March 2015 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 856501] New: mc dataloss: moving a file and skipping upon problem deletes original file
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856501 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856501#c0 Summary: mc dataloss: moving a file and skipping upon problem deletes original file Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 13.1 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: richlv(a)nakts.net QAContact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux x86_64) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.15 in midnight commander, move a file to some location that causes a problem (for example, unable to chown it on the other side over ssh/shell link). when mc complains, choose 'skip'. target file is not closed, but original file is still deleted. Reproducible: Always -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 920354] New: Thunderbird displays old style notifications
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=920354 Bug ID: 920354 Summary: Thunderbird displays old style notifications Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: 13.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Firefox Assignee: bnc-team-mozilla(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: kinfoo.dev(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 625163 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=625163&action=edit Bottom right thunderbird notifacation Hi, Thunderbird display old style notification as attached. I have libnotify installed: $ zypper se libnotify Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Summary | Type --+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+----------- | gyachi-plugin-libnotify-debuginfo | Debug information for package gyachi-plugi-> | package | gyachi-plugin-libnotify | Libnotify plugin | package | gmpc-libnotify-debuginfo | Debug information for package gmpc-libnotify | package | gmpc-libnotify-debugsource | Debug sources for package gmpc-libnotify | package | gmpc-libnotify | Gmpc Libnotify Plugin | package | gmpc-libnotify | Gmpc Libnotify Plugin | srcpackage | libnotify-devel | Notifications Library | package i | libnotify-tools | Notifications Library -- Tools | package i | libnotify4 | Notifications Library | package | libnotify-devel-32bit | Notifications Library | package | libnotify4-32bit | Notifications Library | package | libnotify Thunderbird version is 31.4.0 Am I doing it wrong or is it a bug or a lack of configuration? Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 919468] qt5 lupdate (lupdate-qt5) fails with: cannot find feature spec_pre.prf
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919468 --- Comment #3 from Raymond Wooninck <tittiatcoke(a)gmail.com> --- Hi Hrvoje, Please have a look at this one. It might be a path issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 919468] qt5 lupdate (lupdate-qt5) fails with: cannot find feature spec_pre.prf
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919468 Raymond Wooninck <tittiatcoke(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|tittiatcoke(a)gmail.com |hrvoje.senjan(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 920205] New: mdcheck does not report errors in RAID5 array
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=920205 Bug ID: 920205 Summary: mdcheck does not report errors in RAID5 array Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: 13.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 13.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: pvh(a)oma.be QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 Build Identifier: The mdcheck script runs a check on all RAID (in my case RAID5) arrays once a month. This check is limited in time (6 hours in the default setup). Some of my RAID5 arrays are large enough that the check doesn't finish in 6 hours, so the check is stopped and resumed the next day. When the check is resumed, the count of mismatches it had found on the previous day is set to zero again. So if during day 1 sixteen mismatches were found and during day 2 zero mismatches were found, the final count will be zero. This creates the false impression that the RAID5 array is OK. I did not receive an email reporting the mismatches to me. I am not sure whether this is because the reporting is delayed until the full check is completed (in which case it is crucial to get the total sum of mismatches over all days right) or because the script doesn't report any mismatches it finds (which would not make any sense to me, such a feature would be important to have). Maybe this doesn't belong here, but since we are on the subject... I have not been able to find out how you can identify which physical disk in a RAID5 array is responsible for the mismatches. Is it possible to get that information? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: The mdcheck script is started automatically by cron. Actual Results: No mail was sent, the mismatch count was 0 after the final installment of the check even though the RAID5 array contained errors. Expected Results: I would expect at least to get an email reporting the mismatches in the RAID5 array. Ideally the mismatch count should also reflect the total number of mismatches on the array, not just the number from the last chunk of the check. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 918466] mkfontscale segfault on factory update
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918466 --- Comment #26 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- Will try to write a patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 905649] Blender: not compiled with Cycles render engine
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905649 --- Comment #8 from Stephan Barth <stephan.barth(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Dave Plater from comment #7) > I've submitted OpenImageIO version 1.5.12 to graphics and shall submit > blender with cycles when accepted. Meanwhile could you test the > home:plater:blender blender package, Ah, great. I installed the latest version from your repo yesterday and used it for about one hour with breaks and all worked fine :) Excellent job! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 918466] mkfontscale segfault on factory update
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918466 Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(wl(a)gnu.org) | --- Comment #25 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos(a)suse.com> --- Werner, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 918466] mkfontscale segfault on factory update
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918466 --- Comment #24 from Werner Lemberg <wl(a)gnu.org> --- As mentioned on the FreeType mailing list, there is no bug or regression on the FreeType side: The Hershey font in question doesn't have a `/FamilyName` entry in the `/FontInfo` dictionary, so the corresponding `family_name` field in `PS_FontInfoRec` is NULL. On the other hand, FreeType's Type 1 module synthesizes a proper `family_name` entry for the top-level `FT_FaceRec` structure. Solution 1: Rely on the synthesized entry from `FT_Face` in case `PS_FontInfo` holds a NULL pointer. Solution 2: Use `FT_Get_PS_Font_Value(..., PS_DICT_FONT_NAME, ...)` to manually extract the value of `/FontName` in case `/FamilyName` is empty. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 920204] YaST2 installer: increase master key size of LUKS volumes using XTS mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920204 Andreas Stieger <astieger(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(astieger(a)suse.com | |) | --- Comment #4 from Andreas Stieger <astieger(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 625153 --> http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=625153&action=edit logs Logs attached. I wonder if we should just change the defaults for cryptsetup at build time. > --with-luks1-cipher default cipher for LUKS1 [aes] > --with-luks1-mode default cipher mode for LUKS1 [xts-plain64] > --with-luks1-keybits default key length in bits for LUKS1 [256] > --with-luks1-iter-time default PBKDF2 iteration time for LUKS1 (in ms) > [1000] e.g.: %configure \ [...] --with-luks1-keybits=512 \ [...] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0