On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:52 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 02:22 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 10:01 -0500, Carl Hartung wrote:
On Thu January 11 2007 09:48, Basil Chupin wrote:
Well mine "disappeared" when I installed the earlier version from OO some many months ago but the original icon from the 10.2 install remained... Thanks, Basil. I'd already created a new launcher but was curious if your experience was the same.
Carl
On the OO2.1 topic; I see the non anti-aliased font rendering is still broken (renders Tahoma almost unreadable).
Is this a OO or OpenSuse problem? Just tried using Tahoma in a test document and found no problems with
Hans van der Merwe wrote: this font.
Do you have Geecko>Configure Desktop>Appearance>Fonts>Use Anti-aliasing>Configure>Use Sub-pixel hinting set to Medium?
Cheers.
I have all that setup - my desktop and ALL other apps display fine (Tahoma 8pt anti-aliasing off - till up to 12pt) Just OO displays horribly with anti-aliasing turned off in its configuration.
Certainly turning off anti-aliasing in OO has some effect (you can see it immediately in the toolbar) but the Tahoma font is still very much readable and not as you describe (above).
Cheers.
Ok unreadable is prop bit harsh - but as you say turning off anti-aliasing in OO and using Tahoma for the menus (like I do for all my other apps) just looks horrible. I see there are others with the same issue: http://en.opensuse.org/Talk:Optimal_Use_of_MS_TrueType_Core_Fonts_for_a_KDE_... check the last post message. E-Mail disclaimer: http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org