September 2018 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 941931] New: GRUB2 graphical menu is extremely slow
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 19 Apr '22

19 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=941931 Bug ID: 941931 Summary: GRUB2 graphical menu is extremely slow Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201505* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Bootloader Assignee: jsrain(a)suse.com Reporter: jmatejek(a)suse.com QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 643998 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=643998&action=edit screen showing output of vbeinfo i'm using an AMD GPU and a 2560x1440 native display. on this configuration, the GRUB2 UI is slow to the point of unusability; it takes a full second to flip from one menu item to another, 3-5s just to display the boot menu, before booting starts. drawing the chameleon logo is visible line-by-line, too lowering the resolution helps, at 1280x960x32 the speed is almost usable, 1280x960x16 is sluggish but OK (so i'm sticking with this resolution for now) my GPU is reported as follows: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cape Verde XT [Radeon HD 7770/8760 / R7 250X] detected graphics modes are attached -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 16

[Bug 1098354] New: VUL-0: CVE-2018-1002209: quazip: arbitrary file write vulnerability achieved by using a specially crafted zip archive
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Apr '22

18 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098354 Bug ID: 1098354 Summary: VUL-0: CVE-2018-1002209: quazip: arbitrary file write vulnerability achieved by using a specially crafted zip archive Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other URL: https://smash.suse.de/issue/208490/ OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: crrodriguez(a)opensuse.org Reporter: abergmann(a)suse.com QA Contact: security-team(a)suse.de Found By: Security Response Team Blocker: --- rh#1593011 A vulnerability has been found in the way developers have implemented the archive extraction of files. An arbitrary file write vulnerability, that can be achieved using a specially crafted zip archive (affects other archives as well, bzip2, tar,xz, war, cpio, 7z), that holds path traversal filenames. So when the filename gets concatenated to the target extraction directory, the final path ends up outside of the target folder. Of course if an executable or a configuration file is overwritten with a file containing malicious code, the problem can turn into an arbitrary code execution issue quite easily. This affects multiple libraries that lacks of a high level APIs that provide the archive extraction functionality. References: https://snyk.io/research/zip-slip-vulnerability References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593011 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2018-1002209 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1101663] New: The %_jvmjardir macro is missing from the javapackages-tools package
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101663 Bug ID: 1101663 Summary: The %_jvmjardir macro is missing from the javapackages-tools package Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Java Assignee: tchvatal(a)suse.com Reporter: mls(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- While cleaning up obsolete macros in rpm I found that all javapackage macros are now in the javapackages-tools package except %_jvmjardir. %_jvmjardir seems to be used in a couple of packages, so it would be good if that macro also is included in javapackages-tools. The current definition is: %_jvmjardir %{_libdir}/jvm-exports -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1071230] New: java installs symlinks that are not owned by a package
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071230 Bug ID: 1071230 Summary: java installs symlinks that are not owned by a package Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Java Assignee: bnc-team-java(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- java packages install e.g /usr/bin/keytool managed by update-alternatives but those files are not owned by any package. Since the symlink in /usr does not actually change it should be owned by a package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 994084] New: Tracker bug: make packages own their symlinks in /etc/alternatives/*
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994084 Bug ID: 994084 Summary: Tracker bug: make packages own their symlinks in /etc/alternatives/* Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: vcuadradojuan(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- This is a tracker bug for making all packages using update-alternatives own their symlinks at `/etc/alternatives/*`. Problem: Currently there is a mix of owned and not owned files by packages in `/etc/alternatives/*` (just look at `rpm -qf /etc/alternatives/*`). Currently there seems to be a sizeable chunk of packages not declaring `%ghost %_sysconfdir/alternatives/<binary>`, as specified at [1]. Also, see discussion on opensuse-factory m-l [2]. Once the mass bug filling for the issue is done, I will wait until 1 October for maintainers to action on the bugs, and afterwards I will start fixing each package by hand. Cheers, [1] https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Multiple_Version_guidelines [2] https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2016-08/msg00218.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 37

