August 2010 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 626127] New: pam_mount suggests to specify "fskeyhash" when mounting a LUKS partition
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626127 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626127#c0 Summary: pam_mount suggests to specify "fskeyhash" when mounting a LUKS partition Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: bugreports(a)tittel.net QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100626 SUSE/3.6.6-1.2 Firefox/3.6.6 When mounting a LUKS-encrypted partition with pam_mount on login, pam_mount gives the following warning: pam_mount(rdconf1.c:1325): Volume /dev/sda8: consider specifying the fskeyhash pam_mount(rdconf1.c:1325): Volume /dev/sda8: consider specifying the fskeyhash (yes, the warning appears twice) Specifiying an fskeyhash for a LUKS-partition doesn't make sense (it's all in the LUKS header) and if I set an fskeyhash for a LUKS partition in /etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml it is actually ignored. In short: This warning shouldn't be there. If I look at bugs like http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580430 in den Debian bugtracker, it seems like pam_mount is probably warning about the missing fskeyhash in other situations (like mounting tmpfs) in which it doesn't make sense. I talked to the pam_mount upstream author (Jan Engelhardt) and this problem seems to be fixed in more current versions of pam_mount. Thanks in advance! Reproducible: Always -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 625987] New: Can't add 11.3 Sources repository
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625987 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625987#c0 Summary: Can't add 11.3 Sources repository Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: yuvalery(a)gmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100723 SUSE/3.6.8-1.1 Firefox/3.6.8 Sources repository does not work due to missing content.key Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. open yast repositories tool 2. choose community repos -> Sources 3. yast gives error about content.key while adding 4. the repo is empty Actual Results: No packages in Sources repo Expected Results: See packages in Sources repo -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 625883] New: Missing libpng-devel-32bit
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625883 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625883#c0 Summary: Missing libpng-devel-32bit Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development AssignedTo: pth(a)novell.com ReportedBy: bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100626 SUSE/3.6.6-1.2 Firefox/3.6.6 with 11.3, libpng-devel-32bit is removed. Libpng is needed for compiling wine from source (on a 64-bit machine). Could anybody trigger the building of libpng-devel-32bit? Or is there a way to build libpng-devel-32bit from the source package? I short search didn't turn up soemthing usefull. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Search for libpng-devel-32bit for 11.3 2.No result found 3. Actual Results: Doesn't apply. Expected Results: Doesn't apply -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 625763] New: Missing '/' in rpm output when updating branding pkgs
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625763 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625763#c0 Summary: Missing '/' in rpm output when updating branding pkgs Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Workspace AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: sven.zallmann(a)rwth-aachen.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100714 SUSE/2.0.6-2.2 SeaMonkey/2.0.6 Dear all, When I updated my system Sunday night I noticed the following "Additional rpm output" for two packages: - for kdm-branding-openSUSE: "Updating etc/sysconfig/displaymanager" - for kdebase4-workspace-branding-openSUSE: "Updating etc/sysconfig/windowmanager" Both statements are missing the leading slash ('/') in front of the file path. My question now is: Is this just a typo in the rpm output, or does rpm try to update the wrong, normally non-existing files relative to the directory from which 'zypper up' was started? I was requested to file this as a bug so that it doesn't get overlooked. The repository in question is KDE:Distro:Factory where KDE 4.4.93 (4.5-rc2) got updated to 4.4.95 (4.5-rc3). Reproducible: Didn't try Steps to Reproduce: 1. Have any KDE4 version previous to 4.4.95 installed. 2. Run 'zypper up' (verbosity at your choice), or 'zypper dup' if updating to 4.4.95 requires vendor change. 3. Watch the "Additional rpm output" when packages 'kdm-branding-openSUSE' and 'kdebase4-workspace-branding-openSUSE' are installed. Actual Results: see above Expected Results: Output should have read 'Updating /etc/sysconfig/displaymanager' and 'Updating /etc/sysconfig/windowmanager' respectively. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 625657] New: SuSEconfig.postfix and smtp_use_tls
