Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3135 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse] Need explanation - question 1
  • From: Tom Patton <thpnalb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:47:22 -0700
  • Message-id: <1173278842.13200.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 10:42 +0100, Verner Kjærsgaard wrote:
> Onsdag 07 marts 2007 07:48 skrev Ken Jennings:
> > On Friday 2006-12-01 15:52, usr wrote:
> > > ...
> > 
> 
> may we see the output of "df -h"?
> 
> 
Here's my layout, since about the 8.0 days, now fully loaded with
10.2.  /boot is ext2, all else is reiserfs.

master:~ # df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1             3.1G  193M  2.9G   7% /
udev                  506M  216K  506M   1% /dev
/dev/sda1              54M  9.6M   41M  19% /boot
/dev/md0               11G  6.6G  3.5G  66% /data1
/dev/sda10             39G  1.5G   38G   4% /home
/dev/sdb7             132G   61G   71G  47% /local
/dev/sda7             4.1G  1.4G  2.7G  34% /opt
/dev/sda9              11G   74M   10G   1% /srv
/dev/sda8             4.0G  9.2M  3.8G   1% /tmp
/dev/md1               11G  2.3G  7.8G  23% /usr
/dev/sdb2             5.1G  1.4G  3.7G  27% /usr/lib
/dev/sda3             5.1G  468M  4.6G  10% /var

When I do a fresh install, I copy /home into /data1 (ie /data1/home92),
then format everything except /data1 and /local.  (I'd hate to
accidentally loose one of the kids' homework papers...or the wife's
favorite recipe!)

I used to keep /usr and /usr/lib on separate hard drives, to improve
load speed, but now /usr is on raid, and touches both sda and sdb
anyway.  I can't tell a big difference.  I should probably rethink that
and include /local in a raid instead...next computer, I guess.

Tom in NM


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >