May 2017 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1037135] New: update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for libblas.so.3 and liblapack.so.3 and [: =: unary operator expected during libopenblas_pthreads0-0.2.19-1.15.x86_64
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037135 Bug ID: 1037135 Summary: update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for libblas.so.3 and liblapack.so.3 and [: =: unary operator expected during libopenblas_pthreads0-0.2.19-1.15.x86_64 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: pgeorgiadis(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The following 10 noarch packages: > blender-lang-2.78c-3.2.noarch > blender-lang-2.78c-3.2.noarch > pitivi-lang-0.98-2.2.noarch > pitivi-lang-0.98-2.2.noarch > python3-holoviews-1.6.2-1.2.noarch > python3-holoviews-1.6.2-1.2.noarch > python3-jupyter_ipython-iptest-5.3.0-1.1.noarch > python3-jupyter_ipython-iptest-5.3.0-1.1.noarch > python3-opengl-3.1.0-5.2.noarch > python3-opengl-3.1.0-5.2.noarch > python3-patsy-0.4.1-1.2.noarch > python3-patsy-0.4.1-1.2.noarch > python3-pygame-doc-1.9.2+hg3425-2.1.noarch > python3-pygame-doc-1.9.2+hg3425-2.1.noarch > python3-seaborn-0.7.1-2.1.noarch > python3-seaborn-0.7.1-2.1.noarch > ski-6.11-1.3.noarch > ski-6.11-1.3.noarch > spyder3-hdf5-3.0.0-1.2.noarch > spyder3-hdf5-3.0.0-1.2.noarch they have a dependency on 'libopenblas_pthreads0-0.2.19-1.15.x86_64' package. Upon the installation of this package, the following error happens: > Transaction ID 59012ce4 started > Installing: libopenblas_pthreads0-0.2.19-1.15.x86_64 [............done] > Additional rpm output: > update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for libblas.so.3 > update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for liblapack.so.3 > update-alternatives: using /usr/lib64/libopenblas_pthreads.so.0 to provide /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3 (libblas.so.3) in auto mode > update-alternatives: using /usr/lib64/libopenblas_pthreads.so.0 to provide /usr/lib64/libcblas.so.3 (libcblas.so.3) in auto mode > update-alternatives: using /usr/lib64/libopenblas_pthreads.so.0 to provide /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3 (liblapack.so.3) in auto mode > update-alternatives: using /usr/lib64/libopenblas_pthreads.so.0 to provide /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 (libopenblas.so.0) in auto mode > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0TgvVF: line 17: [: =: unary operator expected > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0TgvVF: line 20: [: =: unary operator expected As you can see, `update-alternatives` throws the following *error*: > update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for libblas.so.3 > update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for liblapack.so.3 Note: If you think that is not an error, please change the message to not use the word 'error' but something else (e.g. warning). Furthermore: > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0TgvVF: line 17: [: =: unary operator expected > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0TgvVF: line 20: [: =: unary operator expected As a result the transaction is not finished normally. This means that when `zypper` is initiating an installation process you see the message `Transaction ID 59012ce8 started`. When `zypper` has been finished, you see the message `Transaction ID 59012ce8 finished: 0` -- which is not the case for this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1037003] Text in slide show during install incorrect
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037003 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037003#c3 Douglas DeMaio <ddemaio(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Douglas DeMaio <ddemaio(a)suse.com> --- Made changes and submitted a pull request on https://github.com/openSUSE/yast-slide-show -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1037003] Text in slide show during install incorrect
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037003 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037003#c2 Karl Eichwalder <ke(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ddemaio(a)suse.com, | |ke(a)suse.com Assignee|ke(a)suse.com |rbrown(a)suse.com --- Comment #2 from Karl Eichwalder <ke(a)suse.com> --- Richard or Doug, can you please sort this out and improve the text as needed? The slide-show text is on github. Feel free to reassign. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1036799] Please add "advisor" to hunspell's and LibreOffice's US dictionaries
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036799 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036799#c4 Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED URL| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 | |7559 Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM --- Comment #4 from Tomáš Chvátal <tchvatal(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Leon Meier from comment #3) > Ok, see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107559 > How about hunspell's dictionary? That is actually the same package. If it gets fixed in the libreoffice we will inherit it and it is then used system wide. Thus even the hunspell -d en_US would validate it. Marking as upstream pending their resolution (we update the dictionaries periodically about once half a year from that git repository). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1036298] /usr/bin/aratapif: cannot verify root:root 0755 - not listed in /etc/permissions
