June 2017 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1039737] Kernel BUG at ../mm/huge_memory.c / split_huge_page
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039737 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039737#c26 --- Comment #26 from Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jochen Hansper from comment #25) > (In reply to Vlastimil Babka from comment #24) > > You could try building your own kernel, but without my patches, and run > > without "nogbpages", which can rule out the "self-compilation obscures the > > bug" case. > > I'll do that. I'll build kernel-4.4.70-18.9-default or should I stick to > kernel-4.4.62-18.6-default? Let's do the latest. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1043502] Error "NameError: global name 'getopt' is not defined" in Mercurial after applying Leap 42.2 Update-Test patch 6851 ("Security update for mercurial", brings Mercurial version from 3.8.3-1.5 to 3.8.3-2.3.1)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043502 Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|obs:running:6851:important |obs:running:6851:important | |ibs:running:4934:important -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1039737] Kernel BUG at ../mm/huge_memory.c / split_huge_page
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039737 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039737#c25 --- Comment #25 from Jochen Hansper <hansper(a)t-online.de> --- (In reply to Vlastimil Babka from comment #24) > You could try building your own kernel, but without my patches, and run > without "nogbpages", which can rule out the "self-compilation obscures the > bug" case. I'll do that. I'll build kernel-4.4.70-18.9-default or should I stick to kernel-4.4.62-18.6-default? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1020077] New: fstrim.service should not run fstrim -a
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020077 Bug ID: 1020077 Summary: fstrim.service should not run fstrim -a Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: asn(a)cryptomilk.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The fstrim.service of the util-linux-systemd package should not run 'fstrim -a'. If you install openSUSE Tumbleweed is chooses btrfs for the root filesystem and creates subvolumes. For example: /dev/sda3 on /tmp type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=264,subvol=/@/tmp) /dev/sda3 on /var/lib/mysql type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=272,subvol=/@/var/lib/mysql) /dev/sda3 on /var/lib/pgsql type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=274,subvol=/@/var/lib/pgsql) /dev/sda3 on /var/lib/machines type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=269,subvol=/@/var/lib/machines) /dev/sda3 on /opt type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=262,subvol=/@/opt) /dev/sda3 on /usr/local type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=265,subvol=/@/usr/local) /dev/sda3 on /var/lib/named type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=273,subvol=/@/var/lib/named) /dev/sda3 on /var/log type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=275,subvol=/@/var/log) /dev/sda3 on /var/tmp type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=278,subvol=/@/var/tmp) /dev/sda3 on /var/cache type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=266,subvol=/@/var/cache) /dev/sda3 on /srv type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=263,subvol=/@/srv) /dev/sda3 on /var/lib/mailman type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=270,subvol=/@/var/lib/mailman) /dev/sda3 on /.snapshots type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=258,subvol=/(a)/.snapshots) /dev/sda3 on /var/crash type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=267,subvol=/@/var/crash) /dev/sda3 on /var/lib/mariadb type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=271,subvol=/@/var/lib/mariadb) /dev/sda3 on /boot/grub2/x86_64-efi type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=261,subvol=/@/boot/grub2/x86_64-efi) /dev/sda3 on /var/spool type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=277,subvol=/@/var/spool) /dev/sda3 on /var/lib/libvirt/images type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=268,subvol=/@/var/lib/libvirt/images) >From the fstrim manpage: "fstrim is used on a mounted filesystem" So 'fstrim -a' trims each subvolume of /dev/sda3. This means it trims /dev/sda3 in the exmaple more than 15 times! Please implement a more intelligent solution for trimming. A script which works on the output of 'lsblk -o MOUNTPOINT,FSTYPE' output would be more intelligent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 1042037] Apache upgrade runs /usr/share/apache2/apache-22-24-upgrade and issues a2enmod: command not found
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042037 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042037#c8 --- Comment #8 from Dario Savella <dario(a)growingman.com> --- I think I misinterpreted those lines: > if ! a2enmod -q log_config; then > a2enmod log_config > fi I see now that if the module is not already enabled, the script won't touch it. Sorry...<sheepish look> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1043602] systemd fstrim timer defaults is insanely long
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043602 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043602#c7 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Pecka <nettezzaumanaa(a)gmail.com> --- @stanislav .. okay, I generally disagree with Theodore but thanks for the point to that discussion .... Ofc I have to mention that I also consider discard mount option as disaster, but viewed from my personal experience is fstrim to be done on daily basis rather harmless perhaps except on some systems that are using in some very limited ways theirs block devices ... regards, daniel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1039737] Kernel BUG at ../mm/huge_memory.c / split_huge_page
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039737 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039737#c24 --- Comment #24 from Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jochen Hansper from comment #23) > > Sigh, hopefully not a case where added debugging obscures the bug. > > If you want to try something else, I'll try to test it. Thanks a lot for > looking into this. You could try building your own kernel, but without my patches, and run without "nogbpages", which can rule out the "self-compilation obscures the bug" case. > If I understand correctly, then setting nogbpages might work around the bug > on an unpatched kernel, too? I highly doubt that, but let's go step by step. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1039737] Kernel BUG at ../mm/huge_memory.c / split_huge_page
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039737 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039737#c23 --- Comment #23 from Jochen Hansper <hansper(a)t-online.de> --- (In reply to Vlastimil Babka from comment #22) > > Unfortunately, I will have to reboot over the weekend. > > Probably shouldn't matter. Thanks for testing. Rebooted after 160h uptime, without errors. Still running the patched kernel. > Sigh, hopefully not a case where added debugging obscures the bug. If you want to try something else, I'll try to test it. Thanks a lot for looking into this. If I understand correctly, then setting nogbpages might work around the bug on an unpatched kernel, too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 997757] fstrim takes almost an hour, starves other IO-bound processes
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997757 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997757#c8 Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(sbrabec(a)suse.com) --- Comment #8 from Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.com> --- Jeff, my original question has been whether there is some easy way for userspace (util-linux in this case) to tell that all those different entries in /proc/mounts for btrfs are actually the same filesystem. That way fstrim can avoid calling FITRIM several times for the same filesystem. Since I last asked in September, I have actually learned the util-linux already has some support for demangling btrfs subvolume mess used e.g. by lsblk command so maybe fstrim could use it as well and thus avoid calling FITRIM repeatedly for all subvolumes? Standa? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1037891] All YaST module window names show "ruby" instead of a more specifc name (was: Yast module windows in Plasma: generic x window icon and grouped as "ruby" in task manager)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037891 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037891#c38 --- Comment #38 from Lukas Ocilka <locilka(a)suse.com> --- And while the use case of "showing no label" might be valid, it fails for other use case which is: "showing something that is used by X server while switching from one window to another or just for `running apps` menu" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0