-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2006-11-09 at 14:42 -0000, Dave Howorth wrote:
Private answers are private and should be archived diferently from the list mail.
My archives are *mine*. What I choose to put in them and how I choose to organize and access them are *my* decisions.
You are free to organize yours how you wish but please don't try to insist that I must organize mine in the same way as yours.
Of course you are free to organize it as you like! But I'm also free to think that it is a wrong way, that for instance can lead you to answer in public a private answer, as Basil said. If you ask any question at all in a public list, you may receive answers of many types. If people think that what you intend to do is not perceived as correct or the best method, they will probably tell you so. We may not restrict ourselves to give an straight answer if we think is an incorrect method.
Or shall we all switch to an M$ trusted platform? :)
That doesn't have anything to do with this.
What will be the header for the amd64 list, please?
X-Mailinglist: opensuse-amd64 Delivered-To: opensuse-amd64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hmmm. I guess I wasn't pedantic enough for you when I asked that question. Taken in context, I think it's clear that what I meant to say was:
'What will be the equivalent string in square brackets on the subject line of mails in the replacement for the suse-amd64 list, please? (i.e. the replacement for "[suse-amd64]")'.
Anyway, I've said it now.
I knew what you wanted to ask, but that's not what you asked in fact :-P Anyway, it is obvious, isn't it? "[opensuse-amd64]"
As said in http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-amd64/2006-11/msg00001.html
I guess as we're being pedantic, the correct archive reference is: http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2006-Nov/0003.html which oddly enough I am aware of as a list member :)
The archive has already been migrated. You can check for yourself that they contain "[suse-amd64]" in the subject line, not yet the new token.
And the answer to my question isn't in that message.
Perhaps because we all think that filtering on the subject line is "incorrect" :-P
I'm beginning to wonder. Was it the real Carlos E. R. or Gandalf who replied to me?
No, it was Mithrandir. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFU1OGtTMYHG2NR9URAhhEAJ9hLjyQMpuq8QfpMEUBf0C98XzUUACfduK+ gSLvLQDyvKSyFCly5NDfcg4= =OI5m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----