April 2019 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1006958] New: gdb build often stalls on OBS
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1006958 Bug ID: 1006958 Summary: gdb build often stalls on OBS Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- gdb is among the list of packages that often cause a stall in OBS - OBS detects this after a while and cancels the build. The issue though is that unreliable builds are a pain and must not happen (especially when being a ring package; it is built very often in the stagings and every fail requires the staging managers to interact) The current fail I have here stops with: <[ 6299s] Running target unix/-m32/-fPIC/-pie >[ 6299s] Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target. >[ 6299s] Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target. >[ 6299s] Using /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/gdb/testsuite/config/unix.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. >[ 6299s] Running /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.xml/tdesc-arch.exp ... >[ 6299s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/build-x86_64-suse-linux/gdb/gdb version 7.11.1 -nw -nx -data-directory /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/build-x86_64-suse-linux/gdb/testsuite.unix.-m32.-fPIC.-pie/../data-directory >[ 6299s] >[ 6299s] >[ 6299s] === gdb Summary === >[ 6299s] >[ 6299s] # of expected passes 8 >[ 6300s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/build-x86_64-suse-linux/gdb/gdb version 7.11.1 -nw -nx -data-directory /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.11.1/build-x86_64-suse-linux/gdb/testsuite.unix.-m32.-fPIC.-pie/../data-directory >[ 6300s] >[35104s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER END ### >[35104s] No buildstatus set, either the base system is broken (kernel/initrd/udev/glibc/bash/perl) >[35104s] or the build host has a kernel or hardware problem... > > >Job seems to be stuck here, killed. (after 28800 seconds of inactivity) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 993011] New: [openQA] CTRL-ALT-DEL does not show the logout dialog
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=993011 Bug ID: 993011 Summary: [openQA] CTRL-ALT-DEL does not show the logout dialog Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Seen by openQA tests, e.g. https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/239654 After the system was upgraded from openSUSE 13.2 to Tumbleweed (20160808, first to have plasma 5.7.2), the logout dialog no longer shows when pressing ctrl-alt-del This appears on updates performed using the DVD and boot from the Network CD, but seems not to happen in the case when the system was updated using zdup. The tests had been re-run a couple times. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 941884] New: libcamgm fails test suite due to expired certificates
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=941884 Bug ID: 941884 Summary: libcamgm fails test suite due to expired certificates Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201505* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- since recently, libcamgm no longer passes the test suite... the build lo ends with: [...] [ 358s] Running ListTest... [ 358s] Output doesn't match expected data: [ 358s] --- ./single.out/ListTest.out 2014-04-12 17:19:43.000000000 +0000 [ 358s] +++ ./single.out/out/ListTest.out 2015-08-16 18:11:50.226671071 +0000 [ 358s] @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ [ 358s] country = DE [ 358s] emailAddress = suse(a)suse.de [ 358s] serial = 07 [ 358s] -status = Valid [ 358s] +status = Expired [ 358s] New Entry [ 358s] certificate = 08:40717a16174dc4d516f6fa7ee8eeb18c-1124792802 [ 358s] commonName = Full Test Certificate [ 358s] @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ [ 358s] country = DE [ 358s] emailAddress = suse(a)suse.de [ 358s] serial = 0B [ 358s] -status = Valid [ 358s] +status = Expired [ 358s] getCertificateList successfully executed [ 358s] =================== end List tests ======================== [ 358s] DONE [ 358s] FAIL: ListTest [...] [ 364s] Running VerifyTest... [ 365s] Output doesn't match expected data: [ 365s] --- ./single.out/VerifyTest.out 2014-04-12 17:19:43.000000000 +0000 [ 365s] +++ ./single.out/out/VerifyTest.out 2015-08-16 18:11:57.086773026 +0000 [ 365s] @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ [ 365s] 04: Verify failed: Found revoked certificate [ 365s] 05: Verify failed: Found revoked certificate [ 365s] 06: Verify failed: Found revoked certificate [ 365s] -07: Verify success [ 365s] +07: Verify failed: Found expired certificate [ 365s] 08: Verify failed: Found expired certificate [ 365s] 09: Verify failed: Found revoked certificate [ 365s] 0A: Verify failed: Found expired certificate [ 365s] -0B: Verify success [ 365s] +0B: Verify failed: Found expired certificate [ 365s] =================== end List tests ======================== [ 365s] DONE [ 365s] FAIL: VerifyTest [...] libcamgm is a dependency to yast2-ca-management, which in turn is required by yast2-auth-server (which is why a delete request for libcamgm back in May could not be fullfilled) This whole thing is a ring, packae, causing all stagings to fail, hence I mark it major -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 6

