openSUSE Bugs March 2015

bugs@lists.opensuse.org

1 participants
3781 discussions

[Bug 690867] New: Consider to DNSSEC sign the opensuse.org domain
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 28 Mar '20

28 Mar '20

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690867 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690867#c0 Summary: Consider to DNSSEC sign the opensuse.org domain Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Infrastructure AssignedTo: mrueckert(a)novell.com ReportedBy: burnus(a)gmx.de QAContact: lrupp(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0 Currently, the opensuse.org domain is not secured using DNSSEC: http://dnsviz.net/d/opensuse.org/dnssec/ It would be useful, if it could be signed. Other domains are already signed such as: - Fedora: http://dnsviz.net/d/fedoraproject.org/dnssec/ - Mozilla: http://dnsviz.net/d/wiki.mozilla.org/dnssec/ (Side remark: In Firefox, the plugin http://www.dnssec-validator.cz/ can be used to see the DNSSEC status.) Reproducible: Always -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 735865] New: add BuildRequires: python-cups to printer driver packages
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 24 Mar '20

24 Mar '20

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735865 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735865#c0 Summary: add BuildRequires: python-cups to printer driver packages Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Printing AssignedTo: jsmeix(a)suse.com ReportedBy: lnussel(a)suse.com QAContact: jsmeix(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- all printer driver packages should have BuildRequires: python-cups python-cups installs special rpm macros that adds Provides tags for the printer drivers supported by the package. See gutenprint for an example how the resulting rpm looks like. See also bug 735864 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 915483] New: a2ps:/etc/a2ps.cfg:220: invalid option `variable:'
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Mar '20

10 Mar '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915483 Bug ID: 915483 Summary: a2ps:/etc/a2ps.cfg:220: invalid option `variable:' Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201501* Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: gp(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 621418 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=621418&action=edit Patch that fixes the configuration file Using a2ps on a simple text file, with a2ps-4.14-1.1.x86_64 I get % a2ps -o x.ps x a2ps:/etc/a2ps.cfg:220: invalid option `variable:' % ll /etc/a2ps.cfg -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15964 Dez 16 17:42 /etc/a2ps.cfg `rpm -V a2ps` indicates I have the vanilla version of that file, and indeed I never changed anything. This seems to be due to a spelling of "variable" (lowercase) vs "Variable", and can be fixed as follows (see attached patch): -variable: ghostview a2ps-open +Variable: ghostview a2ps-open -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 917728] New: Obsolete/deprecated config option still enabled
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 23 Feb '20

23 Feb '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=917728 Bug ID: 917728 Summary: Obsolete/deprecated config option still enabled Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 201502* Hardware: x86-64 OS: SUSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: zaitor(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi Kernel people. Just installed the spiffy new 3.19 kernel from Kernel:stable, and when going through journald logs to see if there was something new and exciting I came over these warnings that I've seen for ages, but never cared for since it seem to do no harm. linux-ial4:~ # uname -r 3.19.0-1.g8a7d5f9-desktop linux-ial4:~ # journalctl -b | grep CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER feb. 13 00:27:50 linux-ial4 kernel: ACPI: Deprecated procfs I/F for battery is loaded, please retry with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER cleared feb. 13 00:27:50 linux-ial4 kernel: ACPI: Deprecated procfs I/F for battery is loaded, please retry with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER cleared feb. 13 00:27:50 linux-ial4 kernel: ACPI: Deprecated procfs I/F for AC is loaded, please retry with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER cleared linux-ial4:~ # ---- But today I took the time to google it, and found this bug from Arch https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25845 Snip from bug ACPI: Deprecated procfs I/F for battery is loaded, please retry with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER cleared This was scheduled for removal in 2.6.39, but is still there. I suggest trying to disable it for 3.1, if for nothing else than to discover what problems this might cause so the appropriate bug reports can be filed. >From Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt: What: CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER When: 2.6.39 Why: sysfs I/F for ACPI power devices, including AC and Battery, has been working in upstream kernel since 2.6.24, Sep 2007. In 2.6.37, we make the sysfs I/F always built in and this option disabled by default. Remove this option and the ACPI power procfs interface in 2.6.39. Who: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang(a)intel.com> ---- Short story this was disabled on Arch back in 2011 Could we do this for openSUSE too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 790151] New: When I open nickle-2.70-1.src.rpm,YaST2 finds nothing to install.
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jan '20

