June 2015 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 911562] wicked does not set up IP on interfaces without carrier
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911562 --- Comment #28 from Pawel Wieczorkiewicz <pwieczorkiewicz(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Tom Burkart from comment #27) > (In reply to Pawel Wieczorkiewicz from comment #26) > > But before please ensure you have tried information provided in comment#4 > > and comment#12 of this bug with wicked 0.6.18. > > Turning on nanny does "fix" the problem. > But why is this required for a "static IP" setup? The reality is that in > this case nanny needs to be enabled by default on systems where there is any > possibility of loss of link during boot. This covers >80% of systems. To > me that is a serious flaw. Have you used LINK_READY_WAIT variable with your ifcfg config? Have you set this variable to the value smaller than value of WAIT_FOR_INTERFACES from /etc/sysconfig/network/config file? If you haven't, the standalone wicked client call will timeout after $WAIT_FOR_INTERFACES seconds waiting for the link to come up. Thus nanny needs to be used, which is a client daemon dealing with hotplug scenarios like yours. See this excerpt from ifcfg(5): LINK_READY_WAIT This variable configures how long to wait for the link detection (by the kernel / network card driver) in seconds. Default is 0, causing to not wait at all if link is not required or wait infinitely when link is required, so nanny can continue with the setup when the cable gets connected to the network card after a while. Otherwise wicked will wait until the specified number of seconds and continue with further steps if link is not required or fail and stop further steps if nanny is not used (see use-nanny in wicked-config(5)). Note, that an ifup call has it's own, independent timeout, which is limiting the maximal time ifup waits before it has to report (see global network/config WAIT_FOR_INTERFACES variable). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 896474] No upgrade offered at all using current factory iso wanting to upgrade present local system on sda?
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896474 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abittner(a)opensuse.org, | |chcao(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(abittner@opensuse | |.org) --- Comment #6 from Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> --- Hi Andreas, is this issue still existing please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 911562] wicked does not set up IP on interfaces without carrier
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911562 --- Comment #27 from Tom Burkart <suse(a)aussec.com> --- (In reply to Pawel Wieczorkiewicz from comment #26) > But before please ensure you have tried information provided in comment#4 > and comment#12 of this bug with wicked 0.6.18. Turning on nanny does "fix" the problem. But why is this required for a "static IP" setup? The reality is that in this case nanny needs to be enabled by default on systems where there is any possibility of loss of link during boot. This covers >80% of systems. To me that is a serious flaw. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 932630] [yast2-bootloader] Yast2 bug message 'examineMBR'
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=932630 --- Comment #5 from Misi Mókus <misi(a)ship.hu> --- Created attachment 636288 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=636288&action=edit rpm -qa logsave It is an ancient openSuSE system, more than 10 years old; yearly update. Boot: grub. The last system upgrade have several errors: videocard setup, plasma desktop starting, mozilla update and so on (in every year were more and more errors nowadays...). After some of upgrade efforts and the patches the system is usable but not without errors... and I am not a guru also... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 896083] apache module access_compat reports false error when using directive satisfy any/all
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896083 Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P4 - Low --- Comment #8 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- I have asked upstream in the bug if they are going to fix the problem. If they will not, then I wouldn't either. Feel free to push in their bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 891268] AUDIT-0: CVE-2014-7141: VUL-1: server:proxy/squid permissions and setbadness handling
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891268 Martin Pluskal <mpluskal(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpluskal(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 891268] AUDIT-0: CVE-2014-7141: VUL-1: server:proxy/squid permissions and setbadness handling
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891268 --- Comment #23 from Sebastian Krahmer <krahmer(a)suse.com> --- Since sle11sp3 should not have a mode 04750 pinger, and the issue is low severity its not necessary to patch it. However, the DoS patch could be included in the next regular squid update for sle11sp3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 896083] apache module access_compat reports false error when using directive satisfy any/all
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896083 Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |CONFIRMED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 896083] apache module access_compat reports false error when using directive satisfy any/all
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896083 Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #7 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- Ugh, changing status had not been intentional. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 891268] AUDIT-0: CVE-2014-7141: VUL-1: server:proxy/squid permissions and setbadness handling
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891268 glen dsouza <gdsouza(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gdsouza(a)suse.com --- Comment #22 from glen dsouza <gdsouza(a)suse.com> --- Is this affecting sles11sp3? If yes - can we expect a patch for it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0