On 2017-04-14 21:42, stakanov wrote:
In data venerdì 14 aprile 2017 21:26:15, Michal Suchánek ha scritto:
Such as konqueror? It's a kind of zombie of a web browser that nobody can take seriously for years already but it's still *the* KDE web browser .. because k* I like Konqueror. It has gotten too little attention. But still it is, IMO, better the then google chromium crap. Does not crack on my privacy. And sometimes, when all fails, well, it happens that konqueror still works.
Firefox does not crack on your privacy any more that Konquerer AFAIK. Yes, Chrome is bad with always asking Google if it can fart. Either of these are browsers that work for most of the web which is something Konqueror cannot claim.
Question is: why does it bother you. Uninstall it. There are AFAIK no dependencies that forces you to use it.
I do not even install it for years already. The thing is: user installs *the* KDE web browser. It fails to render their favorite web page. That's a bad KDE experience because it is the KDE web browser. Compared to that GNOME used to have GNOME branded Gecko based Galeon. They figured they cannot keep up maintaining it so they just dropped it and nobody heard of it for years - see the difference there? Thanks Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org