-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, 2013-06-19 at 08:13 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
At that level does it really matter what the nomenclature is? "ethX" is nice but the alternative aren't show stoppers.
If it doesn't matter, why not let the names be what they were, why change? What's the rationale for changing the names, do we need that?
There is roughly zero rationale, but rest assured Carlos, you DO need it. Don't your network interfaces change their names all the time?
Nope, I have never seen that. I have eth0, eth1, ppp0, lo, wlan0 in the lappy... and vmnet something for those from vmaware. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 12.3 x86_64 "Dartmouth" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlHBUJgACgkQtTMYHG2NR9WN6wCfZ6JELegkSRjsXuc3BFZTDRPM jjQAn270/nCiFvDY3xVWRHi3vI0RVHDs =MUgo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org