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625657 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625657#c0 Summary: SuSEconfig.postfix and smtp_use_tls Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: 64bit OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: peter.ertel(a)linklift.net QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Firefox/3.6.7 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) SuSEconfig assigns smtp_use_tls=no if TLS certificates are configured. See 11.2 for reference. # diff /sbin/conf.d/SuSEconfig.postfix.modified /sbin/conf.d/SuSEconfig.postfix 563c563 < if test "$POSTFIX_SMTP_TLS_CLIENT" == "yes"; then --- > if test "$POSTFIX_SMTP_TLS_CLIENT" != "yes"; then Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. POSTFIX_SMTP_TLS_CLIENT="yes" 2. run SuSEconfig Actual Results: First the value is set correctly if test "$POSTFIX_SMTP_TLS_CLIENT" == "yes"; then $PCONF -e "smtp_use_tls = yes" $PCONF -e "smtp_enforce_tls = no" fi but then it fails on if test "$POSTFIX_SMTP_TLS_CLIENT" != "yes"; then test -s "$POSTFIX_SSL_PATH/$POSTFIX_TLS_CAFILE" && \ .. else $PCONF -e "smtp_use_tls = no" fi -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 625621] New: Icecc does not recognice latest GCC compiler flags (like -isysroot)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625621 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625621#c0 Summary: Icecc does not recognice latest GCC compiler flags (like -isysroot) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Infrastructure AssignedTo: mrueckert(a)novell.com ReportedBy: mailinglists(a)bluespirit.la QAContact: lrupp(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100627 Firefox/3.6.6 I'm using a toolchain from buildroot which uses the sysroot option. Now I get every time warning "found another non option on command line. Two input files?" and the Icecc builds everything locally. See at additional information: I ve attached a patch! Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Compile with "-isysroot /path/to/your/includes" (create a Makefile and execute it with -j12) 2. Check, that the compilation was completely done on your workstation. 3. Actual Results: Warning: "found another non option on command line. Two input files?" Everything is build non-distributed. Expected Results: Build distributed. --- icecc-0.9.4-orig/client/arg.cpp 2010-07-26 18:17:40.000000000 +0200 +++ icecc-0.9.4/client/arg.cpp 2010-07-26 18:17:42.000000000 +0200 @@ -248,6 +248,10 @@ || str_equal("-iprefix", a) || str_equal("-iwithprefix", a) || str_equal("-isystem", a) + || str_equal("-iquote", a) + || str_equal("-imultilib", a) + || str_equal("-isysroot", a) + || str_equal("-include", a) || str_equal("-iwithprefixbefore", a) || str_equal("-idirafter", a) ) { args.append(a, Arg_Local); -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 625593] New: Xdmcp improvements to fix all kind of Xvnc related issues
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625593 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625593#c0 Summary: Xdmcp improvements to fix all kind of Xvnc related issues Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: ASSIGNED Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: X.Org AssignedTo: sndirsch(a)novell.com ReportedBy: sndirsch(a)novell.com QAContact: xorg-maintainer-bugs(a)forge.provo.novell.com CC: eich(a)novell.com, mhopf(a)novell.com, max(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Thu Jul 8 16:49:54 CEST 2010 - max(a)suse.de - Fix some shortcomings in the xdmcp implementation. It used to suppress loopback addresses from the list of potential display addresses to report to xdm, even when talking to xdm through a loopback address. Now only display addresses of the same kind as the xdm connection are reported to xdm. This most notably helps Xvnc servers contacting the local xdm, because they were severely affected by the suppression of loopback addresses. Related openSUSE bugreports (AFAIK): #546632 #623254 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 34

[Bug 625527] New:=?UTF-8?Q?=20Star=20=E2=80=93=20openSUSE=20version=20crashes=20with=20buffer=20overflow=20while=20self=20compiled=20version=20works?=
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625527 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625527#c0 Summary: Star – openSUSE version crashes with buffer overflow while self compiled version works Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: ms(a)mschilling.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.60 The source code of the self compiled version is from the schily's site at: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/star/star-1.5.1.tar.bz2 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. /usr/bin/star -c f=/dev/null /usr/src/linux-2.6.34-12 Actual Results: ms@eeebox:~> /usr/bin/star -c f=/dev/null /usr/src/linux-2.6.34-12 *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/bin/star terminated ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x40)[0xb77cc6f0] /lib/libc.so.6(+0xe84e7)[0xb77ca4e7] /lib/libc.so.6(__strcpy_chk+0x3e)[0xb77c97be] /usr/bin/star[0x8070b55] /usr/bin/star[0x8061259] /usr/bin/star[0x806202e] /usr/bin/star[0x806202e] /usr/bin/star[0x806202e] /usr/bin/star[0x806202e] /usr/bin/star[0x806202e] /usr/bin/star[0x806202e] /usr/bin/star[0x806202e] /usr/bin/star[0x806202e] /usr/bin/star[0x806202e] /usr/bin/star[0x8062270] /usr/bin/star[0x804c290] /usr/bin/star[0x8051a33] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfe)[0xb76f8c0e] /usr/bin/star[0x804a551] ======= Memory map: ======== 08048000-0809c000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 38969 /usr/bin/star 0809c000-0809d000 r--p 00053000 08:03 38969 /usr/bin/star 0809d000-0809f000 rw-p 00054000 08:03 38969 /usr/bin/star 0809f000-080d7000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap] b6e7b000-b6e97000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389911 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b6e97000-b6e98000 r--p 0001b000 08:03 389911 