[Bug 931978] New: VUL-0: CVE-2014-9721: zeromq: protocol downgrade attack on sockets using the ZMTP v3 protocol
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Apr '22

07 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=931978 Bug ID: 931978 Summary: VUL-0: CVE-2014-9721: zeromq: protocol downgrade attack on sockets using the ZMTP v3 protocol Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: 13.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Security Assignee: tchvatal(a)suse.com Reporter: abergmann(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: Security Response Team Blocker: --- rh#1221666 ------------------------------------- It was discovered that zeromq, a lightweight messaging kernel, is susceptible to a protocol downgrade attack on sockets using the ZMTP v3 protocol. This could allow remote attackers to bypass ZMTP v3 security mechanisms by sending ZMTP v2 or earlier headers. CVE request: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/07/8 Upstream bug report: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/1273 Upstream fix: https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq4-x/commit/b6e3e0f601e2c1ec1f3aac880ed6a3fe… ------------------------------------- References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221666 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-9721 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q2/515 http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2014/CVE-2014-9721.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 12

[Bug 1105305] New: pencil doesn't run on Leap 15
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Apr '22

06 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1105305 Bug ID: 1105305 Summary: pencil doesn't run on Leap 15 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: aj(a)ajaissle.de Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- $ pencil Error: Platform version '60.1.0' is not compatible with minVersion >= 4.0 maxVersion <= 52.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 953735] New: Change libqt5-creator name to qt5-creator
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Apr '22

03 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=953735 Bug ID: 953735 Summary: Change libqt5-creator name to qt5-creator Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: 2015* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: ronisbr(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi! In Tumbleweed, I have been using the package qt-creator to develop Qt applications for a long time. I have always complained about the old version, since qt-creator is 3.2.2 and the newest version available is 3.5.1. However, it turns out that the newest version is already available in Tumbleweed (and in Leap) under the name libqt5-creator. Is there any good reason to name the package as libqt5-creator? I think this is very confusing. Since it has a lib* in the name, I did not even look at the description, so I was using a very old version all the time. Thus, I am wondering if it is possible to change the name of libqt5-creator to qt5-creator or something else. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1099804] New: Gnucash is unable to retrieve and open guide files in openSUSE LEAP 15.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Apr '22

01 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1099804 Bug ID: 1099804 Summary: Gnucash is unable to retrieve and open guide files in openSUSE LEAP 15.0 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME Assignee: bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: michele.di.pede(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- I am using openSUSE Leap 15.0 with KDE. Gnucash is not able to locate and open the guide file despite the gnucash-docs package is correctly installed. I tried to dig a bit deeper with this invocation: gnucash --debug --extra --log gnc.gui=debug This is the relevant part of the trace file: [...] * 10:00:08 DEBUG <gnc.gui> [enter ../gnucash/gnome-utils/gnc-file.c:gnc_post_file_open()] filename * 10:00:14 DEBUG <gnc.gui> [gnc_gnome_help] Attempting to opening help uri ghelp:gnucash-guide * 10:00:16 CRIT <gnc.gui> [gnc_gnome_help()] La posizione specificata non è supportata [...] Last trace is the italian translation for "The specified position is not supported". In my system the gnucash configuration file /.gnucash/config.auto is not present despite it is mentioned in gnucash man help file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1014929] New: GNOME:Apps/gnucash-docs: Bug
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Apr '22

01 Apr '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1014929 Bug ID: 1014929 Summary: GNOME:Apps/gnucash-docs: Bug Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE 42.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software Assignee: os.gnome.maintainers(a)gmail.com Reporter: adrian.klaver(a)gmail.com QA Contact: opensuse-communityscreening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Need to add a dependency for yelp to package. Covers the case where the package is being installed on system that is not using GNOME as its desktop, eg using KDE. Without yelp you get the following message when trying to open the GnuCash Help: "GnuCash could not find the files for the help documentation. " even though gnucash-docs is installed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3