorrect path Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: aeszter(a)gwdg.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- With the update to cfengine 3.11, CFE binaries moved to /usr/bin. However, unit files still point to /usr/sbin. Problem also exists in Factory and systemsmanagement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1