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036298 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036298#c2 Andreas Schwab <schwab(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab <schwab(a)suse.com> --- This is deliberate. It isn't needed unless you want to set up networking as unprivileged user. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 929471] New: hostname is not initialized so postfix default hostname/domainname faile
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929471 Bug ID: 929471 Summary: hostname is not initialized so postfix default hostname/domainname faile Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: 13.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dgolden(a)golden-consulting.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 633096 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=633096&action=edit console output 1) When the system is booted, the hostname is never initialized. 2) Postfix uses the gethostname() system call to establish the "myhostname" and "mydomain" variables; therefore setting the domain name wrong. This causes all the postfix configuration files to fail on systems upgraded to 13.2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 39

[Bug 1032562] GPT partition labels are all the same -> parted: can't set empty GPT part names
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032562 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032562#c7 Sebastian Parschauer <sebastian.parschauer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS Summary|partitioning labels are all |GPT partition labels are |the same |all the same -> parted: | |can't set empty GPT part | |names --- Comment #7 from Sebastian Parschauer <sebastian.parschauer(a)suse.com> --- Yep, I'm on it and we've discussed this upstream. Parted needs to be fixed first to change quote parsing to allow empty names for GPT partitions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1037003] Text in slide show during install incorrect
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037003 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037003#c1 Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de |ke(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer(a)suse.com> --- yast2-slide-show -> doc team / Karl Eichwalder <ke(a)suse.com> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1036799] Please add "advisor" to hunspell's and LibreOffice's US dictionaries
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036799 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036799#c3 --- Comment #3 from Leon Meier <Leon.Meier(a)yandex.ru> --- Ok, see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107559 How about hunspell's dictionary? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1032755] btrfs receive exits trying to create a link
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 May '17

02 May '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032755 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032755#c3 --- Comment #3 from Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Jon Nelson from comment #2) > (In reply to Filipe Manana from comment #1) > > Can you please do the following? > > > > 1) Report the kernel version. The btrfsprogs version is irrelevant, as all > > it does is run the commands from the send stream (made by the kernel) > > sequentially. > > 4.4.49 and 4.4.57 and older versions, too. > > > > 2) Provide the full output of the "btrfs receive -vvv ..." command. > > > receiving snapshot snapshot uuid=074ed140-b5de-2b45-b411-c1b47e9328b4, > ctransid=328695 parent_uuid=c2cc815d-dffa-2441-b363-ad8ffb1a3ecc, > parent_ctransid=326104 > utimes root > utimes usr > utimes bin/cat > utimes bin/cp > utimes bin/gzip > ... Well, this really isn't the full output, is it? Judging those "..."... > utimes etc/sysconfig/SuSEfirewall2.d/services/nfs-kernel-server > utimes usr/share/man/man8/rpc.mountd.8.gz > utimes usr/share/man/man8/rpc.nfsd.8.gz > utimes var/lib/samba/private/msg.sock/1808 > utimes var/lib/samba/private/msg.sock/1891 > link root/.ssh/agent-turnip-pid19907 -> root/.ssh/agent-turnip > link root/.ssh/agent-turnip-pid20340 -> root/.ssh/agent-turnip > ERROR: link root/.ssh/agent-turnip-pid20340 -> root/.ssh/agent-turnip > failed: File exists > At snapshot snapshot > > > > > > > 3) Ideally, provide an image of the filesystem (with btrfs-image) or the > > output of btrfs-debug-tree. These would be very convenient but may not be > > strictly necessary to debug and understand the problem. > > That is one I'd really have to think about. Take your time thinking about it. btrfs-image replaces the data with zeroes, so all that you'll reveal is metadata (file names essentially). thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0