On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 19:25 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:26 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 01:53 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 14:59 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 12:48 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote:
Me too. I use Google Desktop Search because it is more mature tool and consumes less CPU power. Its also indexes far less last time I checked. That's nice to hear, thanks! I'll test it on Factory over the weekend. I suspect that what JP is saying, is that it indexes far fewer file formats, not that its indexer runs faster. At least, that's how I read it. It looks like you read it differently, since your reply is so positive :)
Yep, I've read it differently :(
BTW I've noticed that it indexes fewer file formats than GDS (which is one of the reasons why I use GDS), but I'll test it on Factory anyway. On my openSUSE 10.3 I'll keep using GDS for now.
Ok, but I think he meant that GDS indexes fewer file formats than Beagle :) -- Hans Petter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org