Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (878 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse] DegradedArray event
  • From: Rodney Baker <rodney.baker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 01:10:04 +0930
  • Message-id: <689156749.3boKDcQN9Q@mako>
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:10:50 Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 03:48:00 PM Philippe Andersson wrote:
mdadm -Q -D /dev/md127

Sadly, I am none the wiser:


# mdadm -v -Q -D /dev/md127

/dev/md127:
Version : 1.0
Creation Time : Mon Apr 8 14:06:44 2013
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 1953513280 (1863.02 GiB 2000.40 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1953513280 (1863.02 GiB 2000.40 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 1
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Intent Bitmap : Internal

Update Time : Wed Sep 4 17:09:16 2013
State : active, degraded
Active Devices : 1
Working Devices : 1
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0

Name : acme.pacific:2
UUID : c6b77f62:9e280889:353ed7d7:9c8686d1
Events : 84030

Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 81 0 active sync /dev/sdf1
1 0 0 1 removed

This last line tells you the answer. ^^^^

/dev/md127 has only one active member - /dev/sdf1. Whatever else the system
thinks was part of that array has been "removed" from the array, therefore it
is reported as running in degraded mode.

It could be, though, that /dev/sdf1 used to be part of one of your other
arrays and for some reason is now detected as separate (but still having the
Linux-RAID partition type). Did you document what partitions you used when
first assembling the raid array(s)?


--
==============================================================
Rodney Baker VK5ZTV
rodney.baker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
==============================================================
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >