https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738050https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738050#c0
Summary: server:database/mongodb: Failure on db.dropDatabase()
using the RPM version
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE.org
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86-64
OS/Version: SLES 11
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: 3rd party software
AssignedTo: asn(a)cryptomilk.org
ReportedBy: patrick.meinusch(a)seitenbau.net
QAContact: opensuse-communityscreening(a)forge.provo.novell.com
Found By: ---
Blocker: ---
to reproduce:
1. install mongodb-2.0.1-5.2.x86_64.rpm from
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/database/SLE_11_SP1/x86_6…
2. start mongod: /etc/init.d/mongodb start
3. open a mongo shell to localhost:27017
4. use new database: use testdb
(optional) 5. insert document to a collection: db.coll.insert( { "key":"value"
} )
6. try to drop database: db.dropDatabase()
expected: database is dropped without any error
got: database is dropped but getting this error:
in shell:
{
"errmsg" : "exception: assertion db/pdfile.cpp:2158",
"code" : 0,
"ok" : 0
}
in log:
Wed Dec 21 13:31:23 [conn1] dropDatabase newdb
Wed Dec 21 13:31:23 [conn1] removeJournalFiles
Wed Dec 21 13:31:23 [conn1] Assertion failure i <= DiskLoc::MaxFiles
db/pdfile.cpp 2158
0x56ec5e 0x577d4f 0x811b9a 0x8121d8 0x8a0fdc 0x89d661 0x89df85 0x88df2a
0x89071b 0x7f54fa 0x973c3c 0x60c06a 0x7f1841eb45f0 0x7f184065684d
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo12sayDbContextEPKc+0x9e) [0x56ec5e]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo8assertedEPKcS1_j+0xbf) [0x577d4f]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo19_applyOpToDataFilesEPKcRNS_6FileOpEbRKSs+0x45a)
[0x811b9a]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo16_deleteDataFilesEPKc+0xc8) [0x8121d8]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo15CmdDropDatabase3runERKSsRNS_7BSONObjEiRSsRNS_14BSONObjBuilderEb+0xec)
[0x8a0fdc]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo11execCommandEPNS_7CommandERNS_6ClientEiPKcRNS_7BSONObjERNS_14BSONObjBuilderEb+0x871)
[0x89d661]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo12_runCommandsEPKcRNS_7BSONObjERNS_11_BufBuilderINS_16TrivialAllocatorEEERNS_14BSONObjBuilderEbi+0x565)
[0x89df85]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo11runCommandsEPKcRNS_7BSONObjERNS_5CurOpERNS_11_BufBuilderINS_16TrivialAllocatorEEERNS_14BSONObjBuilderEbi+0x3a)
[0x88df2a]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo8runQueryERNS_7MessageERNS_12QueryMessageERNS_5CurOpES1_+0x12eb)
[0x89071b]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo16assembleResponseERNS_7MessageERNS_10DbResponseERKNS_11HostAndPortE+0x6fa)
[0x7f54fa]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo16MyMessageHandler7processERNS_7MessageEPNS_21AbstractMessagingPortEPNS_9LastErrorE+0xdc)
[0x973c3c]
/usr/sbin/mongod(_ZN5mongo3pms9threadRunEPNS_13MessagingPortE+0x29a)
[0x60c06a]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x75f0) [0x7f1841eb45f0]
/lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d) [0x7f184065684d]
Wed Dec 21 13:31:23 [conn1] command newdb.$cmd command: { dropDatabase: 1.0 }
ntoreturn:1 reslen:99 113ms
When using the binary package from mongodb.org this bug is not reproducible
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731320https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731320#c0
Summary: server:database/mongodb: mongod does not respect
--noprealloc
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE.org
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: 3rd party software
AssignedTo: asn(a)cryptomilk.org
ReportedBy: jmatejek(a)suse.com
QAContact: opensuse-communityscreening(a)forge.provo.novell.com
Found By: ---
Blocker: ---
to reproduce:
1. install mongodb
2. edit /etc/mongodb.conf to say "noprealloc = true"
3. optionally, run mongod manually with --noprealloc option
expected result:
mongo starts without preallocating journals
actual result:
mongo does not care.
