https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223252 mfabian@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Comment #17 from mfabian@novell.com 2007-01-19 07:17 MST ------- Jan S> Well.. for me the difference from 10.0 is really HUGE. I can see it on Jan S> letters with curves like 'S', 'O' or 'C'. It looks as though curved Jan S> parts were a bit transparent. On the pother hand, some parts of other Jan S> letters are to thick. Of course this cannot be seen anymore if *everything* is very bold and blurred which is what you get if you use the autohinter. [... firefox, different problem ...] Jan S> > font rendering with anti-aliasing currently always looks Jan S> > better with dark fonts on a light background, Jan S> In 10.0 white fonts on dark background looked perfect. No, anti-aliased font rendering of white fonts on a dark background always had problems on Linux. This has never been fixed. Most likely you didn't see it as clearly as you see it now because the autohinter was used by default on 10.0 and everything was thus rendered much bolder. It is less obvious then. Jan S> > I cannot see anything wront Jan S> > with your screen shot, the fonts are very sharp. Jan S> Jan S> Believe me.. if they were I wouldn't take time for reporting this :( Your amarok screen shot is almost as perfect as can be apart from the "light fonts on a dard background problem". Please try the autohinter. Closing this bug as WORKSFORME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.