OBTW: Since I subscribe to this list there is no point in cc'ing me. On 10/22/2014 02:52 PM, Banga Gong wrote:
When did this vote occur?
Development under Linux has never been about a democracy but about those who take an initiative and develop something. Either it gets used and accepted by the community or not. The only 'fascist' element that I've seen is that on occasions Linus is outspoken. There's a saying about "vote with your feet". If there's a vote going on its to accept systemd simply because the vast numbers of users are not , repeat NOT deserting systemd based implementations.
This has been foisted on the OpenSUSE community without ANY prior discussion.
Ah. BIG LIE time again.
Many who you say "agree" with you simply have no opinion because they donb't know ANY of the issues conerning systemd.
I think you mean "they don't care". For them its a "difference that makes no difference". Well, perhaps it makes debugging easier, state machines are ridiculously easy to debug, as any hardware engineer will tell you. They are much more deterministic. That they don't know the issues may well be the case because they don't care, all they care is that their system works. Maybe it works faster now, but that's a side effect and not a design criteria.
Typical leftist -- always trying to inflate the numbersof people who agree with you by counting people who do not, and otherwise trying to inflate the appearance of populareity for your pet causes.
Are you calling me a leftist? Strange. Most people, who deal with me, my managers and peers, call me a conservative. I fail to see what politics has to do with coding system administration. And even if you want to discuss that, this forum is not the place for it. Still, people project what they want to believe. You probably believe that 'leftists' is an insult. As such it says more about you than it does about me.
Try this for once: HONESTY
You'll be amzing at how many enemies it do NOT make.
ROTHFLMAO! You confuse a few concepts here. You believe that you are honest when you are making personally intimidating, insulting and tactless remarks? Even if that were so, its certainly no way to to lead people to accept what you say and come to agree with your views. It seems you can't discuss the technical merits of a piece of code without resorting to personal insults. -- /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML Mail / \ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org