Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (5130 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] Re: GNOME vs KDE Redoux
  • From: Peter Onion <Peter.Onion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 10:02:11 +0100
  • Message-id: <1146560531.6273.17.camel@xxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 10:41 +0200, Sven Burmeister wrote:

> And SuSE 10.1 did not want to supply any kernel-tainting stuff anymore. What
> else then tainting is putting non-OSS stuff into (L)GPL code? If one does not
> want to have non-OSS bits in an OSS environment, then LGPL is not really what
> one wants to supply, as it encourages to use non-OSS bits.

SuSE providing non-OSS bits as compared to customers/users adding
non-OSS code to their installed systems later are two different issues.


< Previous Next >