February 2017 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1024156] New: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024156 Bug ID: 1024156 Summary: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: jeffm(a)suse.com Reporter: jeffm(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1024155] New: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024155 Bug ID: 1024155 Summary: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: jeffm(a)suse.com Reporter: jeffm(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1023634] New: dracut cannot find systemd-bootchart
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1023634 Bug ID: 1023634 Summary: dracut cannot find systemd-bootchart Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: Tyler_Kdog(a)Yahoo.com QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- In the process of building the initrd, dracut is now reporting: dracut: dracut module 'systemd-bootchart' will not be installed, because command '/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-bootchart' could not be found! The reason for this seems to simply be that bootchart is, as of commit c5c3445825981e2a5c3ed71214127d5b1b9de802 [1], no longer a part of systemd. [1] See https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/Base:System/systemd/systemd.ch… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1024140] New: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024140 Bug ID: 1024140 Summary: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: jeffm(a)suse.com Reporter: jeffm(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu(a)oracle.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:59:58 +0800 Subject: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use Git-commit: ddba1bfc2369cd0566bcfdab47599834a32d1c19 Patch-mainline: v4.2-rc2 References: revisit While running generic/019, dmesg got several warnings from btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(). Test generic/019 produces some disk failures so sumbit dio will get errors, in which case, btrfs_direct_IO() goes to the error handling and free bytes_may_use, but the problem is that bytes_may_use has been free'd during get_block(). This adds a runtime flag to show if we've gone through get_block(), if so, don't do the cleanup work. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu(a)oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm(a)fb.com> Acked-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm(a)suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 2 ++ fs/btrfs/inode.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1024136] New: no sound, kernel cannot load snd-soc-skl for Sunrise Point-LP HD Audio
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1024136 Bug ID: 1024136 Summary: no sound, kernel cannot load snd-soc-skl for Sunrise Point-LP HD Audio Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Sound Assignee: tiwai(a)suse.com Reporter: tronath(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 713252 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=713252&action=edit screenshot of YaST2 auto config sound screen A fresh install of Tumbleweed Snapshot20170205. I no files are in /proc/asound and alsaconf can't find a PnP or PCI sound card. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1023552] update-ca-certificates deletes installed certs
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023552 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023552#c3 --- Comment #3 from Jo Schulze <jo(a)feuersee.de> --- I accept this WONTFIX as I always do, but here are my thoughts about how to improve the situation. Well, we're no longer in the 90s where hardly anything than https required certs. Nowadays hardly anything (like po3s, imaps, https, ...) is supposed to support (at least alternativly) encryption, and even if self-signed by own CA certs are used - or paid for certs - there is a need for a central, non-app based place to store these certs. As these certs usually pin down to the CN which is most likely the FQHN it is much more convenient concerning maintainance to store them in a central place than placing copys all over the FS for the appropriate services. In Debian based dists this is /etc/ssl and works pretty well. I don't see the any benefit in the openSUSE construct to symlink this dir to /var/whatever and deny any admin changes. This leaves the admin to spread the same cert all over again to the various places where the service expects it's certs to find, while most services are currently easy to accept a server-wide place to read certs from. I'd say that the service based assumption of where to place certs is outdated and won't work much longer. openSUSE should decide where system-wide used certs are to be placed, not service-wide. Just my 2¢ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1024126] New: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024126 Bug ID: 1024126 Summary: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: jeffm(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu(a)oracle.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:59:58 +0800 Subject: Btrfs: fix warning of bytes_may_use Git-commit: ddba1bfc2369cd0566bcfdab47599834a32d1c19 Patch-mainline: v4.2-rc2 References: revisit While running generic/019, dmesg got several warnings from btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(). Test generic/019 produces some disk failures so sumbit dio will get errors, in which case, btrfs_direct_IO() goes to the error handling and free bytes_may_use, but the problem is that bytes_may_use has been free'd during get_block(). This adds a runtime flag to show if we've gone through get_block(), if so, don't do the cleanup work. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu(a)oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm(a)fb.com> Acked-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm(a)suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 2 ++ fs/btrfs/inode.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1023608] autoinstallation cloning system produces error
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023608 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023608#c2 --- Comment #2 from Hermann Baar <h.baar(a)tsn.at> --- Created attachment 713245 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=713245&action=edit yast2 log files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1024122] New: btrfs: provide super_operations->inode_get_dev
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024122 Bug ID: 1024122 Summary: btrfs: provide super_operations->inode_get_dev Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: jeffm(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm(a)suse.com> Subject: btrfs: provide super_operations->inode_get_dev References: bsc#927455 Patch-mainline: No, upstream wants a super_block per anon dev In order to ensure that the per-subvolume anonymous dev_t gets published to userspace, we need to provide the super_operations->get_inode_dev operation. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm(a)suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 2 +- fs/btrfs/super.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1024121] New: btrfs: provide super_operations->inode_get_dev fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 2 +-
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024121 Bug ID: 1024121 Summary: btrfs: provide super_operations->inode_get_dev fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 2 +- Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: jeffm(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- This is comment #0 of an example bug created by the python-bugzilla.git examples/create.py script. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1