On 2014-07-03 15:44, michael norman wrote:
On 03/07/14 14:27, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2014-07-03 15:02, michael norman wrote:
On 03/07/14 12:24, Carlos E. R. wrote:
...
I am unfamiliar with record makers designing their products to cope with any of this.
Because they hide from you the real facts.
Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me, can you point me to the "real facts"
Any sound engineer would know and understand what I mean. Sorry, I can not explain, if you base your arguments on "I hear the difference or not". Any analog world technique you use has engineering compromises. You can build better tools, better filters, improve everything... depending on the money you invest. But every adjustment or improvement you do has measurable unwanted consequences (for which you can try to compensate, too, adding steps).
Any competent phono preamplifier is and has been for decades, designed to process the signal from the phono from the non linear RIAA curve into a linear signal.
ROTFL! X'-)
Dunno what your last line means, sorry if i'm stupid
No, you are not. But you are not a sound engineer, or you would know why I say that a perfect adjustment to the RIAA curve is impossible. You can read about some of the complexities in the wikipedia article.
I'm an engineer. What my ear says it hears is irrelevant.
Well I'm labouring under the misconception that what you experience be it music or anything else depends upon your senses, dunno where it leaves you if you don't trust them
My senses say that audio CD is perfection >:-) -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)