On Monday 21 April 2008 07:49:42 pm John Andersen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Rajko M.
wrote: On Monday 21 April 2008 04:07:04 am Charles philip Chan wrote:
Rikard Johnels
writes:
The first mail from Charles gave me a valid signature, Message was signed by cpchan@sympatico.ca (Key ID: 0xDDEA4FCB229BC0F6). The signature is valid, but the key's validity is unknown.
but the second did not. Message was signed by cpchan@sympatico.ca (Key ID: 0xDDEA4FCB229BC0F6). Warning: The signature is bad.
Hum, this is getting stranger by the minute. I don't know why it works one time and not the other.
Charles
I don't know much about gpg, so I don't know is any problem that my kgpg imported 2 keys with the same value 229BC0F6.
Two keys , or one key with multiple subkeys?
KGpg 1.2.2 (KDE 3.5.9-57.3). When I expand all items, I can see: 1) main line with key, 2) than 2 lines with the same key that start with signature icon, 3) than ElGamal subkey that has different value and 4) one more line that belongs to subkey starting with signature icon and the same key as the first 3 lines. Total is five lines. Other keys have 4 lines, unless user has more signatures, ie. in 2) I don't see 2 lines in other signatures. The entry is imported from the key server. -- Regards, Rajko http://en.opensuse.org/Portal needs helpful hands. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org