On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 18:56 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Today I updated wallpaper-branding-openSUSE from 13.2-10.39 to 13.2-10.40.
Curious what might have changed, I compared
md5sum $(rpm -ql wallpaper-branding-openSUSE)
before and after the change and -- same, same, no difference!?
(Indeed, this is the 5th update of wallpaper-branding-openSUSE this year, which really is a bit odd given the contents.)
Interesting one :)
let me try to explain:
wallpaper-branding-openSUSE (the 'binary' RPM) is built off the source
rpm 'branding-openSUSE' (as a subpackage).
WE currently have logic to 'not publish packages, if they did not
change', but that takes only the 'full set of binary RPMs produced in
one build run' into account.
Now, for branding-openSUSE, there are a couple binaries produced, one
being gfxboot-branding-openSUSE (related to the bootsplash)
as can be seen in the build log at
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory/branding-... (scroll up about '3 pages'), there are some diffs in the cpio archive /etc/bootsplash/themes/openSUSE/bootloader/message, which in turn triggers the entire set to be published.
Might be interesting to catch what exactly is changing there and if it's
possibly to avoid this.
Cheers,
--
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger