Hi,
-----Original Message----- From: Adrian Schröter
Sent: 07 December 2019 12:46 To: openSUSE ARM ML (opensuse-arm@opensuse.org) Subject: [opensuse-arm] arm 32bit vs arm 32bit Hi,
I was going to add 32bit package configs to repackage armv7hl libs for aarch64 installations (for personal need, samsung binary only printer driver)
However, I noticed that armv7hl 32bit userland would conflict with aarch64_ilp32 definitions.
Was there already any discussion how a mixed arch installation should look alike?
My proposal would be (for a aarch64 installation):
armv[567]* libs should be installed in /lib (and /usr/lib) via *-32bit*.aarch64.rpm /lib to stay compatible with armv[567] installations.
aarch64_ilp32 libs should be installed in /lib-ilp32 via *-ilp32*.aarch64.rpm current config seems to put these in -32bit packages, what seems to be wrong to me.
Do we also need to take care about aarch32?
any opinion about this?
AFAIK, you cannot use armv7 libs/bins as is on arm64 systems. Guillaume
adrian
--
Adrian Schroeter
Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org