December 2006 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 203830] Start of OpenOffice extremely slow
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203830 pmladek(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jlp(a)holodeck1.com ------- Comment #9 from pmladek(a)novell.com 2006-12-06 02:27 MST ------- *** Bug 220274 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 220274] New: OpenOffice.org takes a very long time to open
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220274 Summary: OpenOffice.org takes a very long time to open Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Beta 2 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: OpenOffice.org AssignedTo: eward(a)novell.com ReportedBy: jlp(a)holodeck1.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de I just installed openSUSE 10.2 Beta 2 on my AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ computer with 1 GiB of memory. It takes about 1 minute and 45 seconds until the OOo Writer comes up after I click on the menu. It doesn't matter if this is the second or third start of OOo. It always takes this long. This is a lot longer than in Mandriva 2007 on the same computer or in Gentoo on my slower laptop with AMD Turion 64 and 768 MiB of memory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 10

[Bug 186828] wifi works manually but not with GUI tools
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186828 jg(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|jamesrome(a)alum.mit.edu | ------- Comment #20 from jg(a)novell.com 2006-12-06 02:23 MST ------- Ehm, you need to install the ndiswrapper kernel module package (ndiswrapper-kmp-default). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 226330] New: Online update fails to load updates indicated by ZEN - but there is workaround
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226330 Summary: Online update fails to load updates indicated by ZEN - but there is workaround Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: i386 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Update Problems AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: alpha096(a)tpg.com.au QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com ZEN indicated there was 1 update missing. I used on-line update and it found NO update - see screen shot. When I went into software management successfully and went to the bottom of the selection list and selected ZZZ All and then chose the menu option "in this list update if new version is available. Screen shot shows online update indicating Nothing to be installed and screen shot shows files being installed as a result of this workaround. Version 10.0 as I recall had NO issues at all with SUSE watcher and on-line update You can understand all and my frustrations and everyone else's. There have been so many versions of YOU during the life of version 10.1 it will go down as the release that could not update itself properly from day 1 and possible cannot do this correctly now. I understand that adhering to good development philosophy you never remove functionality that is suppose to be an enhancement and never revert to previous functionality. For 1 I would like SUSE watcher I don't know about you but the prospect of porting ZEN desktop updater from Novell has been an unwanted application. If the email support groups which discuss help group - most users are disabling the service. The only benefit ZEN has given us apart from headaches is the user has permanent escalated authority to install/uninstall software without root authority. IF it could apply new updates by itself ( which was part of the intended design of ZEN desktop updater so a company could distribute total applications or desktop updates on large networks under Windows) then it has merit. I feel quite strongly that giving the user the ability to install/delete not only software packages AND with just one tick the whole installation has provided NO helpful functionality and reading the group discussions it is despised and considered an internal security threat. With ZEN from day 1 we had on-line update issues that haunt us to this day and its interface with updating software via on-line update is highly questionable. What was the purpose of placing updating/deleting software in the users hands. IF ZEN was implemented in all its glory and was able to perform scheduled unattended updates it would be an advantage and that may be your thoughts. If it is not going to provide any further functionality than current - hard decisions need to be made as to is future trouble free running in further releases and made quickly now! Files to follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 6

[Bug 221229] New: oowriter takes ages to start
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221229 Summary: oowriter takes ages to start Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Beta 2 plus Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: OpenOffice.org AssignedTo: eward(a)novell.com ReportedBy: kkaempf(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Running oowriter takes several minutes to start. strace log will follow. Probably related to bug #221226 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

[Bug 203830] Start of OpenOffice extremely slow
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203830 pmladek(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kkaempf(a)novell.com ------- Comment #8 from pmladek(a)novell.com 2006-12-06 01:54 MST ------- *** Bug 221229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 225700] New: Yast does not add to the installation source list a local directory
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225700 Summary: Yast does not add to the installation source list a local directory Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: i586 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mauro.vittorini(a)telecomitalia.it QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com First excuse me for my bad English. In SuSE Linux 10.0 I used to install applications by means of the relative RPM from a local folder, adding the folder to the list of all available installation sources, selecting all the needed packages in the folder and finally starting Yast. Yast resolved all the RPMs dependencies and then installed flawnless them. Now I have just installed SuSE Linux 10.1, but I cannot use this procedure, because if I try to add a local folder to the list of all available installation source, Yast pops-up a window to confirm the task, but the folder does not really appears in the installation source list. So the RPMs cannot been installed (Yast gives out a message to inform that the packages cannot be founded). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 193095] Font of Gnome apps don't have antialiasing in KDE
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193095 ------- Comment #34 from sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net 2006-12-05 22:37 MST ------- If bug 214280 really is a duplicate of this one it has to be re-opened, since it is not fixed in the GM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 193095] Font of Gnome apps don't have antialiasing in KDE
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193095 ------- Comment #33 from sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net 2006-12-05 22:23 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=108455) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=108455&action=view) font rendering in OO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 193095] Font of Gnome apps don't have antialiasing in KDE
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193095 sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net ------- Comment #32 from sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net 2006-12-05 22:21 MST ------- It is not only anti-alias that is not used, but it seems that OO does no longer care to use the bytecode-interpreter for ttf, as it did in 10.1. I have aa disabled and set OO to use "system fonts" for GUI. But not only for the GUI ttf are not rendered by the bytecode interpreter as it seems. See attached screenshot and bug 226217. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0