August 2012 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 773845] Confirm license for hicolor-icon-theme-branding-openSUSE 12.2
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773845 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773845#c4 --- Comment #4 from Vincent Untz <vuntz(a)suse.com> 2012-08-01 08:38:57 UTC --- I think the COPYING file in the package comes from the repository where the icons got fetched. What's the actual license of those icons (ie, our logo)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 773845] Confirm license for hicolor-icon-theme-branding-openSUSE 12.2
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773845 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773845#c3 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |dimstar(a)opensuse.org InfoProvider| |cfarrell(a)suse.com AssignedTo|bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo. |dimstar(a)opensuse.org |novell.com | --- Comment #3 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> 2012-08-01 08:37:02 UTC --- Ciaran, I'll gladly take on the task of fixing this .spec file. My biggest question though would be what the correct tag would be. A small extract on license tags in all *branding* packages on my 12.1 system reveals a mix of GPLv2-0(+) and BSD3c to be used... none sound really sane. As for the hicolor-icon-theme-branding-openSUSE: the content of the package is collection of a few suse icons (suse.svg an variants of it as .png) Also, you state EULA is an old version: any updated variant that should be added to the package then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 773519] New: An error (mistake) in openSUSE reference manual
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773519 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773519#c0 Summary: An error (mistake) in openSUSE reference manual Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 12.1 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Documentation AssignedTo: ke(a)suse.com ReportedBy: pawel(a)stegierski.es QAContact: ke(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 i recently download openSuse manuals and find an mistake at openSUSE 12.1 reference manual, at second chapter section 2.1.5 Simple Remote Instalation via SSH .... This type of installation still requires some degree of physical access to the target system to boot for installation and determine the IP address of the installation target. The instal- lation itself is entirely controlled from a remote workstation using VNC to connect to the installer, but still requires user interaction for the actual configuration efforts. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. it must be .... 2.1.5 Simple Remote Instalation via SSH .... This type of installation still requires some degree of physical access to the target system to boot for installation and determine the IP address of the installation target. The instal- lation itself is entirely controlled from a remote workstation using SSH to connect to the installer, but still requires user interaction for the actual configuration efforts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 773845] Confirm license for hicolor-icon-theme-branding-openSUSE 12.2
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773845 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773845#c2 --- Comment #2 from Ciaran Farrell <cfarrell(a)suse.com> 2012-08-01 07:56:18 UTC --- GPL would be an unusual license for branding anyway. I assume this was a mistake then, and to fix the bug whoever is in charge of the package will add the correct license (as per the other SUSE owned branding packages), fix the spec file and resubmit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 769271] New: Installation and general kernel boot requires ACPI=OFF on newer Ivy Bridge Laptops
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769271 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769271#c0 Summary: Installation and general kernel boot requires ACPI=OFF on newer Ivy Bridge Laptops Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 12.1 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: evanevery(a)digitalintelligence.com QAContact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1 Official 12.1 OpenSuse release (x86-64) can not be installed without turning off ACPI support (ACPI=OFF). Right after beginning the installation (w/standard options), the system screen will flash and/or the system will halt (w/udev process failure). System can be installed w/ACPI=OFF but then no ACPI support is provided in the installed system (will not shut down, etc). Once an installation is completed with ACPI=OFF, removing the ACPI=OFF option from the resulting kernel boot parameters will result in the same behavior (flashing screen immediately after choosing boot option). This is quite easy to reproduce. This problem may be Ivy Bridge related. We have experienced this on a Clevo (Sager) P150EM laptop running BIOS versions 1.00.04 and 1.00.05. We have also tested this laptop with both the Nvidia graphics card option (Optimus) and also the AT Radeon option. Both systems experience identical ACPI problems regardless of the video card installed. Both Clevo and Sager are aware of this issue and state the problem is with the distro (of course). They claim the recent Ubuntu release installs and runs just fine... Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Begin baseline install with OpenSuse 12.1 x86-64 distro 2. Select option for new installation (do not change options) 3. Screen will crash with a flashing screen or just hang (with udev process failure message) Actual Results: Screen will flash shortly after selecting "New Install". System might also hang (identifying udev process failure in background). (Installing with ACPI=OFF works around this problem.) Expected Results: System should install properly and ACPI functions should be properly supported. Clevo/Sager P150EM (Ivy Bridge) Laptop Confirmed on BIOS V 1.00.04 and 1.00.05 Confirmed by us and also Sager/Clevo Problem exists with both Nvidia (Optimus) and Ati Radeon Video Card Options -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 773845] Confirm license for hicolor-icon-theme-branding-openSUSE 12.2
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773845 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773845#c1 Stephan Kulow <coolo(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|Legal Security Team | Component|License Issues |GNOME Version|unspecified |RC 1 AssignedTo|coolo(a)suse.com |bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo. | |novell.com Product|SUSE Linux Legal Issues |openSUSE 12.2 Target Milestone|--- |Factory QAContact|jw(a)suse.com |qa-bugs(a)suse.de --- Comment #1 from Stephan Kulow <coolo(a)suse.com> 2012-08-01 09:47:13 CEST --- I doubt anything in there is GPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 737535] New: trousers preinstall scriptlet invokes useradd without -r option giving system user tss default supplemental groups
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737535 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737535#c0 Summary: trousers preinstall scriptlet invokes useradd without -r option giving system user tss default supplemental groups Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Final Platform: x86 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.4 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: nedu(a)netscape.net QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111101 SUSE/3.6.24-0.2.1 Firefox/3.6.24 The rpm preinstall scriptlet for openSUSE 11.4 package trousers-0.3.6-3.1.i586 invokes useradd to add the tss system user with uid 98 and primary group tss. But the -r option is not given to useradd, so the tss system user also gains supplemental group membership in the default groups defined in /etc/default/useradd. $ rpm -q --scripts trousers preinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /usr/sbin/groupadd -g 98 tss 2> /dev/null || : /usr/sbin/useradd -u 98 -o -g tss -s /bin/false -c "TSS daemon" -d /var/lib/tpm tss 2> /dev/null || : Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. zypper rm trousers 2. userdel tss 3. in /etc/default/useradd, ensure GROUPS=video 4 zypper in trousers Actual Results: In /etc/group, system user tss has been given supplemental membership in video group Expected Results: The tss user should not gain membership in the default supplemental groups. To fix this, the preinstall scriptlet should invoke useradd with the -r option. This bug also exists in openSUSE 11.3 package trousers-0.3.6-3.1.i586 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 773517] New: Latest firefox upgrade crashes often VDPAU configuration seems wrong
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773517 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773517#c0 Summary: Latest firefox upgrade crashes often VDPAU configuration seems wrong Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 12.1 Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Firefox AssignedTo: bnc-team-mozilla(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: foolishewe(a)hotmail.com QAContact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 Firefox appears much more susceptible to crashes since it's latest upgrade, I now have it fail several times a day, both when running flash and not. I ran it from the command line and observed the following output from a crash: firefox *** nss-shared-helper: Shared database disabled (set NSS_USE_SHARED_DB to enable). NOTE: child process received `Goodbye', closing down Failed to open VDPAU backend libvdpau_nvidia.