On 11/21/2014 09:27 AM, jdd wrote:
Le 21/11/2014 15:23, Greg Freemyer a écrit :
I always like to know exactly where packages are coming from so I use:
looks like repo priority is deprecated, I nearly never see discussion about it, then I gess it's better to hav new repositories have a lower number than old if a repository change is expected?
Repo priority is one of those things that are in the "don't fiddle with it unless you are absolutely sure" class. You reasoning for why a new (do you mean newly added or what?) repository should have a lower priority makes no sense. All in all the reasoning I've seen for altering priorities is shaky. This is a facility that could be removed with asymptotically close to zero impact apart from upsetting a few who use -- well probably abuse -- it. For my sins, I tried it one and it led to complications and mistakes and broke my system. If you think you know what you're doing playing with priorities you're most likely mistaken! If you mean repositories for 13.2 should have a lower priority than ones for 13.1 then WTF ARE YOU DOING? WHY ARE YOU MIXING REPOSITORIES FOR DIFFERENT SYSTEMS? Quite apart from what ken said about different numbering schemes, it makes no sense. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org