2 May
2012
2 May
'12
13:47
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 09:52 -0700, John Andersen wrote:
On 5/1/2012 2:17 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
There's no ground for treating the signature separately. That view is contrary to the entire history and meme of email sigs on the internet.
Who cares. Any 'overall convention' is trumped by the specified policies and conventions of the specific forum or list.
Often these are inserted by a script, totally disconnected from message content. You are advocating treating random witticisms equally with directly written content.
Turn such foolishness *off*. It does not contribute and, obviously from that this thread even exists, occasionally distracts and sidelines the 'actual' content.