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run firefox 2. surf for a while 3. Actual Results: Crash throws me into Firefox's crash report window. This one I was able to reproduce two times in a row, but the 2nd time it took longer to trigger. firefox *** nss-shared-helper: Shared database disabled (set NSS_USE_SHARED_DB to enable). NOTE: child process received `Goodbye', closing down Failed to open VDPAU backend libvdpau_nvidia.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Expected Results: Pleasurable and crash free web surfing :-). The ability to issue a bug report without having to repeatedly restart the web browser and data entry. I am using a Toshiba Satellite P855-S5200, I think the video hardware is Intel all the way, so why would libvdpau_nvidia appear in a module name under VDPAU? firefox *** nss-shared-helper: Shared database disabled (set NSS_USE_SHARED_DB to enable). NOTE: child process received `Goodbye', closing down Failed to open VDPAU backend libvdpau_nvidia.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory rpm -qa --last | grep -y mozilla MozillaFirefox-14.0.1-2.33.1 Mon 23 Jul 2012 11:26:02 AM EDT MozillaFirefox-branding-openSUSE-5.0-7.6.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:34:05 PM EDT mozilla-nss-devel-3.13.5-9.16.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:33:16 PM EDT mozilla-nss-3.13.5-9.16.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:32:40 PM EDT mozilla-nss-certs-3.13.5-9.16.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:31:28 PM EDT mozilla-nspr-devel-4.9.0-3.3.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:31:28 PM EDT ca-certificates-mozilla-1.76-3.4.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:30:43 PM EDT mozilla-nspr-4.9.0-3.3.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:30:34 PM EDT mozilla-kde4-integration-0.6.3-6.1.2 Wed 04 Jul 2012 01:57:18 PM EDT But my hardware inquiry indicates: sudo /usr/sbin/hwinfo --gfx root's password: 09: PCI 02.0: 0300 VGA compatible controller (VGA) [Created at pci.319] Unique ID: _Znp.Af0T29Gu+A5 SysFS ID: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0 SysFS BusID: 0000:00:02.0 Hardware Class: graphics card Model: "Intel VGA compatible controller" Vendor: pci 0x8086 "Intel Corporation" Device: pci 0x0166 SubVendor: pci 0x1179 "Toshiba America Info Systems" SubDevice: pci 0xfb00 Revision: 0x09 Driver: "i915" Driver Modules: "drm" Memory Range: 0xf7000000-0xf73fffff (rw,non-prefetchable) Memory Range: 0xe0000000-0xefffffff (ro,non-prefetchable) I/O Ports: 0xf000-0xf03f (rw) IRQ: 41 (75908 events) I/O Ports: 0x3c0-0x3df (rw) Module Alias: "pci:v00008086d00000166sv00001179sd0000FB00bc03sc00i00" Driver Info #0: Driver Status: i915 is active Driver Activation Cmd: "modprobe i915" Config Status: cfg=no, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown Primary display adapter: #9 Checking my install/upgrade history: rpm -qa --last | grep -y mozilla MozillaFirefox-14.0.1-2.33.1 Mon 23 Jul 2012 11:26:02 AM EDT MozillaFirefox-branding-openSUSE-5.0-7.6.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:34:05 PM EDT mozilla-nss-devel-3.13.5-9.16.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:33:16 PM EDT mozilla-nss-3.13.5-9.16.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:32:40 PM EDT mozilla-nss-certs-3.13.5-9.16.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:31:28 PM EDT mozilla-nspr-devel-4.9.0-3.3.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:31:28 PM EDT ca-certificates-mozilla-1.76-3.4.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:30:43 PM EDT mozilla-nspr-4.9.0-3.3.1 Wed 04 Jul 2012 02:30:34 PM EDT mozilla-kde4-integration-0.6.3-6.1.2 Wed 04 Jul 2012 01:57:18 PM EDT rpm -qa --last | grep -y vdpau libvdpau1-0.4.1-17.1.2 Wed 04 Jul 2012 01:50:15 PM EDT And finally: zypper lr # | Alias | Name | Enabled | Refresh ---+----------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------+---------+-------- 1 | Education | Education | Yes | Yes 2 | KDE:KDE3 | KDE:KDE3 | Yes | Yes 3 | Packman_Current/Tumbleweed_(Jacobs-university.de_mirror) | Packman Current/Tumbleweed (Jacobs-university.de mirror) | Yes | Yes 4 | TOra_and_Oracle_related_repositories_for_OpenSUSE_12.1 | TOra and Oracle related repositories for OpenSUSE 12.1 | Yes | Yes 5 | Tumbleweed | Tumbleweed | Yes | Yes 6 | devel:languages:haskell | devel:languages:haskell | Yes | Yes 7 | devel:languages:misc | devel:languages:misc | Yes | Yes 8 | home:syeg | home:syeg | Yes | Yes 9 | home:tiwai | home:tiwai | Yes | Yes 10 | openSUSE:12.1 | openSUSE:12.1 | Yes | Yes 11 | openSUSE:12.1:Update | openSUSE:12.1:Update | Yes | Yes 12 | openSUSE_Current_OSS' | openSUSE Current OSS | Yes | Yes 13 | openSUSE_Current_non-OSS | openSUSE Current non-OSS | Yes | Yes 14 | openSUSE_Current_updates | openSUSE Current updates | Yes | Yes 15 | science | science | Yes | Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5