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b6e98000-b6e99000 rw-p 0001c000 08:03 389911 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b6e99000-b6ea4000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389737 /lib/libnss_files-2.11.2.so b6ea4000-b6ea5000 r--p 0000a000 08:03 389737 /lib/libnss_files-2.11.2.so b6ea5000-b6ea6000 rw-p 0000b000 08:03 389737 /lib/libnss_files-2.11.2.so b6ea6000-b6eb0000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389741 /lib/libnss_nis-2.11.2.so b6eb0000-b6eb1000 r--p 00009000 08:03 389741 /lib/libnss_nis-2.11.2.so b6eb1000-b6eb2000 rw-p 0000a000 08:03 389741 /lib/libnss_nis-2.11.2.so b6eb2000-b6ec8000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389731 /lib/libnsl-2.11.2.so b6ec8000-b6ec9000 r--p 00015000 08:03 389731 /lib/libnsl-2.11.2.so b6ec9000-b6eca000 rw-p 00016000 08:03 389731 /lib/libnsl-2.11.2.so b6eca000-b6ecc000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b6ecc000-b6ed3000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389733 /lib/libnss_compat-2.11.2.so b6ed3000-b6ed4000 r--p 00007000 08:03 389733 /lib/libnss_compat-2.11.2.so b6ed4000-b6ed5000 rw-p 00008000 08:03 389733 /lib/libnss_compat-2.11.2.so b6ed5000-b76db000 rw-s 00000000 00:04 16023 /dev/zero (deleted) b76db000-b76dc000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b76dc000-b76df000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389726 /lib/libdl-2.11.2.so b76df000-b76e0000 r--p 00002000 08:03 389726 /lib/libdl-2.11.2.so b76e0000-b76e1000 rw-p 00003000 08:03 389726 /lib/libdl-2.11.2.so b76e1000-b76e2000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b76e2000-b7846000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389720 /lib/libc-2.11.2.so b7846000-b7847000 ---p 00164000 08:03 389720 /lib/libc-2.11.2.so b7847000-b7849000 r--p 00164000 08:03 389720 /lib/libc-2.11.2.so b7849000-b784a000 rw-p 00166000 08:03 389720 /lib/libc-2.11.2.so b784a000-b784d000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b784d000-b786a000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389788 /lib/libselinux.so.1 b786a000-b786b000 r--p 0001c000 08:03 389788 /lib/libselinux.so.1 b786b000-b786c000 rw-p 0001d000 08:03 389788 /lib/libselinux.so.1 b786c000-b7870000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389830 /lib/libattr.so.1.1.0 b7870000-b7871000 r--p 00003000 08:03 389830 /lib/libattr.so.1.1.0 b7871000-b7872000 rw-p 00004000 08:03 389830 /lib/libattr.so.1.1.0 b7872000-b787a000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 389865 /lib/libacl.so.1.1.0 b787a000-b787b000 r--p 00007000 08:03 389865 /lib/libacl.so.1.1.0 b787b000-b787c000 rw-p 00008000 08:03 389865 /lib/libacl.so.1.1.0 b788c000-b788d000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 b788d000-b78ac000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 398761 /lib/ld-2.11.2.so b78ac000-b78ad000 r--p 0001e000 08:03 398761 /lib/ld-2.11.2.so b78ad000-b78ae000 rw-p 0001f000 08:03 398761 /lib/ld-2.11.2.so bf8dd000-bf90b000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack] ffffe000-fffff000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso] Aborted ms@eeebox:~> Expected Results: ms@eeebox:~> /usr/local/bin/star -c f=/dev/null /usr/src/linux-2.6.34-12 /usr/local/bin/star: 40255 blocks + 0 bytes (total of 412211200 bytes = 402550.00k). ms@eeebox:~> The star-RPM verifies: ms@eeebox:~> rpm -V star SM5...GT. c /etc/default/rmt M....GT. c /etc/default/star ms@eeebox:~> Versions of star used: ms@eeebox:~> rpm -qf /usr/bin/star star-1.5final-42.1.i586 ms@eeebox:~> ms@eeebox:~> /usr/local/bin/star --version | grep star star: star 1.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) ms@eeebox:~> -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 625466] New: libexiv2-devel do not provide pkgconfig(exiv2) symbol
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625466 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625466#c0 Summary: libexiv2-devel do not provide pkgconfig(exiv2) symbol Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development AssignedTo: pth(a)novell.com ReportedBy: ilfirin.ms(a)gmail.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; cs; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Firefox/3.6.7 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) I created package libgexiv2 (gobject binding for exiv2). Package was build succesfully, but when I tried it to install, it fails with "nothing provides pkgconfig(exiv2) needed by libgexiv2-0-devel" This is not happening on openSUSE 11.2. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. build some package depends on libexiv2-devel 2. try to install it on openSUSE 11.3 3. suprise :-) Actual Results: nothing provides pkgconfig(exiv2) needed by libgexiv2-0-devel Expected Results: work ;-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 625439] New: logrotate error from cron: error: stat of /var/log/squidGuard/squidGuard.log failed: No such file or directory
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625439 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625439#c0 Summary: logrotate error from cron: error: stat of /var/log/squidGuard/squidGuard.log failed: No such file or directory Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: i586 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: koenig(a)linux.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- the daily cronjob in 11.3 sends an error of logrotate every night: error: stat of /var/log/squidGuard/squidGuard.log failed: No such file or directory SCRIPT: logrotate -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13