June 2013 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 805309] New: syslog-ng: NetworkManager entries in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/NetworkManager
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805309 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805309#c0 Summary: syslog-ng: NetworkManager entries in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/NetworkManager Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.3 Version: RC 1 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: koenig(a)linux.de QAContact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- 12.3-RC1 plus updates: in /var/log/NetworkManager the last entries are from Feb. 14, newer entries only show up in /var/log/messages: # tail -1 /var/log/NetworkManager Feb 14 10:02:55 hl NetworkManager[1168]: <info> wins '10.0.5.18' # xzgrep -h NetworkManager /var/log/messages{*xz,} | cut -d: -f2 | cut -d\ -f-2 | uniq -c 2671 Jan 21 869 Jan 22 1050 Jan 23 3485 Jan 24 8 Feb 2083 Feb 19 485 Feb 20 2800 Feb 21 441 Feb 22 # egrep -i 'network|netmgm' /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf # uncomment to process log messages from network: filter f_netmgm { message('^NetworkManager:'); }; # NetworkManager messages in one file: destination netmgm { file("/var/log/NetworkManager" suppress(30)); }; log { source(src); source(chroots); filter(f_netmgm); destination(netmgm); flags(final); }; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 696902] New: systemd as default boot handler (replacing sysvinit) for 12.1
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696902 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696902#c0 Summary: systemd as default boot handler (replacing sysvinit) for 12.1 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: fcrozat(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- This is a meta-bug to collect all bugs preventing systemd to be default boot handler for openSUSE 12.1. Please do not fill any issue here, bug open a new bug report and mark it as blocking this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 84

[Bug 826981] New: /boot partition is too small when you selected "Create LVM Based Proposal" in "Suggested Partitioning" on installer .
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826981 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826981#c0 Summary: /boot partition is too small when you selected "Create LVM Based Proposal" in "Suggested Partitioning" on installer . Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.3 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 12.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: bkbin005(a)rinku.zaq.ne.jp QAContact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.116 Safari/537.36 When I selected "Create LVM Based Proposal" in "Suggested Partitioning" on installer, Installer suggested "Create boot volume /dev/sda1 (156.88 MB)" . But it is too small for for updating the kernel . The present state is as follows. Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 154691 108188 38516 74% /boot rpm -qa 'kernel-desktop' kernel-desktop-3.7.10-1.16.1.x86_64 kernel-desktop-3.7.10-1.11.1.x86_64 Disk storage capacity runs short in update of the next kernel . In the past, disk storage capacity actually ran short by update of the kernel . The /boot partition is more than 256 M byte required. (ex: 1 G byte) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run Installer to "Suggested Partitioning" 2. Select "Create LVM Based Proposal" Actual Results: Installer suggested "Create boot volume /dev/sda1 (156.88 MB)" . Expected Results: Installer suggests 1 G byte for /boot. Please see also: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-ja/2013-06/msg00033.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 827418] New: Local cups server enters endless loop if remote server rejects print job
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827418 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827418#c0 Summary: Local cups server enters endless loop if remote server rejects print job Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.3 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Printing AssignedTo: jsmeix(a)suse.com ReportedBy: stefan.bruens(a)rwth-aachen.de QAContact: jsmeix(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.21 (KHTML, like Gecko) konqueror/4.10.4 Safari/537.21 In case the remote server answers with IPP_NOT_AUTHORIZED, the local server tries the job endlessly. Proper handling is implemented in CUPS STR#4190 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 780388] New: systemd-modules-load: libkmod: kmod_config_parse: /etc/modprobe.d/10-unsupported-modules.conf line 10: ignoring bad line starting with 'allow_unsupported_modules'
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=780388 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=780388#c0 Summary: systemd-modules-load: libkmod: kmod_config_parse: /etc/modprobe.d/10-unsupported-modules.conf line 10: ignoring bad line starting with 'allow_unsupported_modules' Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.2 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: per(a)opensuse.org QAContact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0 I was going through /var/log/messages and noticed the line in $SUBJ. Reproducible: Always -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 780266] New: openSUSE:12.2/systemd: Bug, un-supported line in 10-unsupported-modules.conf at boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=780266 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=780266#c0 Summary: openSUSE:12.2/systemd: Bug, un-supported line in 10-unsupported-modules.conf at boot Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 12.2 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software AssignedTo: fcrozat(a)suse.com ReportedBy: sault.don(a)gmail.com QAContact: opensuse-communityscreening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- During boot systemd outputs the following warning but the boot continues without issue and the desktop loads: Sep 14 08:17:48 d830 systemd-modules-load[273]: libkmod: kmod_config_parse: /etc/modprobe.d/10-unsupported-modules.conf line 10: ignoring bad line starting with 'allow_unsupported_modules' The value in that file says "allow_unsupported_modules 1" and that is not supported or something? Is it safe to remove this file that has the unsupported value or is there a new value to use instead of allow_unsupported_modules? Is this file is needed or was created to support the loading of the NVIDIA (proprietary) video module? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 826276] New: rkhunter.conf doesn't contain some files in /dev that should be whitelisted
