Damian Ivanov wrote:
It is very useful for schools, callcenters etc.
Handhelds are a hype. Desktop and Laptop can be considered Desktop. Also everyone owns some PC. For any other misinformation in your answer it was just too long for me so I didn't read it anymore.
Given that reading is hard for you, you might have missed these: IDC Press Release PC Shipments Post the Steepest Decline Ever in a Single Quarter, According to IDC 10 Apr 2013 Worldwide PC shipments totaled 76.3 million units in the first quarter of 2013 (1Q13), down -13.9% compared to the same quarter in 2012 and worse than the forecast decline of -7.7%, according to the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker. The extent of the year-on-year contraction marked the worst quarter since IDC began tracking the PC market quarterly in 1994. The results also marked the fourth consecutive quarter of year-on-year shipment declines. http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24065413 ----------------------- Microsoft quietly kills off the desktop PC Extremetech-http://www.extremetech.com/computing/115003-microsoft-quietly-kills-off-the-... ------ Flight of the Desktops Soon there will be no reason to have a big, boxy computer on your desk. (Slate-http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2010/06/flight_of_the_de...) -Forecast: Share of US Consumer PC Sales By Form Factor, 2008 to 2015. (graph attached if it comes through, else see article). The portable laptops and tablets of tomorrow won't have the power to do multiseat-- they'll be lucky to support 1seat. All heavier computing is expected to move into the clouds where it can be sold to us as a service. One of the main roots of the problem: Intel can't continue earnings growth by selling desktop cpu's -- they can't make them "faster" (GHz), but they can make them "broader" (more cpu's)... but to recoup investment on a 100Core machine, they need to sell it at a premium price tag that will be good for businesses to provide "rental services" to end users.
systemd the solution for 99.9% of users.
Just like MS is used on 90+% of the computers doesn't mean it is *good*. systemd's concepts and configs come right out of MS's designs -- even down to the config files used to config systemd. As for the rest that you didn't read, it's about *realities* in families about sharing computers. They can't even share phones, and you think they are going to share a computer? Get real. The market/problem space this is trying to solve is a small and SHRINKING part of the market. It *MAY* be it will be able to put to use in data centers to manage a 100core machine with 100 virtual graphics devices /seats that will map to a user's tablet, but that's a far cry from needing to support multiple GPU's, sound cards etc. The documentation for systemd is HUGE. If you can't read something this short, then systemd is not for you. L.