January 2011 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 661415] New: Christmas/seasonal theme appears for thanksgiving even if we don't have one (in most of the World)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661415 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661415#c0 Summary: Christmas/seasonal theme appears for thanksgiving even if we don't have one (in most of the World) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Bootloader AssignedTo: jsrain(a)novell.com ReportedBy: masz0(a)yahoo.co.uk QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.0; U; fi) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.00 I'm not sure of the exact date, but I had the christmas theme appear a while back, then disappeared, then came back for christmas. I'm guessing it was for thanksgiving. We don't celebrate thanksgiving - most of the World doesn't. There is no way to configure the theme to only run on specified holidays, never mind localization (according to country, ethnicity and religion). If there is a way, the documentation doesn't point to that way. If it does use localization according to language, that is erroneous, since I use English language interface even if I'm Finnish, reside in Finland and observe the Finnish holidays. As such, the theme should be scrapped. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot Actual Results: Stupid seasonal theme where there is no holiday/celebration in sight. Expected Results: Normal theme in grub. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 483000] Can we Offer the .PDF Start-up Guide in a Different Space From Current Position to Download as Optional after current step 4
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483000 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483000#c13 Thomas Schmidt <tschmidt(a)novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED CC| |tschmidt(a)novell.com InfoProvider|rlihm(a)novell.com | Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #13 from Thomas Schmidt <tschmidt(a)novell.com> 2011-01-10 14:52:05 CET --- dup of #660475 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 660475 *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 592317] New: Can't build MySQL for Mandriva 2010 because of debug packages
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592317 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592317#c0 Summary: Can't build MySQL for Mandriva 2010 because of debug packages Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mhrusecky(a)novell.com QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- I tried to build MySQL for Mandriva 2010 and it is failing because: error: Package already exists: %package debug But I don't have it in my spec file and I have debuginfo disabled in flags so my guess is that some automatic script is getting run (even though I have debuginfo disabled) which adds too many debug packages (I have multiple packages in one specfile). Projects is server:database:UNSTABLE. Same spec file works fine for openSUSE and Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 582247] New: web UI show a project that do not exist
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582247 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582247#c0 Summary: web UI show a project that do not exist Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: andrea(a)opensuse.org QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; it; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091222 SUSE/3.5.7-1.1.1 Firefox/3.5.7 according to web UI this project exist: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=home:anubisg1:branches:X11:… but on any action you try to do on it, you receive a '404 project do not exist ' error darix asked me to open a bug. Reproducible: Always -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 568020] New: Revival of xgl package for openSUSE >= 11.1
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568020 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568020#c0 Summary: Revival of xgl package for openSUSE >= 11.1 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: 32bit OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: zbuhman(a)gmail.com QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com Found By: Community User Blocker: No Though one could argue that because XGL is no longer maintained and because the freedesktop project has decided to shift focus to AIGLX's development, it is this purpose of this bug report to point out that AIGLX in some cases is tangibly and severely inferior to XGL. Therefore, it is my proposal that an XGL package be maintained along with the usual configuration utilities (gnome-xgl-switch et al.) until such a time that AIGLX exceed's XGL's performance. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install openSUSE 11.0 (last version to include XGL with which to test relative performance with) with desktop effects, xgl, compiz-fusion (shortened to 'compiz' throughout the rest of this report), kde4 (kwin), etc... 1a. The test system in this case, is using a Radeon 9250. (I have had similar results with fglrx on a Radeon Xpress 200m as well; I suspect many other (esp. older/crippled radeons) may have similar results 2. Test compositing effects with XGL and then AIGLX making note of how each "feels" as well as real benchmarks. One could also compare Compiz vs. Kwin if they wish. Though, in my experience, Kwin is already slower than Compiz, it will be yet slower when used in conjunction with AIGLX (this part was included to eliminate Compiz as a potential source for blame/confusion). Actual Results: XGL, as "hackish" and outdated as it is, still outperforms AIGLX on (esp older) ATI cards (esp. ones too old for a compatible Catalyst driver which instead, as a result, *need* to use the Radeon module). (furthermore, it might be noted that using XGL with Compiz in 11.0 (the latest from the buildservice at the time) using the Radeon 9250 with the open source radeon module, acceptable framerates (around 100fps or so)(of course depending on what effects were enabled) were achievable whereas even on AIGLX in 11.2 (or 11.0) framerates are excruciatingly low whenever anything "real" is being done. For example, when rotating the "XGL" cube (transparent with fish/etc..) framerates might have dropped from 100 to 40-50 or so, but it was still mildly acceptable whereas using the same effects with AIGLX the framerate would drop from 20 to about 0.1fps; this is totally unacceptable, of course) Expected Results: Because AIGLX *is* more or less "the future" of Xorg's compositing, and is less "hackish" than XGL it should, inherently, therefore, have higher performance than XGL on this hardware. However, because it doesn't, even though the XGL code has indeed been removed from freedesktop.org's git and isn't in active development, and because AIGLX still, in some cases, as shown, does not have better performance than XGL (which is really what counts in this case; no matter how "well" the software is written, if it has poor performance, it is more or less rendered useless) it is my proposal that an XGL package still be readily installable and maintained in future releases (at least for 11.3 or so). Not sure how to categorize this. Since I, personally, would consider this of somewhat severe importance (XGL+Compiz, in my humble opinion, while doing normal desktop operations, is smoother than no compositing (which is in turn, faster than AIGLX)) due to it severely subtracting from one's overall experience/sanity caused by the slower redrawing one experiences on the same hardware without composting whatsoever, and because this was included in previous releases and has regressed in more recent ones, I would consider this to fit with the severity I have chosen. However, I realize that this may also be considered an enhancement; feel free to change this if it is deemed more appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 567357] New: osc search being case sensitive sucks
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567357 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567357#c0 Summary: osc search being case sensitive sucks Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: bitdealer(a)gmail.com QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Please change osc search so the search isn't case sensitive (making exact and not substring the default is fine). Reasoning: with the search being case sensitive it's unnecessary hard to find stuff. E.g. "osc search soundkonverter" vs "osc search soundKonverter" - HTF am I supposed that someone decided to use a capital K in the name? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 447894] Packages file missing i386 arch entries for osc and lzma tools
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447894 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447894#c4 Michael Schröder <mls(a)novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED InfoProvider|mls(a)novell.com | Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Michael Schröder <mls(a)novell.com> 2011-01-10 13:34:00 UTC --- We use the '-m' option as a workaround. (We still don't create multiple packages files.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 471701] Deleting .svn directories with find triggers %install-no-mkdir-buildroot
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471701 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471701#c5 Sascha Peilicke <speilicke(a)novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |speilicke(a)novell.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Sascha Peilicke <speilicke(a)novell.com> 2011-01-10 13:20:47 UTC --- Several solutions where provided, it doesn't hurt when the check chokes on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 447894] Packages file missing i386 arch entries for osc and lzma tools
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447894 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447894#c3 Sascha Peilicke <speilicke(a)novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |speilicke(a)novell.com InfoProvider| |mls(a)novell.com --- Comment #3 from Sascha Peilicke <speilicke(a)novell.com> 2011-01-10 13:17:36 UTC --- Micha, what's the state of this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 342657] wipebinaries does not wipe old logs (wipelogs needed)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342657 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342657#c4 Richard Guenther <rguenther(a)novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|NORESPONSE | --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther <rguenther(a)novell.com> 2011-01-10 13:08:55 UTC --- No response from assignee doesn't really count as "noresponse". Please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0