[opensuse-factory] wallpaper-branding-openSUSE updated, even without changes?
Today I updated wallpaper-branding-openSUSE from 13.2-10.39
to 13.2-10.40.
Curious what might have changed, I compared
md5sum $(rpm -ql wallpaper-branding-openSUSE)
before and after the change and -- same, same, no difference!?
(Indeed, this is the 5th update of wallpaper-branding-openSUSE
this year, which really is a bit odd given the contents.)
Gerald
--
Dr. Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 18:56 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Today I updated wallpaper-branding-openSUSE from 13.2-10.39 to 13.2-10.40.
Curious what might have changed, I compared
md5sum $(rpm -ql wallpaper-branding-openSUSE)
before and after the change and -- same, same, no difference!?
(Indeed, this is the 5th update of wallpaper-branding-openSUSE this year, which really is a bit odd given the contents.)
Interesting one :)
let me try to explain:
wallpaper-branding-openSUSE (the 'binary' RPM) is built off the source
rpm 'branding-openSUSE' (as a subpackage).
WE currently have logic to 'not publish packages, if they did not
change', but that takes only the 'full set of binary RPMs produced in
one build run' into account.
Now, for branding-openSUSE, there are a couple binaries produced, one
being gfxboot-branding-openSUSE (related to the bootsplash)
as can be seen in the build log at
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory/branding-... (scroll up about '3 pages'), there are some diffs in the cpio archive /etc/bootsplash/themes/openSUSE/bootloader/message, which in turn triggers the entire set to be published.
Might be interesting to catch what exactly is changing there and if it's
possibly to avoid this.
Cheers,
--
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
El 28/01/15 a las 15:05, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger escribió:
Might be interesting to catch what exactly is changing there and if it's possibly to avoid this.
For the start..first we need caa cpio with the --reproducible option. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/cpio.git/commit/?id=3945f9db44c935608caa5f0... .. or switch to bsdcpio that does produce reproducible archives by default. then we can figure out what exactly is going on here ;-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Jan 28, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Today I updated wallpaper-branding-openSUSE from 13.2-10.39 to 13.2-10.40.
Curious what might have changed, I compared
md5sum $(rpm -ql wallpaper-branding-openSUSE)
before and after the change and -- same, same, no difference!?
(Indeed, this is the 5th update of wallpaper-branding-openSUSE this year, which really is a bit odd given the contents.)
This is fixed in current build-compare, which is in Staging:somewhere. Blocked by libsegv.. Olaf -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 09:22 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Today I updated wallpaper-branding-openSUSE from 13.2-10.39 to 13.2-10.40.
Curious what might have changed, I compared
md5sum $(rpm -ql wallpaper-branding-openSUSE)
before and after the change and -- same, same, no difference!?
(Indeed, this is the 5th update of wallpaper-branding-openSUSE this year, which really is a bit odd given the contents.)
This is fixed in current build-compare, which is in Staging:somewhere. Blocked by libsegv..
Then it must be staging :A, which is the only one being affected by
libsigsegv; just a moment ago, I commited a workaround for :A to not
block on this... so if build and openQA keep up, we shoul dbe able to
accept :A rather soon.
Dominique
--
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
participants (4)
-
Cristian Rodríguez -
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger -
Gerald Pfeifer -
Olaf Hering