Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett write:
I have noticed the following:
Our code depends on rubygem-relevance-rcov, which is a package that follows a now obsolete github convention. I have packaged rubygem-rcov.
Would it be feasible to replace it for this iteration?
I think it is not good idea to depend on tool which generate test-coverage. Why we should depend on it? Lets make it only optional dependence. I see it same problem like if every java package depend on FindBugs software.
Also we have ruby-rpam which is based on http://gitorious.org/opensuse/yast-rest-service/trees/master/rpam
It seems now rpam is even released as a gem from its author (Sept 2009). I have packaged it as rubygem-rpam, should we switch to it?
I think yes, now it is good time to test possible regression in this package.
Then we have ruby-polkit, which I would also look into make it a rubygem too. But I have no progress here.
-- Josef Reidinger YaST team maintainer of perl-Bootloader, YaST2-Repair, parts of webyast -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@opensuse.org