Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
Mike McMullin wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 23:48 -0500, Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
Basil Chupin wrote:
Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
Philip Dowie wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008 19:11, Banning someone out of personal > spite is uncalled for fascism wrote: > > A) Personal spite can in no way be equated with Fascism. > B) Banning someone for irrelevant, uncalled-for, slanderous and > hateful > rhetoric is entirely appropriate. Isn't the phrase we are looking for here "please, don't feed the trolls"?
If Henne's going to be a disrespectful jerk, then I'm going to call attention to it, until he stops. Oh, in the name of "truth, justice and the American way" AK, give it away! I've got an entire telephone book full of names sitting next on the shelf.
I'm not going to let some jerk whose authority exceeds his wisdom push me around.
Really, you don't want to open that can of worms Aaron.
I don't let bullies push me around because THEY can't handle people who look at things differently than they do.
I won't let "bullies" "push you around" either. Name these naughty-type scoundrels, these "bullies" who push you around and I'll get my wife to hit them, really hard, with her handbag! Just name them and I'll take care of the rest! Trust me.
I'm bit bucketing this addy from you.
What a flake.
"Flake"? -- I was very heavily into pornography. Then my pornograph broke. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org