There seems to be doubt about displaying package descriptions. What do we want to do with lists within a package description? For example, see the squid3 package: Squid is a caching proxy for the Web supporting HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. It reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. Squid 3.0 represents a major rewrite of Squid and has a number of new features. The most important of these are: - Code converted to C++, with significant internal restructuring and rewrites. - ICAP implementation (RFC 3507 and www.icap-forum.org) - Edge Side Includes (ESI) implementation (www.esi.org) Most user-facing changes are reflected in squid.conf. This is just running text, but the writer probably meant: ... Squid 3.0 represents a major rewrite of Squid and has a number of new features. The most important of these are: - Code converted to C++, with significant internal restructuring and rewrites. - ICAP implementation (RFC 3507 and www.icap-forum.org) - Edge Side Includes (ESI) implementation (www.esi.org) Most user-facing changes are reflected in squid.conf. or something similar. In other packages, you will find stars (*) to denote list items. Do we still want to the "Authors" as part of the package description? -- Karl Eichwalder R&D / Documentation SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@opensuse.org