02 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790151 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790151#c0 Summary: When I open nickle-2.70-1.src.rpm,YaST2 finds nothing to install. Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.2 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 URL: http://nickle.org/release/nickle-2.70-1.src.rpm OS/Version: openSUSE 12.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: giecrilj(a)stegny.2a.pl QAContact: jsrain(a)suse.com CC: hrvoje.senjan(a)gmail.com Depends on: 684610 Found By: Community User Blocker: No +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #684610 +++ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0 When I open nickle-2.70-1.src.rpm, YaST2 does not install anything. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Tell Dolphin to open nickle-2.70-1.src.rpm [1]. Actual Results: 1. YaST2 finds nothing to be installed. Expected Results: 1. Let YaST2 install the source package. ___ [1] <URL: http://nickle.org/release/nickle-2.70-1.src.rpm > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 712025] New: openssh helpers wrongly uses %_libdir
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Dec '19

26 Dec '19

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712025 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712025#c0 Summary: openssh helpers wrongly uses %_libdir Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Factory Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Network AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jengelh(a)medozas.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Beta-Customer Blocker: --- I had a openSUSE 11.4 i586 installation on one machine, and as I was upgrading its hardware to a 64-bit CPU, I did a x86_64 reinstall, and copied over the configs from the previous install. Among that was /etc/ssh/sshd_config. After this, sftp was no longer usable ("Connection closed by host"), hinting towards the helper not being executable. sshd_config, having been inherited from a i586 environment, contained: Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/ssh/sftp-server However, the sftp helper was installed in /usr/lib64/ssh (%_libdir/ssh), which I consider the wrong place, because the helper is bitness-independent and thus should go to %_libexecdir/ssh instead. The problem persists by looking at the current /network/openssh/openssh.spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 536564] New: Packages creating user accounts do not select UID
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Dec '19

26 Dec '19

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536564 Summary: Packages creating user accounts do not select UID Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jengelh(a)medozas.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Beta-Customer Some packages, such as openssh, do explicitly specify a UID/GID when creating its users/groups: /usr/sbin/groupadd -g 65 -o -r sshd 2>/dev/null || :; On the other hand, the hal package does not: /usr/sbin/groupadd -r haldaemon 2>/dev/null || : So, which is correct? Should not hal also use a fixed ID? There are many packages belonging to the latter category. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 518238] New: openSSH chroot security settings faulty
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Dec '19

26 Dec '19

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Summary: openSSH chroot security settings faulty Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: x86 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Network AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: marcus(a)swedcore.net QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060200 SUSE/3.0.11-0.1.1 Firefox/3.0.11 Whenever i tried to setup a chroot environment with OpenSSH the security settings for the user folder must be root or OpenSSH doesn't work, the only solution for now is to either create subfolders in the users chroot folder where the user can have write permissions or land them one step up in the hierarchy and thus making them see other chroot folder which is not good. I followed this Wiki page to the letter: http://en.opensuse.org/Openssh#SFTP_chroot_with_ChrootDirectory I have Swedish community users trying to set this up to with same result as me. This thread takes up the same issue: http://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=122640731518850&w=2 But the solution mentioned there is not acceptable because as it stats on the Wiki you make one folder the chroot folder and then mapping the users home folder relative to the chroot folder, in this scenario the users should get write permissions to his own folder, but that is not possible, thus breaking the functionality intended. So the question is, is this a bug or is it designed to act like this? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Done accordingly to this wiki entry: http://en.opensuse.org/OpenSSH Actual Results: Gets a read only home folder root Expected Results: Getting a writable home folder, where they can create on folder and upload files directly to the root of their home folder. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 788344] New: Improving go-doc package wanted
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Dec '19

26 Dec '19

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788344 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788344#c0 Summary: Improving go-doc package wanted Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.2 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: ke(a)suse.com QAContact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: graham(a)andtech.eu, speilicke(a)suse.com Found By: Development Blocker: --- The go-doc package is rather bewildered. Many links do not work. Many files are included that do not make sense in a doc package (e.g., Makefile or the emacs mode (go-mode.el) that comes with a different package). Les is more. Please ship only those parts that are nicely interlinked via HTML cross-references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 735320] New: go: %{go_make_install} breaks Make.cmd builds
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 26 Dec '19

26 Dec '19

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735320 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735320#c0 Summary: go: %{go_make_install} breaks Make.cmd builds Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: dmacvicar(a)suse.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: graham(a)andtech.eu, speilicke(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- If you build a go binary (not a package) you include Make.cmd instead of Make.pkg. Make.pkg installs in TARGDIR, which is set by the macro: %{go_make_install} to TARGDIR=%{buildroot}%{go_sitearch} This is right, as Make.pkg sets it as default to $(GOROOT)/pkg/$(GOOS)_$(GOARCH) But if you build a command, Make.cmd uses $GOBIN (/usr/bin), but it gets overriden by %{go_make_install} resulting in the binary to be installed in the package directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
379
Older →

Jump to page:

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Bugs March 2015