Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Tuesday 2016-05-17 03:28, L.A. Walsh wrote:
Martin Pluskal wrote:
I would like to kindly ask you to refrain from spreading misinformations. *Usually*, I also give references, like above -- however, giving references on this list is a waste of time, since
this is the group that brought SisD in "just to speed up boot"
I guess we won't be seeing a reference to _that_ statement either.
Here, let me google that for you: google: opensuse systemd faster replacement systemV boot 2nd open suse article down @ title: sisd: “ boot faster and cleaner with openSUSE 12.1 December 22nd, 2011 by Manu Gupta --- compare to user comments below: 1) kleineaeug @ December 28, 2011 at 05:15: I measured the boot time and there was SisVInit THREE TIMES faster than sisd 1a) Bobby - December 28, 2011 at 15:13 I also have the feeling that SisV with it’s init process was a lot faster than Sisd. I don’t know how that can be possible since the processes start parallel but my system boots a lot slower than it used to with openSuse 11.4. ... more commments down lower about missing 3rd party benchmarks; ...some laptop users saying it is faster [noted -- especially those with SSD's] ... mixed comments about how to debug slow sisD boot times, of which, many are listed... That's from a 1st page google search. I also remember many other discussion - like how a major, slowdown was caused by a logging bottleneck for those not having SSD's. Usually I expect at least minimal goo-fu... And how much time was wasted writing this? vs. How many people will have their minds changed by pointing to references for an early opensuse promo for for sisD being system boot/start time? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org