from mongodb.log:
note: noprealloc may hurt performance in many applications
Fri Nov 18 12:24:02 [initandlisten] MongoDB starting : pid=4902 port=27017
dbpath=/var/lib/mongodb 64-bit host=limetka.suse.cz
Fri Nov 18 12:24:02 [initandlisten] db version v2.0.1, pdfile version 4.5
Fri Nov 18 12:24:02 [initandlisten] git version: nogitversion
Fri Nov 18 12:24:02 [initandlisten] build info: Linux build05 2.6.37.6-0.7-xen
#1 SMP 2011-07-21 02:17:24 +0200 x86_64 BOOST_LIB_VERSION=1_44
Fri Nov 18 12:24:02 [initandlisten] options: { auth: "true", bind_ip:
"127.0.0.1", config: "/etc/mongodb.conf", dbpath: "/var/lib/mongodb", fork:
"true", logappend: "true", logpath: "/var/log/mongodb/mongodb.log",
nohttpinterface: "true", noprealloc: true, quiet: true }
Fri Nov 18 12:24:02 [initandlisten] journal dir=/var/lib/mongodb/journal
Fri Nov 18 12:24:02 [initandlisten] recover : no journal files present, no
recovery needed
Fri Nov 18 12:24:05 [initandlisten] preallocateIsFaster=true 25.86
Fri Nov 18 12:24:07 [initandlisten] preallocateIsFaster=true 25.88
Fri Nov 18 12:24:10 [initandlisten] preallocateIsFaster=true 24.26
Fri Nov 18 12:24:10 [initandlisten] preallocateIsFaster check took 8.42 secs
Fri Nov 18 12:24:10 [initandlisten] preallocating a journal file
/var/lib/mongodb/journal/prealloc.0
well yes, preallocate might as well be "IsFaster=true", but that still doesn't
justify spending extra three minutes at startup and eating 3GB for no good
reason whatsoever in a friggin development environment where performance does
not matter but 3GB of storage do
</frustratedRant>
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663358https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663358#c0
Summary: [zypper] can not install src rpm available on the
local disk
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE 11.4
Version: Factory
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: libzypp
AssignedTo: zypp-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com
ReportedBy: ma(a)novell.com
QAContact: qa(a)suse.de
Found By: ---
Blocker: ---
While
zypper in /tmp/my.rpm
works by creating a temp. repo containing my.rpm,
zypper si /tmp/my.src.rpm
does not work. Probably possible to use the same trick here as for ordinary
rpms.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629374http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629374#c0
Summary: desktop-data-openSUSE contains some KDE-specific bits
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE 11.4
Version: Factory
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: KDE4 Workspace
AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de
ReportedBy: vuntz(a)novell.com
QAContact: qa(a)suse.de
Found By: ---
Blocker: ---
Here are some bits in desktop-data-openSUSE that should probably live in some
of the kde branding packages (or in qt):
+ etc/kde4/: contains kdm/backgroundrc (should live in kdm-branding-openSUSE)
+ etc/profile.d/desktop-data.* and usr/share/desktop-data: the scripts have a
line to set QT_SYSTEM_DIR to /usr/share/desktop-data. This should really
live
in a qt package.
I'm also wondering about everything in etc/xdg/menus/,
usr/share/desktop-directories/ and usr/share/icons/: this contains the XDG menu
structure, except that GNOME now uses something else since we were not happy
with this structure and were unable to make any real progress on changing it.
LXDE also doesn't use it. So it's now more or less KDE-specific...
Finally, etc/skel/ contains public_html. Is this something you want to keep? I
know it annoys me to have this directory created.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700065https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700065#c0
Summary: the wiki produces invalid XHTML
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE.org
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86-64
OS/Version: openSUSE 11.4
Status: NEW
Severity: Minor
Priority: P5 - None
Component: Wiki
AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com
ReportedBy: giecrilj(a)stegny.2a.pl
QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com
Found By: ---
Blocker: ---
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/4.0.1
The wiki pages are declared to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional. A script inserted
into every HEAD violates this declaration.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Validate <URL: http://en.opensuse.org/Main_Page >.
2. Inspect the document source.
Actual Results:
1. Line 21, Column 16: required attribute "type" not specified
2. <script>
Expected Results:
1. No errors
2. <script type="text/javascript" >
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682920https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682920#c0
Summary: strange defaults in mailman
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE 11.3
Version: Final
Platform: Other
OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: Basesystem
AssignedTo: jmatejek(a)novell.com
ReportedBy: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de
QAContact: qa(a)suse.de
Found By: Beta-Customer
Blocker: ---
(partly copied from
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2007-November/058954.html
after seeing the same problem on 11.3)
I called "/usr/lib/mailman/bin/newlist mailman" to create the master mailing
list. Doing so resulted in the error
Bad owner email address: mailman@(unused)
The openSUSE Mailman package sets DEFAULT_URL_HOST and DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST to
'(unused)' in Defaults.py, which causes this problem.
