Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
Mike McMullin wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 22:32 -0500, Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
Philip Dowie wrote:
On Thursday 28 February 2008 19:11, Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
A) Personal spite can in no way be equated with Fascism. B) Banning someone for irrelevant, uncalled-for, slanderous and hateful rhetoric is entirely appropriate. Isn't the phrase we are looking for here "please, don't feed the trolls"?
If Henne's going to be a disrespectful jerk, then I'm going to call attention to it, until he stops.
Did you miss the part where he is the list owner?
Acting on behalf of Suse this list is not for his own personal whims.
Every single time he's banned me, it's been complete BULLSHIT and I'm fed up with it.
Oooow, that this mean that we have seen the last of you as of this (above) message? Maybe we may see you in print at Amazon with a title like, "When your wife asks for an applet for her browser, give her "ONE!" in the not too distant future? -- I was very heavily into pornography. Then my pornograph broke. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org