On 2006-11-05 00:03, JB wrote:
On Friday 03 November 2006 21:46, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
On 2006-11-03 21:15, Ed McCanless wrote:
Darryl Gregorash wrote:
<snip> Who else? I am sure you can think of other ways the legal team in such a venture could be funded -- there is, after all, no law against donating a few dimes or dollars to someone like the FFS, in order to assist with the legal costs.
I'm afraid the division between donors and non-donors would be similar to the division in this discussion.
With those crying "wolf" the loudest being the ones to contribute the least.
You ass...people who've been *BUYING* SuSE have been contributing. Not every person with a computer can be a developer etc, but many do what they can, it may be writing a part of a FAQ, translating, whatever. All you did with your above statement is show what a bore and close-minded jerk you are.
I have no idea what you are talking about. When I raised the possibility of a suit against Novell/Microsoft for a GPL violation re: Linux kernel, it was suggested that there wouldn't be any money to pay for it (Moglen has since announced the FSF will go to the wall to fight any GPL violations as a result of this agreement). I suggested a few dollars from Linux users to assist in the costs, amongst other things What in blazes has buying suse got to do with that? I don't think you understood anything of what I was saying.