June 2007 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 279439] New: gaim shows smileys in time area
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 14 Aug '08

14 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=279439 Summary: gaim shows smileys in time area Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 10.2 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mhorvath(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Please see attached screenshot. The time was 11:25:08 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 6

[Bug 215434] New: Nautilus' Execute file permissions are not granular
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 14 Aug '08

14 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215434 Summary: Nautilus' Execute file permissions are not granular Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Beta 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: cmeadors(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de In right-click on file -> Properties -> Permissions, there is only a toggle for Execute permissions. That means either everyone can execute the file or no one. This doesn't allow for a user or a group to be allowed to execute it without allowing everyone. This is technically a feature request since the feature is not implemented. However I think the fact that there is no UI is Nautilus that provides the ability to set execute permissions for just the user (a core filesystem operation) make this a bug not and enhancement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 223909] New: Bootloader GRUB.pm line 1382
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 14 Aug '08

14 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223909 Summary: Bootloader GRUB.pm line 1382 Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: RC 2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: odabrunz(a)novell.com ReportedBy: locilka(a)novell.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com There is a perl syntax error at line 1382 in Core/GRUB.pm Screenshot of the error message and YaST logs will be attached. I'm not sure about the severity so 'Major' seems to be possible :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 19

[Bug 239770] New: Setting disk label error 1008 during installation; cannot install
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 14 Aug '08

14 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 Summary: Setting disk label error 1008 during installation; cannot install Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Blocker Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: martin(a)gnummep.co.uk QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Doing an install of of openSUSE 10.2 GM DVD, I get the following error when the install begins to partition the disk: --- Error Failure occurred during the following action: Setting disk label of disk /dev/hda to msdos System error code was -1008 --- This is a default (KDE) install, I told the install to use the entire disk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 25

[Bug 251091] New: gnome-main-menu autostart.desktop file in wrong directory
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251091 Summary: gnome-main-menu autostart.desktop file in wrong directory Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Alpha 1plus Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome-build(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: andreas.hanke(a)gmx-topmail.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de This commit http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-commit/2007-03/msg00166.html looks at least partially wrong because it moves the autostart.desktop file to /usr/share/autostart although this is *not* a valid autostart directory. /usr/share/gnome/autostart or /etc/xdg/autostart should be used. Reference: Bug 208680 (this was actually already fixed in the past and is now broken again) There is also a useless .la file (%{_prefix}/%{_lib}/nautilus/extensions-1.0/*.la), .schemas files are listed twice and the nonsense en_IGID locale is back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 261201] New: Process Control poorly documented
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261201 Summary: Process Control poorly documented Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Alpha 2plus Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Documentation AssignedTo: rwalter(a)novell.com ReportedBy: al4321(a)gmail.com QAContact: ke(a)novell.com Process control is poorly documented in openSUSE. (10.2, reference guide) While there was some documentation about: (in section 11.6.x) -ps -pstree -top The documentation structure is bad. There are some commands that are in different section: (section 20.3.2) -kill -killall I believe those must be unified under one sedction. Addtionally, some important Process Control commands are simply lacking: -nice -renice Mandrake Command-Line guide has excellent documentation on this topic: http://www.mandriva.com/fr/community/resources/documentation Unfortunately, it's not Free, so we can't use their documentation. I had a talk with Jana Jaeger, and she agrees that we must improve Novell Documentation. -Alexey "Technologov" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

[Bug 257299] New: oowriter does not auto complete for odt files
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257299 Summary: oowriter does not auto complete for odt files Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: richard.bos(a)xs4all.nl QAContact: qa(a)suse.de when a directory contains *.odt and *.odm files and oowriter is about to be launched from the command line, it (oowriter) does not auto complete for the *.odm files (master document files). So, this: # oowriter *.odm<tab><tab> does not work.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 9

[Bug 280005] New: osc: traceback if no route to host
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Aug '08

10 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280005 Summary: osc: traceback if no route to host Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com I was logged out of the LinuxTag WLAN which means - nameservice fully working - all other traffic /dev/null'ed at the router (traceroute shows two stations, then only stars) osc commit gave the following traceback in this situation: cb@cboltz:~/packages/home:cboltz/kdepim3> osc commit Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/osc", line 10, in <module> sys.exit( osc.main() ) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 240, in main return self.cmd(args) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 263, in cmd retval = self.onecmd(argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 379, in onecmd return self._dispatch_cmd(handler, argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 1109, in _dispatch_cmd return handler(argv[0], opts, *args) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/commandline.py", line 603, in do_commit upstream_rev = show_upstream_rev(p.apiurl, p.prjname, p.name) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/core.py", line 908, in show_upstream_rev m = show_files_meta(apiurl, prj, pac) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/core.py", line 903, in show_files_meta f = http_GET(makeurl(apiurl, ['source', prj, pac])) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/core.py", line 682, in http_GET def http_GET(*args, **kwargs): return http_request('GET', *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/core.py", line 673, in http_request fd = urllib2.urlopen(req, data=data) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py", line 121, in urlopen return _opener.open(url, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py", line 374, in open response = self._open(req, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py", line 392, in _open '_open', req) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py", line 353, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py", line 1109, in https_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPSConnection, req) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py", line 1076, in do_open raise URLError(err) urllib2.URLError: <urlopen error (8, 'EOF occurred in violation of protocol')> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 6

[Bug 280034] New: osc buildinfo has bad error handling
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Aug '08

10 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280034 Summary: osc buildinfo has bad error handling Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com osc buildinfo has bad error handling. Examples are a) running "osc buildinfo" in a directory that does *not* contain a .osc directory osc buildinfo openSUSE_10.2 x86_64 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/osc", line 10, in <module> sys.exit( osc.main() ) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 240, in main return self.cmd(args) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 263, in cmd retval = self.onecmd(argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 379, in onecmd return self._dispatch_cmd(handler, argv) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 1109, in _dispatch_cmd return handler(argv[0], opts, *args) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/commandline.py", line 968, in do_buildinfo package = store_read_package(wd) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/osc/core.py", line 1348, in store_read_package p = open(os.path.join(dir, store, '_package')).readlines()[0].strip() IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: './.osc/_package' b) in case of a "404" error (already reported in another bug) there's also a lengthly message with a backtrace (sorry, I don't have it available right now) Please add some error handling ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 13

[Bug 279866] New: No QA for patch descriptions
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Aug '08

10 Aug '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=279866 Summary: No QA for patch descriptions Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Maintenance AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Perhaps you remember bug 188011 where I reported a broken patch description. Today you released a new patch with the useless description This update fixes the patch of the last security-update. There were more not-so-good patch descriptions in the last months, but this is the worst one ever. Missing information: - What package? - What was fixed? I propose to do QA not only on the packages, but also on the patch description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 29