Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3378 mails)

< Previous Next >
Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
  • From: Doug McGarrett <dougmack@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:02:08 -0400
  • Message-id: <200204240202.g3O22KpH023560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
One more time:

>Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:54:27 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <dougmack@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>
>The original message was received at Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:54:16 -0400 (EDT)
>from cvd-207-41-177-51.i-2000.net [207.41.177.51]
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><suse-linux-en.com>
> (reason: 550 5.1.1 <suse-linux-en.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... User unknown)
> (expanded from: <suse-linux-en.com>)
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>... while talking to mail.i-2000.com.:
>>>> DATA
><<< 550 5.1.1 <suse-linux-en.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... User unknown
>550 5.1.1 <suse-linux-en.com>... User unknown
><<< 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient)
>Reporting-MTA: dns; mail2.i-2000.com
>Received-From-MTA: DNS; cvd-207-41-177-51.i-2000.net
>Arrival-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:54:16 -0400 (EDT)
>
>Final-Recipient: RFC822; suse-linux-en.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>X-Actual-Recipient: RFC822; suse-linux-en.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Action: failed
>Status: 5.1.1
>Remote-MTA: DNS; mail.i-2000.com
>Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 <suse-linux-en.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
User unknown
>Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:54:16 -0400 (EDT)
>Return-Path: <dougmack@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Received: from dougmcga (cvd-207-41-177-51.i-2000.net [207.41.177.51])
> by mail2.i-2000.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with SMTP id g3O1sGpH023420;
> Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:54:16 -0400 (EDT)
>Message-Id: <200204240154.g3O1sGpH023420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>X-Sender: dougmack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
>Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:54:03 -0400
>To: ckm+survey@xxxxxxxx
>From: Doug McGarrett <dougmack@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [SLE] Survey for U.S. users
>Cc: suse-linux-en.com
>In-Reply-To: <20020423161733.GO7328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>I would be much happier if there were to be intermediat versions
>of SuSE , like 8.01, 8.02, etc, and that's what you geot when you
>bought the thing, rather than buying a version that has lots of
>known bugs in it, and you have to patch it. If SuSE knows of the
>bugs and patches, why aren't they folded in to the distro?
>
>At 09:17 04/23/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I've been asked by the marketing folks to get suggestions on how the
>>International version of SuSE Linux could be improved for the US.
>>If you have any suggestions regarding features that could be
>>added/improved I'd really appreciate if you'd send them to the
>>reply-to address and not to the list. Suggestions like "Please
>>upgrade package foo to version x.y" aren't terribly helpful,
>>suggestions like "Please be a little less conservative with
>>package updates" are. You get the idea...
>>
>>I often say that there's no point in complaining about things on this
>>list because it's not read by the people who make a lot of the big
>>decisions; this is your chance to bypass the feedback@xxxxxxxx
>>bottleneck and give input directly to them. I'll stop collecting
>>feedback on Monday, Apr. 29 so you have some time to think about

>>it.
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>--
>>
>>-ckm
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
>>For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
>
>>Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
>>
>


< Previous Next >
This Thread
  • No further messages