Philippe Landau wrote:
Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
Philip Dowie wrote:
On Thursday 28 February 2008 19:11, Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote: A) Personal spite can in no way be equated with Fascism. B) Banning someone for irrelevant, uncalled-for, slanderous and hateful rhetoric is entirely appropriate.
Isn't the phrase we are looking for here "please, don't feed the trolls"?
If Henne's going to be a disrespectful jerk, then I'm going to call attention to it, until he stops.
One rule of successful policing, Aaron, is not to make everyone your enemy. Policing the world is difficult when your empire is destroyed from within by psychopathic mobsters. You are not a troll
Don't be too sure about this - have a good look at what a "troll" could be.
but you have to learn to respect your limits.
Personal attacks like the above need to be banned to allow a fruitful exchange. If your war places you above the law there just now,
How can anyone be "placed above the law" because of (an illegal [when was 'war' declared on any nation in the last 60 years?]) war or any other justification for that matter? Certainly not in the EU or any nation which adheres to the principle of being a democratic nation. Aren't all civilised nations signatories to the Geneva Convention?
here you aren't.
Philippe
Perhaps not. Ciao. -- I was very heavily into pornography. Then my pornograph broke. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org