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826276 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826276#c0 Summary: rkhunter.conf doesn't contain some files in /dev that should be whitelisted Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.3 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 12.3 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Security AssignedTo: security-team(a)suse.de ReportedBy: arun(a)gmx.de QAContact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/21.0 I'm running 12.3/Tumbleweed and rkhunter gives the following output: Warning: Suspicious file types found in /dev: /dev/.sysconfig/network/if-eth0: ASCII text /dev/.sysconfig/network/ifup-eth0: ASCII text /dev/.sysconfig/network/config-eth0: ASCII text /dev/.sysconfig/network/ifup-lo: ASCII text /dev/.sysconfig/network/if-lo: ASCII text /dev/.sysconfig/network/config-lo: ASCII text /dev/.sysconfig/network/started: ASCII text /dev/.sysconfig/network/new-stamp-2: ASCII text Warning: Hidden directory found: '/dev/.sysconfig' Warning: Hidden file found: /dev/.udev: symbolic link to `/run/udev' /etc/rkhunter.conf does include lines like: ALLOWDEVFILE=/dev/.sysconfig/sysconfig/ifup-eth0 so it looks to me that the above should also be included. As I mentioned I'm running Tumbleweed and haven't done a clean install in a while, so I'm not sure if this issue shows up in 12.3, but since the timestamps on these files are current, I assume that this would be the case. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run rkhunter 2. 3. Actual Results: warning about some files in /dev/.sysconfig Expected Results: shouldn't complain about files that are created by a standard system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 799173] New: filesystems/reiserfs: update version to 3.6.22 or 3.x.0j
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799173 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799173#c0 Summary: filesystems/reiserfs: update version to 3.6.22 or 3.x.0j Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software AssignedTo: jeffm(a)suse.com ReportedBy: doiggl(a)velocitynet.com.au QAContact: opensuse-communityscreening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hello Update version to 3.6.22 or 3.x.0j Sources: http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jeffm/reiserfsprogs/v3.6.22/ http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jeffm/reiserfsprogs/v3.x.0j/ Thanks Glenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 802505] New: filesystems/reiserfs: upgrade from reiserfsprogs-3.6.21 to reiserfsprogs-3.6.22
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802505 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802505#c0 Summary: filesystems/reiserfs: upgrade from reiserfsprogs-3.6.21 to reiserfsprogs-3.6.22 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software AssignedTo: jeffm(a)suse.com ReportedBy: doiggl(a)velocitynet.com.au QAContact: opensuse-communityscreening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hello, Upgrade reiserfs: upgrade from reiserfsprogs-3.6.21 to reiserfsprogs-3.6.22 Cheers Glenn Source: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/kernel/people/jeffm/reiserfsprogs/v3.6.22/reis… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 803384] New: pastes to paste.opensuse.org never expire
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803384 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803384#c0 Summary: pastes to paste.opensuse.org never expire Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.3 Version: RC 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Workspace AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: ctrippe(a)opensuse.org QAContact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) konqueror/4.10.0 Safari/534.34 Initially reported via http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2013-02/msg00246.html Hi, All & KDE maintainers, In Pastebin plasmoid, we have two unique service providers for paste.opensuse.org http://opendesktop.org/content/show.php?content=141038 and paste.opensuse.org (I failed to find its source) But we have a bug that pastes sending from those two service proviers are set to `never expires`. Because if you use the web GUI, it is set to "1 week". After some digging, I find it's even not what the author intended to do. Because in imgsusepasteorg/contents/code/main.js, he set the `expiry` to `1440` which means `1 Day`. Then I downloaded the stikked-0.5.4.zip (https://stikked.googlecode.com/files/stikked-0.5.4.zip) in system/application/views/defaults/paste_from.php, the id is actually `expire` instead of `expiry`. He failed to transfer the value for expiry, so pastes sent from there were set to `never expires`. So we need to change those two files in kdebase4-workspace package: /usr/share/kde4/apps/plasma/shareprovider/pasteopensuseorg/contents/code/main.js /usr/share/kde4/apps/plasma/shareprovider/imgsusepasteorg/contents/code/main.js and set `expiry` to `expire`. I didn't see our "suse tweak" for those two files in spec file, it seems to be from upstream, so we need a developer who has commit permission to fix it upstream. PS: We also have this problem for 12.2/12.1, so if we want to save our server, we have to make an update for them. PS1: I left a message for that uploader on opendesktop.org, if he's among us, please re-upload the fixed tar ball. Reproducible: Always -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4