Please use a default without parenthesis - according to the mail I linked
above, this should display the "correct" error message about an invalid list
address.
Of course it would be even better to have an error message that says
DEFAULT_URL_HOST and DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST need to be set - but that's probably
something for upstream.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640407https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640407#c0
Summary: SDL: erroneously uses xrandr-style mode switching
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE 11.3
Version: Final
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: X.Org
AssignedTo: bnc-team-xorg-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com
ReportedBy: jengelh(a)medozas.de
QAContact: xorg-maintainer-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com
Found By: Beta-Customer
Blocker: ---
Starting with 11.3, I am seeing a new issue with my "oversize" desktop
(2944x2208 VirtualSize on a 1280x1024 resolution).
Problem:
SDL-1.2.14.
When SDL switches to fullscreen 640x480 - for example, because the game is
configured to run in such resolution - or back, it changes the desktop size too
by means of xrandr or something along the lines of that.
Actual results:
Windows on my desktop are reordered, which is usually a result of the WM being
forced to do so because the desktop size (virtualsize) changed.
Resolution switching also takes significantly longer than it did before — this
is another sign that it switches desktop size (too), not just resolution.
First the screen goes black-with-backlight and after roughly 500ms, the TFT
screen finally gets the new 640x480 mode signal (I use VGA), which is evidenced
by the backlight going briefly off.
Expected results:
Previous behavior. In other worsd, leave desktop size as-is (and subsequently
keep my windows where they are) and _only_ change the resolution. The old
switching style is also way faster in that there is no black-with-backlight
delay.
Additional information:
Not all programs are affected. The entire group of Doom engines exhibits the
behavior for example, though I found that UnrealTournament99 does not. Both
Doom and UT use libSDL-1.2.so.0 (no static SDL as far as I can see).
Overriding the system SDL 1.2.14 libraries and using LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point
to SDL-1.2.13 libraries brings back the desired behavior.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509945
Summary: Enforce packaging of static libraries by rpmlint check
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE 11.2
Version: Factory
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: Basesystem
AssignedTo: dmueller(a)novell.com
ReportedBy: prusnak(a)novell.com
QAContact: qa(a)suse.de
CC: ro(a)novell.com, mrueckert(a)novell.com,
crrodriguez(a)novell.com
Found By: Development
We are trying to adopt the static libraries packaging scheme described on
http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
By adding rpmlint check we will enforce the correct packaging.
rpmlint should check whether the package contains *.{a,la} files and perform
these steps:
a) package contains *.la files, does not contain *.a files
-> throw error suggesting the packager to remove *.la files in %install
phase
b) package contains only *.la and *.a files
-> check if the name ends with "-devel-static", throw error otherwise,
suggesting the rename
c) package contains *.la, *.a files AND *.so files (and probably some includes)
-> check if the name ends with "-devel" AND package also provides
"-devel-static" symbol, throw error otherwise, suggesting the addition of
symbol
-> also point out that packager has to be sure that static libraries are
absolutely needed in the system. If not the package should be built with
--disable-static and *.la files removed in %install phase
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709260https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709260#c0
Summary: package bzip2 missing documentation
Classification: openSUSE
Product: openSUSE 11.4
Version: Final
Platform: i686
OS/Version: openSUSE 11.4
Status: NEW
Severity: Minor
Priority: P5 - None
Component: Basesystem
AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com
ReportedBy: giecrilj(a)stegny.2a.pl
QAContact: qa(a)suse.de
Found By: ---
Blocker: ---
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1;
Trident/4.0; GTB7.1)
The documentation for package bzip2 is not installed.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Read /usr/share/doc/packages/bzip2/README.
2. Find the referenced documentation.
Actual Results:
1.
Complete documentation is available in Postscript form (manual.ps),
PDF (manual.pdf) or html (manual.html). A plain-text version of the
manual page is available as bzip2.txt.
2. Nope.
Expected Results:
2. /usr/share/doc/packages/bzip2/manual.html
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.