Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (856 mails)

< Previous Next >
[opensuse] Re: on something being monolithic and proprietary.
Linda Walsh wrote:
ianseeks wrote:
I stand by the use of monolithic being completely bogus, no matter how you try and redefine the meaning of monolith. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/monolithic?s=t
---
Then you stand without a defintion. dictionary.com doesn't define
monolithic w/r/t software -- though that SysD is large and its
design is set in stone would apply in an abstract sense.

Better would be a reference that includes software, like:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monolithic_application

A monolithic application is self-contained, and independent from other
computing applications. The design philosophy is that the application is
responsible not just for a particular task, but can perform every step needed
to complete a particular function.[1][2] Today, some personal finance
applications are monolithic in the sense that they help the user carry out a
complete task, end to end, and are "private data silos" rather than parts of a
larger system of applications that work together.

Sysd is not something that works with other parts to achieve its output.
It's design philosophy is to assume control of all pertinent
stages and system functions. As time progresses, more functions are
deemed necessary for it to do its job and are absorbed.

Another way to think about it -- is that monolithic software is the
opposite of "modular", where you can re-use different pieces of software
to accomplish the same task.

You may not like the definition, but if you would correctly look up the
use of the term in software, you'll find it an appropriate description.

Cheers!
-l








--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
This Thread
Follow Ups