March 2018 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1083392] "failed: Device or resource busy" when creating lvm snapshot of ext4 filesystem
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083392 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083392#c2 --- Comment #2 from zhen ren <zren(a)suse.com> --- > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. lvcreate --size 5G -s -n s1519859674 /dev/datavg/lv_kvmdata > > Actual Results: > device-mapper: remove ioctl on (254:13) failed: Device or resource busy > Logical volume "s1519859674" created. > Can you run "lvcreate -vvv ..." to get verbose output? and other commands: $lsblk $dmsetup ls --tree $dmsetup info -c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1084063] release package is outdated
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1084063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1084063#c2 Ludwig Nussel <lnussel(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel(a)suse.com> --- suggests removed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1083392] "failed: Device or resource busy" when creating lvm snapshot of ext4 filesystem
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083392 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083392#c1 --- Comment #1 from zhen ren <zren(a)suse.com> --- > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. lvcreate --size 5G -s -n s1519859674 /dev/datavg/lv_kvmdata > > Actual Results: > device-mapper: remove ioctl on (254:13) failed: Device or resource busy > Logical volume "s1519859674" created. > I take a very quick test on my 42.3, but don't see this issue: ws:~ # cat /etc/issue Welcome to openSUSE Leap 42.3 - Kernel \r (\l). ws:~ # rpm -qa|grep lvm2 lvm2-2.02.120-80.1.x86_64 ws:~ # vgcreate vg1 /dev/sda2 Volume group "vg1" successfully created ws:~ # lvcreate -L1G -n lv1 vg1 Logical volume "lv1" created. ws:~ # mkfs.ext4 /dev/vg1/lv1 mke2fs 1.42.11 (09-Jul-2014) ... ws:~ # mount /dev/vg1/lv1 /mnt/ ws:~ # lvcreate -L500M -s -n lv1-snap vg1/lv1 Logical volume "lv1-snap" created. ws:~ # lvs vg1 LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert lv1 vg1 owi-aos--- 1.00g lv1-snap vg1 swi-a-s--- 500.00m lv1 0.00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1084213] [storage-ng][*15 affected] /home subvolume not created if user opts to not have a /home partition
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084213 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084213#c2 --- Comment #2 from Richard Brown <rbrown(a)suse.com> --- Confirmed alternative way of reproducing bug - install any libstorage-ng OS on a disk too small for a seperate /home partition (eg. 8GB) - the automatic default proposal will not propose a /home subvolume, when it absolutely must in this case -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1083212] Please drop mkfontscale/mkfontdir usage from texlive font packages
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083212 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083212#c2 Dr. Werner Fink <werner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefan.bruens(a)rwth-aachen.d | |e Flags| |needinfo?(stefan.bruens@rwt | |h-aachen.de) Severity|Normal |Enhancement --- Comment #2 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Stefan Brüns from comment #0) > Currently, the various texlive font packages create fonts.dir/fonts.scale > using mkfontdir/mkfontscale. > > This is quite pointless: > > - the font packages go into /usr/share/fonts/texlive-<package>/, but this is > outside the X server font path, which is (see /var/log/Xorg.0.log) > [191632.294] (==) FontPath set to: > /usr/share/fonts/misc:unscaled, > /usr/share/fonts/Type1/, > /usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled, > /usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled, > /usr/share/fonts/ghostscript/, > /usr/share/fonts/cyrillic:unscaled, > /usr/share/fonts/truetype/, > i.e. to use any of this fonts, the user had to additionally use xset +fp ... > for each package > > - this is for the vast majority of programs unnecessary, as it is only > needed for server side font rendering, current programs use client side > rendering. I'll not drop this, see /etc/fonts/conf.avail/ and the texlive enable and disable files below ... but this is an addon for the user him/her self as by default this might cause trouble (In reply to Stefan Brüns from comment #1) > Probably best achieved by: > > - using %reconfigure_fonts_prereq as BuildRequires > > - adding %link_avail_to_system_fontsconf <number>-<name).conf to the > %install section > > - using the following macro to create the %post... stanzas > %reconfigure_fonts_scriptlets > > see e.g. > https://rudin.suse.de:8894/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/cantarell- > fonts/cantarell-fonts.spec?expand=1 I'm aware but who decides which font should go into and which should not? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1083828] New: tcl/tk wish crashes
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083828 Bug ID: 1083828 Summary: tcl/tk wish crashes Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: reinhard.hennig(a)freenet.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 762585 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=762585&action=edit A Screenshot of thhe snippet being startet from the commandline wish crashes with sigsegv (11) when including Iwidgets (iwidgets::extfileselectionbox) actual version of tcl and tk (8.6.7) lead to the error: using older versions 8.6.1 it works fine: Here is sample code: #!/bin/bash # restart using wish \ exec wish "$0" -- "$@" # initializing set DOCDIR $env(HOME) proc ChooseWin { dir } { toplevel .choosewin iwidgets::extfileselectionbox .choosewin.fsb -width 8i -height 6i \ -dirslabel "Directories" \ -fileslabel "Files" \ -selectionlabel "Please select" \ -directory $dir \ -selectforeground white \ -selectbackground red \ -highlightthickness 2 \ -selectfilecommand { .choosewin.fsb configure -selectionlabel "your choice" } pack .choosewin.fsb -fill both -expand yes } # ------------------------------------- Main ----------------------------------- package require Iwidgets . configure -bg grey button .button -text "push me 4 search" \ -fg black -bg grey80 \ -command { if { ![winfo exists .choosewin ] } { ChooseWin $DOCDIR } } pack .button ##end pushing the button normally opens a fileselectiondialog in a new window. Using actual versions of tk and tcl on OpenSuSE 42.2 and OpenSuSE 42.3 are causing crashes (wish collapses at signal 11). I've also done strace -fp on the wish procid showing SigSegV. I think it's a bug that should be reported. It happens on OpenSuSE 42.2 and OpenSuSE 42.3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1082898] Broken dependency of fwupdate
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082898 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082898#c1 --- Comment #1 from Gary Ching-Pang Lin <glin(a)suse.com> --- The change was merged automatically from SLE15. Since Leap15 entered Beta phase, it's probably time to request a new shim signature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1082898] Broken dependency of fwupdate
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082898 Weihua Du <whdu(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |whdu(a)suse.com Assignee|bnc-team-screening(a)forge.pr |glin(a)suse.com |ovo.novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1055533] New: [regression] installation of locally built packages requires disabling verification
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055533 Bug ID: 1055533 Summary: [regression] installation of locally built packages requires disabling verification Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: libzypp Assignee: zypp-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: thardeck(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- To run integration tests we build an rpm package locally with osc and install this by calling `zypper --non-interactive in <local_package_path>`. This process does not work anymore in the latest Tumbleweed snapshots because zypper requires an existing signature unless the parameter `--no-gpg-checks` is provided. But using `--no-gpg-checks` would be a security risk because all the dependencies are then also not verified and often downloaded via http. Before the change they were verified so tampering was not possible. To prevent those security risks it would be great if locally available packages can still be installed non-interactively without disabling the gpg checks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1082900] lsof 4.90 gives bogus information
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Mar '18

07 Mar '18

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082900 Weihua Du <whdu(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |whdu(a)suse.com Assignee|bnc-team-screening(a)forge.pr |kstreitova(a)suse.com |ovo.novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0