[Bug 1002565] New: can't install ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002565 Bug ID: 1002565 Summary: can't install ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- can't install ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 zypper in ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Resolving package dependencies... >Problem: nothing provides rubygem(ruby:2.2.0:commander) < 4.3.0 needed by ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 > Solution 1: do not install ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-testsuite-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 > Solution 2: break ruby2.2-rubygem-rhc-1.35.3-1.5.x86_64 by ignoring some of its dependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1066408] New: Deadbeef contains an invalid appdata.xml file
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1066408 Bug ID: 1066408 Summary: Deadbeef contains an invalid appdata.xml file Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The package deadbeef ships with an appdata.xml file (to show in socftware centers), but the file is invalid. (appstream-builder:17416): As-WARNING **: ignoring description '<description><_p>DeaDBeeF (as in 0xDEADBEEF)…' from ./tmp/deadbeef-0.7.2-4.2/usr/share/appdata/deadbeef.appdata.xml: Unknown tag '_p' Seems upstream prepared the file for translation, but then did not pass it through the translation process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1023737] New: openSUSE:Factory/golang-google-golangorg-appengine fails to build
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1023737 Bug ID: 1023737 Summary: openSUSE:Factory/golang-google-golangorg-appengine fails to build Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The package golang-google-golangorg-appengine fails to build in openSUSE:Factory. Earlier notifications by email to the bugowner and Maintainer have remained without reaction / fix. If the package is not being fixed within 2 weeks, it will be scheduled for removal from Tumbleweed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1023734] New: openSUSE:Factory/golang-org-x-oauth2 fails to build
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1023734 Bug ID: 1023734 Summary: openSUSE:Factory/golang-org-x-oauth2 fails to build Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The package golang-org-x-oauth2 fails to build in openSUSE:Factory. Earlier notifications by email to the bugowner and Maintainer have remained without reaction / fix. If the package is not being fixed within 2 weeks, it will be scheduled for removal from Tumbleweed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 971006] New: rpmlint: no-dependency-on perl-base 5.22.1
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Oct '22

26 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=971006 Bug ID: 971006 Summary: rpmlint: no-dependency-on perl-base 5.22.1 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: 2015* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- rpmlint does not understand how openSUSE specifies perl dependencies and falsly reports: no-dependency-on perl-base 5.22.1 in openSUSE, we use the macro %perl_requires which translates to: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) It would be great to get this recognized as dependency being satisfied -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1132118] New: Xindy does not run due to incompatible CLISP runtime
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 25 Oct '22

25 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1132118 Bug ID: 1132118 Summary: Xindy does not run due to incompatible CLISP runtime Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: 64bit OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: christian-david(a)web.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- xindy does not run what can be tested with $ xindy --version xindy release: 2.5.1 xindy script version: 1.18 /usr/lib64/clisp-2.49.92/base/lisp.run: initialization file `/usr/lib64/xindy/xindy.mem' was not created by this version of CLISP runtime Same error happens if xindy is used for a “real” task. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 13

[Bug 1041742] New: Filetriggers do not fire (reliably)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 25 Oct '22

25 Oct '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1041742 Bug ID: 1041742 Summary: Filetriggers do not fire (reliably) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: libzypp Assignee: zypp-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- In GNOME:Next, we started experimenting with file triggers (with the goal to lower the number of bugs based on missing post scripts) As a sample, I implemented this trigger (on glib2-tools): %transfiletriggerin -n glib2-tools -- %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas %{_bindir}/glib-compile-schemas %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas %transfiletriggerpostun -n glib2-tools -- %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas %{_bindir}/glib-compile-schemas %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas The trigger is confirmed to work, but in some cases, it seems not to fire, eg on the package 'gdm' (which is currently the reason why http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME:/Medias/images/iso/?P=GNOME… fails to boot to desktop) zypper in --no-recommends gdm => the file trigger is not executed rpm -i gdm-3.24.1.rpm => the trigger actually seems to work (which is why I file it against libzypp) This currently stops us from moving forward and proposing file triggers to be more widely used (even though I think they can solve quite some packaging bugs) The packages in question for testing are all in the GNOME:Next repository (glib2 which has the trigger, it has the %glib2_gsettings_schema_post set to %nil, so packages that use it in their post script only get a dummy - once the implementation is complete, we will of course go and clean those out completely) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 28